USGS ScienceSearch

USGS · 70156764

Fire-adaptive trait evolution

Abstract

Until relatively recently the importance of fire and the origin of fire-adaptive traits have received minimal attention from paleoecologists, and appreciation of this importance has varied across the different mediterranean-type climate (MTC) ecosystems. For example, Axelrod (1973) and Raven & Axelrod (1978) wrote extensive treatises on the origins of the California flora, and yet gave little or no mention to the issue of fire in the evolution of these taxa. Hopper (2009) suggests that fire has only been an incidental factor in the evolution of the Western Australian flora. These investigators have weighed climate and soils far above fire as an important evolutionary driver in these plant assemblages and have downplayed this component of community assembly (see Fig. 1.4). Axelrod (1989) even went so far as to suggest fire was irrelevant to the evolution of California chaparral. Although he acknowledged that fire could have played a role in the spread of chaparral-like vegetation during the late Tertiary (2–10 Ma), he insisted that fire had played no significant role in the origin of “adaptive types.” In his view, “Several lines of evidence suggest that the modern fire-adapted taxa may not reflect an evolutionary response to fire. The diverse adaptations to fire probably represent features that originated without the stimulus of fire. . .” Contrary to this belief, we suggest there is sufficient reason to accept a fire origin for many fire-adaptive traits in mediterranean-type vegetation (MTV), and that fire has been a potential ecosystem process on landscapes far longer than the late Tertiary (Bowman et al . 2009; Pausas & Keeley 2009).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jon E. Keeley, William J. Bond, Ross A. Bradstock, Juli G. Pausas, Philip W. Rundel. 2011. Fire-adaptive trait evolution. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139033091.012

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Loma salmonae and related species

Loma salmonae is a microsporidium that infects Pacific salmon and causes a gill inflammatory syndrome known as microsporidial gill disease of salmon. This disease has been mostly associated with netpen-farmed Chinook salmon ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ) in British Columbia, Canada. Clinical, diagnostic, pathological aspects of disease, as well as approaches for disease avoidance in salmon aquaculture are discussed. A laboratory infection model in rainbow trout was used to determine life cycle-stages, transmission dynamics, pathophysiology, influence of temperature, and to test therapeutics applicable to aquaculture. This experimental model has been informative on various approaches of disease control, including the development of a promising vaccine. In addition to improving fish health in salmon farming in North America, this L. salmonae model will be applicable to other microsporidial diseases that may be encountered in emerging aquaculture regions.

Book chapter

Cumulative effects of multiple stressors on marine mammals: Elephant seals as a model system

Noise exposure is a potential stressor for free-ranging marine mammals and is often studied in the absence of other environmental factors. Here, a multi-investigator, interdisciplinary effort was undertaken to examine the response of elephant seals to multiple stressors. An integrated physiological and ecological approach was taken, including immunology, stress physiology, toxicology, animal behavior, population biology, and life history theory, to examine the cumulative effects of exposure to multiple stressors in elephant seals. While we measured the response of individual animals, a population response can be predicted by incorporating these results into the long-term data on elephant seal demographics.

Book chapter

When is a parasite a problem?

A parasite’s perceived societal impact depends on the disease it causes and the perception of the affected host species. For instance, doctors and veterinarians have a mission to treat parasites that infect humans or that impact host species that have some utilitarian or aesthetic value for society. Marine scientists have different concerns than doctors. Although the number of parasites that marine scientists should be concerned about may vary, only 13% of parasites and 6% of host–parasite links might be considered “problematic” in a kelp forest food web. With regard to the many threats to marine ecosystems, these percentages suggest that most parasites and infectious diseases are inconsequential. A related issue is the common expectation that parasites and the impacts that they cause are increasing under stress as ocean environments across the globe degrade. Yet, reports of disease have not increased due to human impacts on the marine environment, where the factors that influence parasitism are more complex. Thus, the expectation that marine parasites create problems, and that the diseases they cause are getting worse, is more likely the exception than the rule.

Book chapter