USGS Science⌕ Search

USGS · 70137558

Causes of varied sediment gravity flow types on the Alsek Prodelta, northeast Gulf of Alaska

Abstract

Slope failures and subsequent mass movements have been identified in Holocene glaciomarine sediment on declivities less than 1.3° on the Alsek prodelta, Gulf of Alaska. Isolated collapse features cover less than 10 percent of a nearshore sand deposit, in water depths less than 40 m. In contrast, sediment gravity flow deposits (disintegrative failures) cover more than 95 percent of a clayey silt deposit that is located in water depths between 35 m and 80 m. The morphology of individual disintegrative failures in the prodelta clayey silt indicates an eastward increase in the internal deformation and downslope translation of the failed sediment mass, the most extreme deformations being relatively large linear depressions up to 6‐m deep, 400‐m wide, and 1800‐m long, extending downslope in the easternmost part of the study area. In‐place cone penetration tests show that the nearshore sand is dense and is probably not highly susceptible to cyclic strength degradation and ultimate slope failure. The isolated collapse features are thought to result from the slope failure of more susceptible clayey silt that underlies the sand, sampled in nearby vibracores. The generation of disintegrative failures on the Alsek prodelta involves a drained conversion of the sediment (pore‐water influx) from an in‐place dense condition (State II) to an expanded condition (State I) during storm‐wave loading. Without this conversion, only nondisintegrative failures, typified by limited internal deformation or minor downslope translation of the failed sediment mass are possible. Higher porosity, underconsolidated, clayey silt of the eastern part of the study area is more susceptible to conversion from State II to State I than is the denser, normally consolidated, clayey silt of the western part of the study area. This trend in the porosity and consolidation state of the sediment is expressed as the eastward increase in the internal deformation and downslope translation of disintegrative failures.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 56.31653672211301° to 60.6301017662667° latitude; -152.8857421875° to -136.80175781249997° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

William C. Schwab, Homa J. Lee, Bruce F. Molnia. 1988. Causes of varied sediment gravity flow types on the Alsek Prodelta, northeast Gulf of Alaska. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641198809388224

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Active diapirism and slope steepening, northern Gulf of Mexico continental slope

Large diapiric and nondiapiric masses of Jurassic salt and Tertiary shale underlie the northern Gulf of Mexico continental slope and adjacent outer continental shelf. Local steepening of the sea floor in response to the vertical growth of these structures is a serious concern to those involved in the site selection and the construction of future oil and gas production and transportation facilities in this frontier petroleum province. The evidence given in this paper supports the conclusion that the present continental slope region of the northern Gulf of Mexico is undergoing active diapirism and consequent slope steepening. Because most of the sediment on the flanks of diapiric structures consists of underconsolidated muds, slumping will take place regularly in response to further diapiric movement.-from Authors

Marine Geotechnology↗

A statistical overview of mass movement characteristics on the North American Atlantic outer continental margin

An analysis of 179 mass movements on the North American Atlantic continental slope and upper rise shows that slope failures have occurred throughout the geographic extent of the outer margin. Although the slope failures show no striking affinity for a particular depth as an origination level, there is a broad, primary mode centered at about 900 m. The resulting slides terminate at almost all depths and have a primary mode at 1100 m, but the slope/rise boundary (at 2200 m) also is an important mode. Slope failures have occurred at declivities ranging from 1° to 30° (typically, 4°); the resultant mass movement deposits vary in width from 0.2 to 50 km (typically, 1–2 km) and in length from 0.3 to 380 km (typically, 2–4 km), and they have been reported to be as thick as 650 m. On a numeric basis, mass movements are slightly more prevalent on open slopes than in other physiographic settings, and both translational and rotational failure surfaces are common. The typical mass movement is disintegrative in nature. Open slope slides tend to occur at lower slope angles and are larger than canyon slides. Further, large‐scale slides rather than small‐scale slides tend to originate on gentle slopes (≍ 3–4°). Rotational slope failures appear to have a slightly greater chance of occurring in canyons, but there is no analogous bias associated with translational failures. Similarly, disintegrative slides seem more likely to be associated with rotational slope failures than translational ones and are longer than their nondisintegrative counterparts. The occurrence of such a variety of mass movements at low declivities implies that a regional failure mechanism has prevailed. We suggest that earthquakes or, perhaps in some areas, gas hydrates are the most likely cause of the slope failures.

Marine Geotechnology↗