USGS ScienceSearch

USGS · 70185005

Electrofishing effort requirements for estimating species richness in the Kootenai River, Idaho

Abstract

This study was conducted on the Kootenai River, Idaho to provide insight on sampling requirements to optimize future monitoring effort associated with the response of fish assemblages to habitat rehabilitation. Our objective was to define the electrofishing effort (m) needed to have a 95% probability of sampling 50, 75, and 100% of the observed species richness and to evaluate the relative influence of depth, velocity, and instream woody cover on sample size requirements. Sidechannel habitats required more sampling effort to achieve 75 and 100% of the total species richness than main-channel habitats. The sampling effort required to have a 95% probability of sampling 100% of the species richness was 1100 m for main-channel sites and 1400 m for side-channel sites. We hypothesized that the difference in sampling requirements between main- and side-channel habitats was largely due to differences in habitat characteristics and species richness between main- and side-channel habitats. In general, main-channel habitats had lower species richness than side-channel habitats. Habitat characteristics (i.e., depth, current velocity, and woody instream cover) were not related to sample size requirements. Our guidelines will improve sampling efficiency during monitoring effort in the Kootenai River and provide insight on sampling designs for other large western river systems where electrofishing is used to assess fish assemblages.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Carson J. Watkins, Michael C. Quist, Bradley B. Shepard, Susan C. Ireland. 2016. Electrofishing effort requirements for estimating species richness in the Kootenai River, Idaho. https://doi.org/10.3955/046.090.0310

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Food habits of nonnative Smallmouth Bass in Coeur d’Alene Lake, Idaho

Smallmouth Bass ( Micropterus dolomieu ) has been widely introduced beyond its native distribution where interactions with other organisms are largely unknown. We examined the food habits of Smallmouth Bass in Coeur d'Alene Lake, Idaho. Smallmouth Bass were sampled monthly from March 2012 to May 2013 using short duration (1–2 hr sets) gill netting and electrofishing. In total, food habits were evaluated from 904 Smallmouth Bass varying in total length from 39 to 492 mm using gastric lavage. Diet composition varied by season and age. Smallmouth Bass less than 100 mm had diets dominated by invertebrates, particularly Ephemeroptera, Odonata, and Diptera. Fishes were increasingly important in the diet of Smallmouth Bass longer than 100 mm. Interestingly, crayfish (Decapoda) were virtually absent in Smallmouth Bass stomachs; only eight Smallmouth Bass had crayfish in their diet. Native vertebrates were also rare in Smallmouth Bass diets. Rather, kokanee ( Oncorhynchus nerka ), a nonnative species, was generally the most commonly consumed fish prey item (present in 5–15% of Smallmouth Bass across seasons). Kokanee contributed the highest percentage of total energy (approximately 45% of all energy) of any prey item. Results of this study suggest that native fishes of conservation concern are a minor component of Smallmouth Bass diets and that kokanee is important in meeting the energy demands of nonnative Smallmouth Bass. Further research on the distribution and abundance of crayfish in the system and on the population-level effects of Smallmouth Bass predation on kokanee would be insightful and help guide management actions in Coeur d'Alene Lake and similar systems in western North America.

Idaho

Comparison of lapilli otoliths and pectoral fin rays for estimating age of Northern Pikeminnows

The Northern Pikeminnow Ptychocheilus oregonensis is a piscivorous cyprinid native to western North America. Information on the best structure for estimating the age of Northern Pikeminnows is a key knowledge gap that may limit inquiries on management efforts. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate between-reader precision and concordance between age estimates for lapilli otoliths and pectoral fin rays from Northern Pikeminnows. Age estimates from lapilli otoliths were compared to those from pectoral fin rays of 150 Northern Pikeminnows captured from Lake Cascade, Idaho, in April–May 2022. Exact percent agreement of estimated ages between the readers was higher for fin rays (75.3%) than otoliths (50.0%), with a mean coefficient of variation of 3.5 and 8.7, respectively. Readers also assigned a confidence rating (0–3; higher value reflects higher confidence in age estimate) to each structure. Confidence ratings were higher for fin ray age estimates (mean ± SD; 1.6 ± 0.6) than otolith estimates (1.1 ± 0.7) between readers. A consensus age was estimated for each structure and fish. Agreement between consensus age estimates for otoliths and fin rays was 26.7% with a coefficient of variation of 14.0. Our findings suggest that fin rays were easier to collect, process, and read than otoliths, and resulted in more precise age estimates than otoliths. Results from our study provide guidance on the best structures for estimating the age of Northern Pikeminnows that can be used to inform management efforts.

Idaho

Gas bubble trauma progression and mortality in sculpin, threespine stickleback, and Northern pikeminnow

We examined the progression of gas bubble trauma (GBT) and associated mortality in sculpin ( Cottus spp.), threespine stickleback ( Gasterosteus aculeatus ), and Northern pikeminnow ( Ptychocheilus oregonensis ) exposed to three levels of total dissolved gas (TDG; 120, 125, and 130% saturation) in laboratory experiments. Sculpin were most sensitive to elevated TDG followed by stickleback and then pikeminnow, which were least sensitive. This was evidenced by GBT and associated mortality progressing fastest in sculpin and slowest in pikeminnow. GBT incidence and severity increased through time at all TDG levels tested, but relationships between severity and exposure time were statistically weak or nonexistent. GBT mortality progressed more rapidly as TDG increased in all species. Regional criteria developed to rank GBT in salmonids did not fully capture the incidence and severity of GBT in the three nonsalmonids we examined. Rather, using criteria that considered all areas of the fish provided more accurate data. The lateral line, body, dorsal fin, and pectoral fins were common locations of GBT in sculpin whereas in stickleback and pikeminnow, GBT was most common on the head and body. The proximate cause of GBT-related death was bubbles in the gills and heart, but unlike in other species, bubbles in these organs appeared rapidly just before the point of death. Our findings provide some of the first information on TDG effects on these little-studied species.

Oregon, Washington