USGS Science⌕ Search

USGS · 70210153

Weakness of the lower continental crust: A condition for delamination, uplift, and escape

Abstract

We discuss three interconnected processes that occur during continental compression and extension: delamination of the lower crust and sub-crustal lithosphere, escape tectonics (i.e., lateral crustal flow), and crustal uplift. We combine calculations of lithospheric viscosity–depth curves with geologic observations and seismic images of the deep crust to infer the mechanisms controlling these processes. The basic driving force for delamination is the negative buoyancy (in some regions) of the continental lower crust and sub-crustal lithosphere with respect to the warm, mobile asthenosphere. A phase transformation in the lower crust from mafic granulite facies to eclogite may be important for providing negative buoyancy. Where negative buoyancy exists, the onset of delamination is mainly a question of the presence of a suitable decoupling zone between the denser lithosphere and the lighter upper and middle crust. We estimate the depth to potential decoupling zones by calculating lithospheric viscosity–depth curves based on reasonable geotherms and models of lithospheric composition. Low-viscosity zones occur at three depths: (1) at the base of the felsic (upper) crust; (2) within the lower crust; and (3) several tens of kilometers below the Moho. The commonly observed absence of a high-velocity (>6.8 km/s) lower crustal layer beneath extended crust may be explained by delamination wherein decoupling occurs at the top of the lower crust. In addition to being zones of potential decoupling, crustal low-viscosity zones are avenues for lateral crustal flow, a process that is often referred to as crustal escape (e.g., eastern Tibetan Plateau). The third process addressed here, crustal uplift, is mainly found in compressional environments and can be related to mature (i.e., complete or nearly complete) delamination and/or a thick low-viscosity lower crust. Mature delamination generates crustal uplift as the sinking, dense lithosphere is replaced by the mobilized hot asthenosphere. A very different mechanism of uplift is associated with some continental high plateaus, where a high convergence rate and the lateral intrusion of cold, rigid shield crust into warm, low-viscosity orogenic crust acts like a solid piston moving into hydraulic fluid. The displacement of the low-viscosity crustal `fluid' generates broad plateau uplifts. Modern examples are the intrusion of the Indian shield into the Tibetan Plateau and the Brazilian shield into the Andes. All of these processes, delamination, tectonic escape, and uplift are interconnected and are related to weakness in the lower crust during continental compression and extension.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R. Meissner, Walter D. Mooney. 1998. Weakness of the lower continental crust: A condition for delamination, uplift, and escape. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0040-1951(98)00136-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

GST-1: A high-resolution global sediment thickness model

Global Sediment Thickness 1 (GST-1) is a high-resolution sedimentary thickness model calculated on a 0.125° x 0.125° grid. It modifies the sediment thickness of the 1° x 1° Earth Crustal Model 1 (ECM1) by means of 3D inversions of free air gravity anomalies. GST-1 is calculated by performing structural inversions on high-density contrasts across two crustal boundaries: the sediment – basement interface and the crystalline crust – upper mantle interface. The inversions are calculated in each of ten overlapping 3D models that span the globe. These ten models are merged to obtain the GST-1 global model, providing an eight-fold increase in lateral spatial resolution in comparison with ECM1 and CRUST 1.0. Our sediment thickness model exploits the nearly continuous sampling of gravity data when compared to the irregular, sparse sampling of seismic refraction data. Sediment thickness values in GST-1 are in excellent agreement with independently derived cross sections from well-studied sedimentary basins, and within expected resolution limits of seismic refraction data. GST-1 offers a robust, high resolution global model of sedimentary thickness to support studies of sedimentary basins.

Tectonophysics↗

Re-examination of the 1958 Huslia earthquake sequence and regional tectonics of the northwestern Koyukuk Basin, Alaska

In 1958 a M w 6.8 (M S = 7.3) mainshock and two M w ∼ 5.9 aftershocks occurred near the village of Huslia in the remote Koyukuk Basin of northern interior Alaska, with no surface faulting recognized afterward. This region lies in a transitional zone between compressional tectonics associated with the collision of the Pacific and Yakutat plates with North America and the extrusion of western Alaska. Since 1969 several earthquake swarms with M w 4–5 events have occurred ∼50 km northwest of Huslia in the western Purcell Mountains, including a swarm in 2019–2022 with over 9500 events. Previous waveform modeling studies conducted 30 years ago suggest the 1958 mainshock occurred on a northeast-trending normal fault. This sense of rupture is inconsistent with focal mechanisms and trends of post-1973 seismicity in the 1958 epicentral region that indicate strike-slip motion along northwest or southeast trending faults. A recently mapped east-west striking fault scarp along the southern front of the Purcell Mountains is also inconsistent with northeast-striking normal faulting. To better characterize the 1958 sequence and its relation to the regional tectonics, we measured scarp profiles across the Purcell Mountains scarp, relocated pre-1974 seismicity, analyzed first motions of pre-1974 events, and modeled potential fields (gravity, magnetics) geophysical data. Our results suggest complex regional deformation occurs along east-west, north-south and northwest-southeast trending strike-slip faults and northwest-southeast trending normal faults. The Purcell Mountains swarm may be related to hydrothermal activity as several hot springs surround the region.

Alaska↗

Fairweather transform boundary Oligocene to present orogenesis: Fairweather Range vertical extrusion and rotation of the Yakutat microplate at ca. 3 Ma

Oblique-slip along transform fault boundaries is often partitioned between a strike-slip system and thrust faults that accommodate contraction. However, topography along the Yakutat-North American transform (Fairweather fault), is asymmetric with low-terrain above active thrusts on the western, Yakutat side of the transform and high topography on the continental side with peaks >4500 m (Mount Fairweather: 4671 m) to the west of the Border Ranges fault, limited recorded earthquakes >M4, and no apparent reverse faults to generate the highest terrain. In this study we compile, for the first time, published U-Pb zircon, 40 Ar/ 39 Ar and K-Ar (hornblende, muscovite, and biotite) and U-Th/He and fission-track (zircon and apatite) bedrock ages (109) from 75 samples to investigate the exhumation history of the Fairweather Range region, complemented by a published detrital sample (ZFT and AFT) and 13 new 40 Ar/ 39 Ar (hornblende, biotite, and K-feldspar) ages on 9 bedrock samples from both sides of the Fairweather fault. Additionally, we examined published seismicity and geodetic data of the Fairweather region and assessed if plate paleo-vectors correlate with the cooling history of the Fairweather Range. Cooling age, seismic, and block-motion patterns indicate the Fairweather Range has been vertically extruded between the Fairweather and the Border Ranges faults as a coherent block since ca. 25 Ma. The pre-6 Ma Pacific plate motion (N30°W) aligns with the N33°W strike of the Fairweather Fault whereas a hypothetical pre-6 Ma Yakutat microplate paleo-vector of (N39°W) does not: indicating a post-6 Ma timing for Yakutat microplate counter-clockwise rotation (9°). We infer that rotation and impingement of the Yakutat microplate along the Fairweather fault at ca. 3 Ma led to the development of the Fairweather restraining bend and increased cooling rates. The resultant thickened Fairweather welt and the ∼30 km thick southeast end of the Yakutat microplate compounded double-indenter tectonics into Alaska's southeast convergent corner

Tectonophysics↗