USGS Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70207168

A rapid assessment method for ground layer coastal vegetation

Chellby R. Kilheffer·Jordan Raphael·Lindsay Ries·H. Brian Underwood
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We aim to test a rapid ecological assessment method to monitor regenerating coastal vegetation without sacrificing accuracy. We estimated species frequency in vegetation plots using traditional point intercept methods. We also tested a rapid, digital method to take high-resolution digital photographs of plots. We navigated among plot locations using a sub-meter Differential Global Positioning System instead of using permanent plot markers, and analyzed plot photographs in a point intercept manner (i.e., grid) in Geographic Information Systems software. We assessed species frequency in 52 permanent plots using traditional and digital methods. Traditional methods required 39.2 min per plot and digital methods required 4.6 min per plot. Estimates of frequency from traditional methods were substantially higher than those from digital methods for permanent plots, so we used an independent assessment of vegetation coverage to calibrate the utility of digital methods. A logistic regression equation can be used to compare historical traditional estimates to those collected digitally. Digital point intercept methods were successfully used for rapid ecological assessment. The primary advantages of digital methods include overwhelming efficiency compared to traditional methods, a resultant increase in sample size, and the ability to recover more accurate estimates of species frequency. Disadvantages of digital methods include a restriction of use for ground layer vegetation and positional inaccuracies introduced through sub-meter navigation. While traditional methods are less accurate in estimating species frequency, they are ideal for capturing accurate temporal trends in vegetation growth since they rely upon the use of permanent plot markers.

Explore related subjects

Journal of Coastal ConservationArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chellby R. Kilheffer, Jordan Raphael, Lindsay Ries, H. Brian Underwood. 2019-11-21. A rapid assessment method for ground layer coastal vegetation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-019-00712-z

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Dynamic availability of early successional piping plover nesting habitat at Cape Lookout National Seashore, North Carolina, USA

Early successional species like piping plovers ( Charadrius melodus ) rely on storms and other natural disturbances to create and maintain habitat on coastal landscapes, but anticipating year-to-year habitat availability for management purposes is difficult where dynamic conditions persist. Our objective was to understand how piping plover nesting habitat changed over an eight-year period (imagery years 2014–2022) at Cape Lookout National Seashore, North Carolina, United States of America. We mapped habitat availability using a Bayesian network habitat selection model and analyses of digital elevation models and aerial imagery from the years 2014, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2022. We found an approximately two-fold fluctuation in habitat area from a minimum 4.56 km 2 (2017) to a maximum 8.31 km 2 (2014) within this period. The majority of habitat occurred in backshore areas and geomorphic settings created through storm overwash and outwash. Piping plovers favored persistent habitats that were available in the same location for multiple years and demonstrated variability in their use of newly created habitats. Although birds nested in storm-created overwash/outwash features and backshore areas in high percentages, we did not find correlations between habitat area and the time since the last storm occurred nor the number of storms that came within 200 nautical miles of North Carolina in a 12-month period. We also did not find significant correlations between habitat area and average annual productivity nor number of breeding pairs. This suggests that the population may not be habitat-limited or that habitat alone is not driving population decline at this location. While overwash was instrumental in creating early successional sand flats, outwash caused by sound-side flooding created dozens of new ponds that formed nesting-foraging habitat mosaics that could be of value to nesting piping plovers and their chicks.

North Carolina↗
USGS2021

Stormwater systems as a source of marine debris: A case study from the Mediterranean coast of Israel

Drainage (or stormwater) systems are a potential source of marine debris. Approximately 67 km (33%) of the land along the Mediterranean coast of Israel is considered urban, covered by concrete and asphalt. The purpose of the present pilot study was to determine the composition of the solid waste in a drainage system and evaluate to what extent municipal sources contribute to marine debris. We sampled the waste in Netanya, a medium-size city (245,000 residents) on the central Mediterranean coast of Israel. Samples were taken from seven street stormwater receptacles prior to the first significant rain and then on the beach near a drainage outlet, a few hours after this substantial rain. In terms of composition of the debris, paper, cigarette butts, and sanitary items made up a higher proportion of the drainage system debris than those items did on the beach. In contrast, single-use items, polystyrene pieces, bottle caps, and plastic drinking bottles composed more of the debris on the beaches compared to the debris in the drainage system. Overall, we found that municipal stormwater systems contribute significant amounts of solid waste to marine debris on Israeli beaches. Preventing the waste from reaching the streets might help reduce marine debris on the beaches, especially at the beginning of the rainy season. There are multiple solutions, but all will require creativity and resources and constant maintenance. Educating the public to prevent disposal of solid waste items in the street is also important as a way to reduce terrestrial as well as marine debris.

Journal of Coastal Conservation↗
USGS2018

A review of coastal management approaches to support the integration of ecological and human community planning for climate change

The resilience of socio-ecological systems to sea level rise, storms and flooding can be enhanced when coastal habitats are used as natural infrastructure. Grey infrastructure has long been used for coastal flood protection but can lead to unintended negative impacts. Natural infrastructure often provides similar services as well as added benefits that support short- and long-term biological, cultural, social, and economic goals. While natural infrastructure is becoming more widespread in practice, it often represents a relatively small fraction within portfolios of coastal risk-reducing strategies compared to more traditional grey infrastructure. This study provides a comprehensive review of how natural infrastructure is being used along the United States Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean coasts related to four habitats – tidal marshes, beaches and barrier islands, mangroves, and biogenic reefs. We compare information on the benefits, opportunities and challenges of implementing natural, grey and hybrid infrastructure in the coastal zone. In addition, we present a suite of actions to increase information and reduce uncertainty so that coastal mangers and planners are aware of the full suite of options for restoration, conservation and planning that maximize ecosystem services over short- and long-term planning horizons.

Journal of Coastal Conservation↗