USGS Science⌕ Search

USGS · 70196265

Technical note: False low turbidity readings from optical probes during high suspended-sediment concentrations

Abstract

Turbidity, a measure of water clarity, is monitored for a variety of purposes including (1) to help determine whether water is safe to drink, (2) to establish background conditions of lakes and rivers and detect pollution caused by construction projects and stormwater discharge, (3) to study sediment transport in rivers and erosion in catchments, (4) to manage siltation of water reservoirs, and (5) to establish connections with aquatic biological properties, such as primary production and predator–prey interactions. Turbidity is typically measured with an optical probe that detects light scattered from particles in the water. Probes have defined upper limits of the range of turbidity that they can measure. The general assumption is that when turbidity exceeds this upper limit, the values of turbidity will be constant, i.e., the probe is pegged ; however, this assumption is not necessarily valid. In rivers with limited variation in the physical properties of the suspended sediment, at lower suspended-sediment concentrations, an increase in suspended-sediment concentration will cause a linear increase in turbidity. When the suspended-sediment concentration in these rivers is high, turbidity levels can exceed the upper measurement limit of an optical probe and record a constant pegged value. However, at extremely high suspended-sediment concentrations, optical turbidity probes do not necessarily stay pegged at a constant value. Data from the Colorado River in Grand Canyon, Arizona, USA, and a laboratory experiment both demonstrate that when turbidity exceeds instrument-pegged conditions, increasing suspended-sediment concentration (and thus increasing turbidity) may cause optical probes to record decreasing false turbidity values that appear to be within the valid measurement range of the probe. Therefore, under high-turbidity conditions, other surrogate measurements of turbidity (e.g., acoustic-attenuation measurements or suspended-sediment samples) are necessary to correct these low false turbidity measurements and accurately measure turbidity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nicholas Voichick, David J. Topping, Ronald E. Griffiths. 2018-03-12. Technical note: False low turbidity readings from optical probes during high suspended-sediment concentrations. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1767-2018

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Predicting streamflow drought in the conterminous United States using machine learning and a donor-gage approach, 1982–2020

Drought is a highly consequential natural disaster that may likely increase in both severity and extent across the conterminous United States (CONUS). The mechanisms affecting the propagation of drought from the atmosphere to streamflow are complex and interactive, making the prediction of streamflow drought difficult with current modeling approaches. Machine learning is an emerging tool in the field of hydrology that may be well-suited to prediction of streamflow drought across large and topographically diverse areas. Here, we train and analyze 3198 random forest models at U.S. Geological Survey streamgages to understand common meteorological drivers of streamflow drought and to define physiographic characteristics of basins sensitive to these drivers. We also develop a novel dynamic regionalization approach using donor gages to predict daily streamflow drought at pseudo-ungaged locations. Our results show that teleconnections, temperature, evaporative demand, and snow–water equivalent are important drivers of streamflow drought in the West, Southwest, and Northern Rocky Mountains (Northern Rockies) regions of the United States, and precipitation and soil moisture are primary drivers of streamflow drought in the Northeast, Southeast, and the Northwest regions. Prediction using dynamic regionalization shows comparable performance to at-site models. This method may be applicable to other hydrologic prediction problems requiring transferability to ungaged locations.

conterminous United States↗

Proposing sources for discrete groundwater discharges to patterned pools in three regional raised northern peat bogs

Raised northern peat bogs are generally assumed to be entirely precipitation-fed (ombrogenous), suggesting they are void of groundwater (minerogenous) inflow from underlying sediments. Patterned pools in raised bogs have often been attributed to surficial flow filling depressions along the peat surface that produces subtle differences in peat pore-water chemistry. However, we present evidence that certain patterned pools may be partially fed by localized upwelling of minerogenous groundwater from underlying glacial sediments in three northern peat bogs of Maine, USA. Underlying permeable glacial deposits, embedded in hydraulically confining glacio-marine clay deposits, were delineated using ground-penetrating radar and transient electromagnetic surveys. Paired point measurements of temperature and specific conductance (SpC) were surveyed around pools, and statistical relationships indicative of groundwater upwelling were established. Uncrewed aerial systems (UAS) thermal infrared (TIR) mapping was conducted, augmented by handheld TIR imaging, to examine characteristic groundwater temperatures in cold and warm seasons across pool surfaces. Surface water samples were acquired to assess the relationship between SpC / temperature signals and elevated iron and manganese concentrations that could be indicative of glacial aquifer sources. The combined datasets present evidence for localized upwelling in pools underlain by glacial structures, and the possibility of minerogenous groundwater contributions. Upwelling through the peat matrix is possibly partially facilitated by macropore, “peat pipe” features that serve as preferential flowpaths of varying lengths to the surface. Such upwelling could drive a positive feedback loop where elevated concentrations of ionic constituents repeatedly dilate the peat matrix and/or terminal electron acceptors enhance anaerobic respiration and microbial activity, accelerating the humification of peat around patterned pools and potentially magnifying carbon loss.

Maine↗

Technical note: A low-cost approach to monitoring relative streamflow dynamics in small headwater streams using time lapse imagery and a deep learning model

Despite their ubiquity and importance as freshwater habitat, small headwater streams are under-monitored by existing stream gage networks. To address this gap, we describe a low-cost, non-contact, and low-effort method that enables organizations to monitor relative streamflow dynamics in small headwater streams. The method uses a camera to capture repeat images of the stream from a fixed position. A person then annotates pairs of images, in each case indicating which image has more apparent streamflow or indicating equal flow if no difference is discernible. A deep learning modeling framework called streamflow rank estimation (SRE) is then trained on the annotated image pairs and applied to rank all images from highest to lowest apparent streamflow. From this result a relative hydrograph can be derived. We found that our modeled relative hydrograph dynamics matched the observed hydrograph dynamics well for 11 cameras at 8 streamflow sites in western Massachusetts. Higher performance was observed during the annotation period (median Kendall's Tau rank correlation of 0.75, with a range of 0.6–0.83) than after it (median Kendall's Tau of 0.59, with range 0.34–0.74). We found that annotation performance was generally consistent across the 11 camera sites and 2 individual annotators and was positively correlated with streamflow variability at a site. A scaling simulation determined that model performance improvements were limited after 1000 annotation pairs. Our model's estimates of relative flow, while not equivalent to absolute flow, may still be useful for many applications, such as ecological modeling and calculating event-based hydrological statistics (e.g., the number of out-of-bank floods). We anticipate that this method will be a valuable tool to extend existing stream monitoring networks and provide new insights on dynamic headwater systems.

Massachusetts↗