USGS Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70131492

Limitations to estimating bacterial cross-speciestransmission using genetic and genomic markers: Inferences from simulation modeling

Julio Andre Benavides·Paul C. Cross·Gordon Luikart·Scott Creel
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Cross‐species transmission (CST) of bacterial pathogens has major implications for human health, livestock, and wildlife management because it determines whether control actions in one species may have subsequent effects on other potential host species. The study of bacterial transmission has benefitted from methods measuring two types of genetic variation: variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). However, it is unclear whether these data can distinguish between different epidemiological scenarios. We used a simulation model with two host species and known transmission rates (within and between species) to evaluate the utility of these markers for inferring CST. We found that CST estimates are biased for a wide range of parameters when based on VNTRs and a most parsimonious reconstructed phylogeny. However, estimations of CST rates lower than 5% can be achieved with relatively low bias using as low as 250 SNPs. CST estimates are sensitive to several parameters, including the number of mutations accumulated since introduction, stochasticity, the genetic difference of strains introduced, and the sampling effort. Our results suggest that, even with whole‐genome sequences, unbiased estimates of CST will be difficult when sampling is limited, mutation rates are low, or for pathogens that were recently introduced.

Explore related subjects

Evolutionary ApplicationsArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Julio Andre Benavides, Paul C. Cross, Gordon Luikart, Scott Creel. 2014-07-23. Limitations to estimating bacterial cross-speciestransmission using genetic and genomic markers: Inferences from simulation modeling. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12173

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Genetic bottleneck and panmixia following the collapse of a Great Lakes lake whitefish fishery

Lake whitefish Coregonus clupeaformis abundance has declined throughout most of the Laurentian Great Lakes in North America for two decades. Current management strategies in Lake Erie assume that there is a single stock of lake whitefish that spawns in the West Basin. There is documented lake whitefish spawning activity throughout the lake, leading to questions about locally adapted genetic stocks. Past research on lake whitefish genetic structure in Lake Erie has supported the single-stock hypothesis, but these studies used only neutral genetic markers or contained a limited number of samples that were collected during the spawning season when stocks would be spatially isolated. Using a GT-seq panel, we evaluate the genetic structure of lake whitefish collected from spawning shoals in the West, Central, and East basins of Lake Erie and compare these populations to lake whitefish from Lake Huron. We then investigate evidence of local adaptation and conduct demographic reconstruction using whole-genome sequencing. Our goals were to conclusively quantify intra-lake genetic structure in Lake Erie and determine whether spawning aggregations possess putatively adaptive variants that could be used for genetic stock identification at a sub-lake level. Our analysis supported the single-stock hypothesis in Lake Erie. However, Lake Erie stocks were distinct from neighboring Lake Huron. Whole-genome analysis did not identify any strong evidence of adaptive loci differentiating stocks. Inference of historic effective population size suggests that declines in lake whitefish populations may have caused a genetic bottleneck. Combined, these results indicate that lake whitefish in Lake Erie may have experienced an Allee Effect after population declines, resulting in a loss of population structure and genetic diversity as spawning shoals were recolonized from a common source.

Michigan, Ohio, Ontario↗
USGS2026

Vegetative propagation preserves genomic diversity and informs translocation strategies in a rare clonal plant

Conservation translocations are widely used to increase population size and redundancy, yet their genetic consequences are often uncertain, particularly for clonal species with unknown rates of sexual reproduction. Propagation through asexual reproduction is frequently employed in these systems, but its effectiveness for preserving genomic diversity remains poorly evaluated. We used genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data to assess the genetic outcomes of translocation efforts in Pleuropogon oregonus , a critically endangered grass endemic to eastern Oregon, USA. We quantified genetic diversity, relatedness, and population structure across natural and introduced sites and used coalescent simulations to infer the divergence history between disjunct populations. Genetic analyses identified two divergent lineages corresponding to northern and southern regions, with divergence predating the last glacial period and limited subsequent gene flow. Within regions, natural populations exhibited high clonality but retained genetically distinct individuals. Introductions that used vegetative propagules from the northern region maintained heterozygosity and allelic diversity comparable to sources and captured multiple distinct genotypes, including alleles likely originating from an unsampled source, thereby increasing population redundancy. In contrast, the introduction derived from a low-diversity, southern region source reflected similarly limited clonal diversity. Our results demonstrate that vegetative propagation can effectively preserve genomic diversity in clonal species when propagules are sampled representatively, but that evolutionary history may inform sourcing and mixing decisions. More broadly, this study provides an empirical framework for integrating genomic data into conservation translocations, highlighting conditions under which vegetative propagation maintains evolutionary potential and when it may pose risks to long-term persistence.

Oregon↗
USGS2026

Epigenetics in captivity: Restoring wild phenotypes in captive-reared salmonids

Captive rearing is a common practice for the stocking, conservation, and supplementation of fish species worldwide, but captive-reared fish can exhibit altered phenotypes leading to reduced fitness in nature compared to wild conspecifics. In salmonids, certain studies have found limited genetic differentiation between wild and captive-reared fish. However, documented changes in gene expression in hatchery fish have led scientists to investigate epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation, as a source of these differences. In this binational collaborative piece, we synthesize the knowledge and efforts of academics and government scientists to highlight how interactions between captive rearing and the epigenome elicit parallel phenotypic changes across salmonid species. We examine the known and potential links between DNA methylation and the phenotypic effects of captive rearing including changes in behavior, color, gut microbiomes, and developmental abnormalities. We review efforts to minimize these phenotypic and epigenetic effects including attempts to modify the hatchery environment and rearing protocols. We provide a framework to integrate epigenetic considerations into hatchery rearing protocols by weighing the heritable nature of DNA methylation with the goals of different captive rearing programs and explore whether minimizing the phenotypic and epigenetic effects of captive rearing is worthwhile. We examine heritability and persistence of epigenetic effects, and we propose the exploitation of heritable bet-hedging as an epigenetic buffer to increase post-release survival. We also suggest novel applications of epigenomic biomarkers as a non-lethal method for post-release monitoring. Ultimately, collaborative multi-disciplinary research across species is needed to understand the comprehensive effects of captive rearing, reduce the ecological impacts of captive fish in the wild, and increase population resilience. Integrating epigenetics into fish hatchery management will provide new opportunities for optimizing and improving captive rearing.

Evolutionary Applications↗