USGS ScienceSearch

USGS · 70178090

Linking the Central and Southern Appalachian Blue Ridge: What We Know and Don’t Know about Stratigraphy, Structure, Tectonism, and Regional Correlation in the Eastern Blue Ridge of Virginia

Abstract

The transition from Neoproterozoic Lynchburg Group rocks on the eastern limb of the para-autochthonous Blue Ridge anticlinorium in central Virginia to the fault-bounded Ashe Formation and Alligator Back Formation in southern Virginia has been a source of intense debate and speculation for decades. There are fundamental differences in the tectonogenetic interpretation for these rock packages, despite many similarities in lithology. This problem is compounded by insufficient detailed mapping (1:24,000-scale) in critical key areas of this transition. Lynchburg Group rocks unconformably overlie Mesoproterozoic meta-igneous rocks and underlie Catoctin greenstone on the east limb of the anticlinorium in central Virginia. In southern Virginia, similar metasedimentary lithologies – metasandstone (meta-feldspathic greywacke, meta-quartz arenite, meta-quartz wacke), graphitic schist, and pebble metaconglomerate – and mafic to ultramafic rocks of the Ashe Formation and Alligator Back Formation are faulted onto Mesoproterozoic meta-igneous rocks along the Gossan Lead and Red Valley faults. Internal to the eastern Blue Ridge of southern Virginia, the Rock Castle Creek fault separates Ashe Formation, consisting of Lynchburg-like lithologies, from polydeformed Alligator Back Formation rocks, which crop out in the core of the Ararat River synclinorium. Regional reconnaissance suggests Ashe Formation rocks re-emerge on the eastern limb of the synclinorium. Fundamental and conflicting differences in tectonogenetic models for these rocks compound the problem. The Neoproterozoic Lynchburg Group has long been thought to represent Laurentian margin rift-related rocks, with intrusive mantle-derived dikes and sills of mafic and ultramafic character. In contrast, the Ashe Formation and Alligator Back Formation in southern Virginia and northwestern North Carolina are possibly in part younger, and interpreted to be part of a distal margin accretionary wedge with entrained and tectonically emplaced dismembered ophiolite fragments of mafic and ultramafic rocks. Only detailed mapping in critical areas, coupled with new and emerging geochemical and geochronologic analyses will solve the persistent questions about the various units.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mark W. Carter, Arthur J. Merschat. 2016. Linking the Central and Southern Appalachian Blue Ridge: What We Know and Don’t Know about Stratigraphy, Structure, Tectonism, and Regional Correlation in the Eastern Blue Ridge of Virginia. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70178090

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Loma salmonae and related species

Loma salmonae is a microsporidium that infects Pacific salmon and causes a gill inflammatory syndrome known as microsporidial gill disease of salmon. This disease has been mostly associated with netpen-farmed Chinook salmon ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ) in British Columbia, Canada. Clinical, diagnostic, pathological aspects of disease, as well as approaches for disease avoidance in salmon aquaculture are discussed. A laboratory infection model in rainbow trout was used to determine life cycle-stages, transmission dynamics, pathophysiology, influence of temperature, and to test therapeutics applicable to aquaculture. This experimental model has been informative on various approaches of disease control, including the development of a promising vaccine. In addition to improving fish health in salmon farming in North America, this L. salmonae model will be applicable to other microsporidial diseases that may be encountered in emerging aquaculture regions.

Book chapter

Cumulative effects of multiple stressors on marine mammals: Elephant seals as a model system

Noise exposure is a potential stressor for free-ranging marine mammals and is often studied in the absence of other environmental factors. Here, a multi-investigator, interdisciplinary effort was undertaken to examine the response of elephant seals to multiple stressors. An integrated physiological and ecological approach was taken, including immunology, stress physiology, toxicology, animal behavior, population biology, and life history theory, to examine the cumulative effects of exposure to multiple stressors in elephant seals. While we measured the response of individual animals, a population response can be predicted by incorporating these results into the long-term data on elephant seal demographics.

Book chapter

When is a parasite a problem?

A parasite’s perceived societal impact depends on the disease it causes and the perception of the affected host species. For instance, doctors and veterinarians have a mission to treat parasites that infect humans or that impact host species that have some utilitarian or aesthetic value for society. Marine scientists have different concerns than doctors. Although the number of parasites that marine scientists should be concerned about may vary, only 13% of parasites and 6% of host–parasite links might be considered “problematic” in a kelp forest food web. With regard to the many threats to marine ecosystems, these percentages suggest that most parasites and infectious diseases are inconsequential. A related issue is the common expectation that parasites and the impacts that they cause are increasing under stress as ocean environments across the globe degrade. Yet, reports of disease have not increased due to human impacts on the marine environment, where the factors that influence parasitism are more complex. Thus, the expectation that marine parasites create problems, and that the diseases they cause are getting worse, is more likely the exception than the rule.

Book chapter