USGS Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70042785

Accounting for non-photosynthetic vegetation in remote-sensing-based estimates of carbon flux in wetlands

Lisa M. Schile·Kristin B. Byrd·Lisamarie Windham-Myers·Maggi Kelly
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Monitoring productivity in coastal wetlands is important due to their high carbon sequestration rates and potential role in climate change mitigation. We tested agricultural- and forest-based methods for estimating the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (f APAR), a key parameter for modelling gross primary productivity (GPP), in a restored, managed wetland with a dense litter layer of non-photosynthetic vegetation, and we compared the difference in canopy light transmission between a tidally influenced wetland and the managed wetland. The presence of litter reduced correlations between spectral vegetation indices and f APAR. In the managed wetland, a two-band vegetation index incorporating simulated World View-2 or Hyperion green and near-infrared bands, collected with a field spectroradiometer, significantly correlated with f APAR only when measured above the litter layer, not at the ground where measurements typically occur. Measures of GPP in these systems are difficult to capture via remote sensing, and require an investment of sampling effort, practical methods for measuring green leaf area and accounting for background effects of litter and water.

Explore related subjects

Remote Sensing LettersArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lisa M. Schile, Kristin B. Byrd, Lisamarie Windham-Myers, Maggi Kelly. 2013. Accounting for non-photosynthetic vegetation in remote-sensing-based estimates of carbon flux in wetlands. https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704x.2013.766372

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2024

Evaluation of classified ground points from National Agriculture Imagery program photogrammetrically derived point clouds

Studies have shown that digital surface models and point clouds generated by the United States Department of Agriculture’s National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) can measure basic forest parameters such as canopy height. However, all measured forest parameters from these studies are evaluated using the differences between NAIP digital surface models (DSMs) and available lidar digital terrain models (DTMs). A survey of NAIP point cloud classification and related ground point-generated DTMs has not yet been undertaken. This study applies a Support Vector Machine (SVM) to classifying ground and nonground points from NAIP point clouds for test sites in Wyoming and Arizona, USA. Light detection and ranging (lidar) data from the U.S. Geological Survey 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) are used to validate the classified NAIP ground points and their corresponding DTMs. Comparing height differences between filtered NAIP ground points and 3DEP ground points, the SVM classifier’s results show that the vertical root mean square error value is 1.87 m and 1.69 m for the Wyoming and Arizona sites, respectively. If NAIP point clouds were continuously measured, the resulting availability of medium-resolution DTMs would benefit the application of multitemporal forest health monitoring and DTM generation.

Remote Sensing Letters↗
USGS2024

Assessing the vertical accuracy of digital elevation models by quality level and land cover

The vertical accuracy of elevation data in coastal environments is critical because small variations in elevation can affect an area’s exposure to waves, tides, and storm-related flooding. Elevation data contractors typically quantify the vertical accuracy of lidar-derived digital elevation models (DEMs) on a per-project basis to gauge whether the datasets meet quality and accuracy standards. Here, we collated over 5200 contractor elevation checkpoints along the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico coasts of the United States that were collected for project-level analyses produced for assessing DEMs acquired for the U.S. Geological Survey’s Three-Dimensional Elevation Program. We used land cover data to quantify non-vegetated vertical accuracy and vegetated vertical accuracy statistics (overall and by point spacing bins) and assessed elevation error by land cover class. We found the non-vegetated vertical accuracy had an overall root mean square error of 6.9 cm and vegetated areas had a 95th percentile vertical error of 22.3 cm. Point spacing was generally positively correlated to elevation accuracy, but sample size limited the ability to interpret results from accuracy by land cover, particularly in wetlands. Based on the specific questions a researcher may be asking, use of literature or fieldwork could assist with enhancing error statistics in underrepresented classes.

Remote Sensing Letters↗
USGS2017

Temporal expansion of annual crop classification layers for the CONUS using the C5 decision tree classifier

Crop cover maps have become widely used in a range of research applications. Multiple crop cover maps have been developed to suite particular research interests. The National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) Cropland Data Layers (CDL) are a series of commonly used crop cover maps for the conterminous United States (CONUS) that span from 2008 to 2013. In this investigation, we sought to contribute to the availability of consistent CONUS crop cover maps by extending temporal coverage of the NASS CDL archive back eight additional years to 2000 by creating annual NASS CDL-like crop cover maps derived from a classification tree model algorithm. We used over 11 million records to train a classification tree algorithm and develop a crop classification model (CCM). The model was used to create crop cover maps for the CONUS for years 2000–2013 at 250 m spatial resolution. The CCM and the maps for years 2008–2013 were assessed for accuracy relative to resampled NASS CDLs. The CCM performed well against a withheld test data set with a model prediction accuracy of over 90%. The assessment of the crop cover maps indicated that the model performed well spatially, placing crop cover pixels within their known domains; however, the model did show a bias towards the ‘Other’ crop cover class, which caused frequent misclassifications of pixels around the periphery of large crop cover patch clusters and of pixels that form small, sparsely dispersed crop cover patches.

Remote Sensing Letters↗