Regional differences in upland forest to developed (urban) land cover conversions in the conterminous U.S., 1973–2011

Roger F. Auch; Mark A. Drummond; George Z. Xian; Kristi L. Sayler; William Acevedo; Janis Taylor

doi:10.3390/f7070132

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70182791

Regional differences in upland forest to developed (urban) land cover conversions in the conterminous U.S., 1973–2011

Roger F. Auch·Mark A. Drummond·George Z. Xian·Kristi L. Sayler·William Acevedo·Janis Taylor

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this U.S. Geological Survey study of forest land cover across the conterminous U.S. (CONUS), specific proportions and rates of forest conversion to developed (urban) land were assessed on an ecoregional basis. The study period was divided into six time intervals between 1973 and 2011. Forest land cover was the source of 40% or more of the new urban land in 35 of the 84 ecoregions located within the CONUS. In 11 of these ecoregions this threshold exceeded in every time interval. When the percent of change, forest to urban, was compared to the percent of forest in each ecoregion, 58 ecoregions had a greater percent of change and, in six of those, change occurred in every time interval. Annual rates of forest to urban land cover change of 0.2% or higher occurred in 12 ecoregions at least once and in one ecoregion in all intervals. There were three ecoregions where the above conditions were met for nearly every time interval. Even though only a small number of the ecoregions were heavily impacted by forest loss to urban development within the CONUS, the ecosystem services provided by undeveloped forest land cover need to be quantified more completely to better inform future regional land management.

Explore related subjects

Forests Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 25.08° to 49.38905° latitude; -124.68721° to -66.96466° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Roger F. Auch, Mark A. Drummond, George Z. Xian, Kristi L. Sayler, William Acevedo, Janis Taylor. 2016-06-28. Regional differences in upland forest to developed (urban) land cover conversions in the conterminous U.S., 1973–2011. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7070132

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Advancing ecosystem recovery with diverse species plantings in tropical forest restoration

Tropical forest restoration has increased in the past decades, with possible advancements given the UN declaration of the “Decade of Ecosystem Restoration”. However, robust assessments to compare ecosystem functions among restored forest stages are essential. We evaluated 13 actively restored forest stands ranging from 3 to 21 years of age and compared measures of forest biodiversity, structure, and ecosystem function to four 70+ year old “reference” stands that serve as restoration “targets” in the study region of the Premontane wet forest of Costa Rica. The restored stands were planted with an average of 13 tree species on abandoned pastures that were fallow for at least two years. Sixteen tree-stand attributes and six ecosystem function estimates were assessed, including: annual biomass (C) accumulation, N-fixation potential, threatened species conservation, and the provision of avian frugivore forage, insect habitat, and insect pollination. Using Principal Component Analysis, linear modeling, and Mahalanobis distance analyses, we learned that planting a diversity of tree species sets the stage for forest recovery at early restoration ages, with an inflection point at 15 years towards older reference forest characteristics and functions. Given that all restoration ages provided tree diversity and some level of ecosystem functions, the value of all restored stands in the landscape is notable. The assessment methods are easily employed, thereby providing an accessible tool to restoration practitioners.

Monteverde↗

USGS2026

Building resilience in dryland ecosystems: A climate adaptation strategy menu for pinyon–juniper woodlands

Pinyon–juniper (PJ) woodlands, one of the most extensive mature and old-growth woodland types in the Western United States, provide critical ecological, cultural, and economic benefits but face increasing threats from climate change, altered disturbance regimes, invasive species, and pests. We developed the PJ Woodland Climate Adaptation Management Menu, a decision support tool designed to guide adaptive, climate-informed management of PJ ecosystems, particularly within the Colorado Plateau ecoregion. The menu was created through an iterative, collaborative process involving literature review, integration of strategies from existing adaptation frameworks, and extensive input from scientists, land managers, and community partners during workshops and focus groups. The menu links specific, evidence-based approaches to each of six broad strategies, including soliciting community input, mitigating disturbance, enhancing and maintaining biodiversity, conserving ecotones, timing actions for optimal outcomes, and accepting climate-driven changes when appropriate. It is intended for use with the Adaptation Workbook to help managers connect local goals and climate vulnerabilities to tailored management tactics. Hypothetical scenarios demonstrate the menu’s application to contrasting PJ woodland conditions, from die-off events to old-growth maintenance. Lessons learned during development underscore the value of early stakeholder engagement, cross-sector collaboration, and balancing diverse ecological objectives. This menu offers a flexible, transferable framework to strengthen climate resilience in PJ woodlands and serves as a model that could improve adaptation planning in other dryland forest ecosystems.

Forests↗

USGS2024

Sequoia groves of Yosemite: Visitor use and impacts monitoring

Despite being long-lived and massive, giant sequoias ( Sequoiadendron giganteum (Lindl.) J. Bucholz) are susceptible to erosion given their relatively shallow root structure. Human-caused soil compaction and vegetation loss through social trails are primary drivers of erosion in giant sequoia groves, particularly for trees that are near formal trails and access roads. We develop a method to observe and quantify the near-tree impacts from park visitors and to relate the overall amount of use with ground cover impact parameters to assess whether the desired conditions of each grove are being met for the park to maintain a spectrum of recreational opportunities. We collected data on visitation, ground cover, soil compaction, and social trailing using a combination of targeted surveys and observations at the three giant sequoia groves in Yosemite National Park. The Mariposa Grove receives the most visitation, and use levels among groves were consistent with relative size and facilities available. Selected parameters for ground cover data were analyzed by comparing values within undisturbed versus trampling-disturbed subplots at both 0–2 m and 2–8 m. Exposed soil cover and compaction were generally higher in anthropogenically disturbed subplots versus undisturbed subplots, and vegetation cover was reduced in some disturbed subplots. Each grove had one surveyed tree where average soil compaction was ≥2.2 kg/cm 2 , which may limit root growth and impact seedling regeneration. Each of the three groves had some trees with social trail presence, yet less than 7% of mature trees within any grove were impacted by social trails, and most social trails were rated as having low impairment. Coupling soil compaction measurements and estimates of trampling-disturbed areas with mapping of social trail conditions within groves provides a general assessment of visitor-associated impacts to sequoia groves and can facilitate a relatively rapid way to track hotspot (i.e., increasingly impacted) trees over time.

California↗