Prey vulnerability to peacock cichlids and largemouth bass based on predator gape and prey body depth

Jeffrey E. Hill; Leo G. Nico; Charles E. Cichra; Carter R. Gilbert

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70161786

Prey vulnerability to peacock cichlids and largemouth bass based on predator gape and prey body depth

Jeffrey E. Hill·Leo G. Nico·Charles E. Cichra·Carter R. Gilbert

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The interaction of prey fish body depth and predator gape size may produce prey assemblages dominated by invulnerable prey and excessive prey-to-predator biomass ratios. Peacock cichlids (Cichla ocellaris) were stocked into southeast Florida canals to consume excess prey fish biomass, particularly spotted tilapia (Tilapia mariae). The ecomorphologically similar largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) was already present in the canals. We present relations of length-specific gape size for peacock cichlids and largemouth bass. Both predators have broadly overlapping gape size, but largemouth bass ?126 mm total length have slightly larger gape sizes than peacock cichlids of the same length. Also, we experimentally tested the predictions of maximum prey size for peacock cichlids and determined that a simple method of measuring gape size used for largemouth bass also is appropriate for peacock cichlids. Lastly, we determined relations of body depth and length of prey species to investigate relative vulnerability. Using a simple predator-prey model and length frequencies of predators and bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus), redear sunfish (Lepomis microlophus), and spotted tilapia prey, we documented that much of the prey biomass in southeast Florida canals is unavailable for largemouth bass and peacock cichlid predation.

Explore related subjects

Proceedings of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 24.546468° to 31.000682° latitude; -87.634938° to -80.031362° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Jeffrey E. Hill, Leo G. Nico, Charles E. Cichra, Carter R. Gilbert. 2005. Prey vulnerability to peacock cichlids and largemouth bass based on predator gape and prey body depth. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70161786

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2011

Perceptions of fish habitat conditions in Oklahoma tailwater fisheries: a survey of fisheries managers

While the downstream effects of dams on fish habitat have long been recognized, broad-scale assessments of tailwater fish habitat have rarely been conducted. In this paper, I report on the status of tailwater fisheries in Oklahoma as determined through a web-based survey of fisheries biologists with the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation conducted in July 2010. Respondents addressed 38 tailwaters, encompassing all major areas of the state. The majority of fish species comprising these fisheries included blue catfish (Ictalurus furcatus), followed by white bass (Morone chrysops), channel catfish (I. punctatus) and flathead catfish (Pylodictis olivaris). Most respondents indicated no or low concerns with fish habitat in tailwaters under their management supervision; only two tailwaters (Tenkiller Ferry and Fort Gibson) had the majority of concerns with fish habitat identified as high to moderately high. Principal components analysis and subsequent correlation analysis showed that tailwaters that scored high for issues related to shoreline erosion, change in water depth, flow fluctuations, and flow timing were associated with dams with large maximum discharge ability. No other factors related to fish habitat condition in tailwaters were found. In Oklahoma, dams with maximum discharge of at least 6,767.5 m3 sec–1 were more likely to have flow-related fish habitat concerns in the tailwater.

Proceedings of the Southeastern Association of Fis↗

USGS2011

Seasonal habitat shifts by benthic fishes in headwater streams

Fish-habitat associations in streams have been widely studied; however, temporal considerations have been neglected, particularly during the winter. We quantitatively sampled perennial headwater streams in the Missouri Ozarks during the summer (n = 13) and winter (n = 4) to evaluate possible habitat shifts by three benthic fishes at two spatial scales: channel unit and microhabitat. Density of all three headwater species in streams was generally lower in winter than summer, with some species being ubiquitous in channel units of streams during the summer and almost entirely absent from the same streams during winter. Presence of each of three species during the summer varied by stream and channel unit, but patterns of channelunit use did not change depending on stream sampled. Ozark sculpin (Cottus hypselurus) was more likely to be present (> 50% probability) in riffles and runs, but not pools. Fantail darter (Etheostoma flabellare) was much more likely to be found in riffles than other channel units whereas rainbow darter (Etheostoma caeruleum) was more likely to occur in runs or pools than riffles. During winter, each of the three species was equally likely to be present or absent from any of the channel units indicating a more general use of channel units. However, each of the three species used deeper microhabitats within pools and slower-velocity areas of riffles during winter compared to summer. Results of this study indicate benthic, headwater species used habitat more generally during cold-water periods compared to warm-water periods, but density estimates indicated changes in channel unit use occurred in some streams and patterns of fine-scale microhabitat shifts did occur.

Proceedings of the Southeastern Association of Fis↗

USGS2011

Dispersal and dam passage of sonic-tagged juvenile lake sturgeon in the upper Tennessee River

More than 90,000 state-endangered lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) have been stocked into the French Broad River, Holston River, and Fort Loudoun Lake in the upper Tennessee River system. Although incidental reports of anglers catching these fish have increased, little is known about their fate after stocking. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate lake sturgeon dispersal throughout the system. Seven submersible ultrasonic receivers were deployed in the upper Tennessee River system and 37 juvenile fish (mean fork length = 660 mm) were surgically implanted with ultrasonic transmitters in the fall of 2007. These fish were stocked at two sites in the headwaters of Fort Loudoun Lake. The receivers logged 1,345 detections of tagged fish and manual tracking located 32 of the 37 tagged lake sturgeon over 21 months. Ten (31%) tagged fish passed through Fort Loudoun Dam and were located downstream in the headwaters of Watts Bar Reservoir; the other tagged fish were still at large above Fort Loudoun Dam when tracking ceased in 2009. Of all fish stocked, three (9%) were last located in the French Broad River and none were located in the Holston River.

Tennessee↗