USGS Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70171539

1984–2010 trends in fire burn severity and area for the conterminous US

Joshua J. Picotte·Birgit E. Peterson·Gretchen Meier·Stephen M. Howard
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Burn severity products created by the Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) project were used to analyse historical trends in burn severity. Using a severity metric calculated by modelling the cumulative distribution of differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR) and Relativized dNBR (RdNBR) data, we examined burn area and burn severity of 4893 historical fires (1984–2010) distributed across the conterminous US (CONUS) and mapped by MTBS. Yearly mean burn severity values (weighted by area), maximum burn severity metric values, mean area of burn, maximum burn area and total burn area were evaluated within 27 US National Vegetation Classification macrogroups. Time series assessments of burned area and severity were performed using Mann–Kendall tests. Burned area and severity varied by vegetation classification, but most vegetation groups showed no detectable change during the 1984–2010 period. Of the 27 analysed vegetation groups, trend analysis revealed burned area increased in eight, and burn severity has increased in seven. This study suggests that burned area and severity, as measured by the severity metric based on dNBR or RdNBR, have not changed substantially for most vegetation groups evaluated within CONUS.

Explore related subjects

International Journal of Wildland FireArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Joshua J. Picotte, Birgit E. Peterson, Gretchen Meier, Stephen M. Howard. 2016. 1984–2010 trends in fire burn severity and area for the conterminous US. https://doi.org/10.1071/wf15039

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Elevated perspectives? A case study on the use of aerial imagery for rapid parcel-level wildfire risk assessments in the Kenai Peninsula Borough, Alaska

Background Parcel-level wildfire risk assessments are a crucial tool for understanding risks to residential parcels and identifying wildfire risk mitigation needs. Traditionally, wildfire risk assessments have been conducted in the field by traveling to each individual parcel; however, the development of new remote sensing technology has opened the possibility of conducting wildfire risk assessments remotely. Aims This case study evaluates the trade-offs of using remote imagery to conduct rapid parcel-level wildfire risk assessments. Methods We compare the quantitative and qualitative differences from conducting wildfire risk assessments remotely using aerial imagery and in-field using data from over 2500 parcels in the Alaskan wildland–urban interface. Key results We find significant differences between remote and in-field risk assessments in the coverage and alignment of particular wildfire risk attributes, including address postings, close vegetation and siding materials. Conclusions With high-resolution and contemporary data, remote assessments may be a viable approach for conducting parcel-level risk assessments and evaluating intra-community wildfire risk, though not without limitations. Compared with in-field methods, remote data collection methods do not provide the qualitative benefits acquired from practitioners working directly within communities. Implications Remote imagery can expand coverage of parcel-level wildfire risk assessments, but its performance varies by attributes and image quality.

Alaska↗
USGS2026

Estimating basal area change by tree size with Sentinel-2 imagery following four fires in California, USA

Background Failure to account for tree size when estimating burn severity may not accurately capture post-fire tree mortality and post-fire forest structure. Aims We explored whether basal area mortality by tree size class could be determined from remotely-sensed burn severity indices based solely on Sentinel-2 satellite imagery. Methods We used data collected in four large California wildfires to model the relationship between proportional basal area mortality and burn severity indices derived from Sentinel-2 imagery for three tree diameter class thresholds: small (15 to 30 cm), medium (30 to 50 cm) and large (>50 cm). Key results Our models showed that for a given burn severity index value, the proportion of mortality was greater overall in smaller trees, and that the proportion of mortality in large trees changed more slowly than that of smaller trees with changing burn severity index values. Conclusions We found that models that accounted for tree size can more precisely estimate changes in forest size structure than a similar model that did not account for tree size. Implications Explicitly accounting for tree size can improve estimates of post-fire forest structure, including for large trees which make up the bulk of stand biomass and post-fire seed sources.

California↗
USGS2026

Post-fire soil hydrologic response and recovery in northern California (USA)

Background Wildfires abruptly change landscapes by altering soil properties and vegetation cover. These changes are thought to reduce soil infiltration capacity, making landscapes susceptible to runoff and erosion. However, post-fire soil response is complex and likely varies across locations and time. Aims Here, we aim to understand regional post-fire soil response and recovery by tracking changes across different northern California (USA) lithology and vegetation types. Methods We conducted repeat in situ soil infiltration tests for 3 years post-fire at 31 burned and 10 unburned sites spanning the 2021 Dixie, 2020 LNU Lightning Complex, 2020 Walbridge and 2020 Glass fires. Key results Our two main findings are: (1) burned chaparral soils have increased hydraulic conductivity compared with unburned sites, and (2) infiltration rates return to pre-fire conditions within 3 years across most lithologies and vegetations. Conclusions Recovery might be generalizable by vegetation and lithology but differ regionally, making it important to identify meaningful hydrologic response units (HRUs). Multi-year studies with paired burned and unburned measurements can constrain the recovery timeline and provide information missed by observations solely of burned soils. Implications Understanding where, and for how long, soil remains susceptible to runoff and erosion can help prioritize areas and time periods most in need of mitigation.

California↗