Evidence, models, conservation programs and limits to management

J.D. Nichols

doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00574.x

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70039312

Evidence, models, conservation programs and limits to management

J.D. Nichols

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Walsh et al. (2012) emphasized the importance of obtaining evidence to assess the effects of management actions on state variables relevant to objectives of conservation programs. They focused on malleefowl Leipoa ocellata, ground-dwelling Australian megapodes listed as vulnerable. They noted that although fox Vulpes vulpes baiting is the main management action used in malleefowl conservation throughout southern Australia, evidence of the effectiveness of this action is limited and currently debated. Walsh et al. (2012) then used data from 64 sites monitored for malleefowl and foxes over 23 years to assess key functional relationships relevant to fox control as a conservation action for malleefowl. In one set of analyses, Walsh et al. (2012) focused on two relationships: fox baiting investment versus fox presence, and fox presence versus malleefowl population size and rate of population change. Results led to the counterintuitive conclusion that increases in investments in fox control produced slight decreases in malleefowl population size and growth. In a second set of analyses, Walsh et al. (2012) directly assessed the relationship between investment in fox baiting and malleefowl population size and rate of population change. This set of analyses showed no significant relationship between investment in fox population control and malleefowl population growth. Both sets of analyses benefited from the incorporation of key environmental covariates hypothesized to influence these management relationships. Walsh et al. (2012) concluded that "in most situations, malleefowl conservation did not effectively benefit from fox baiting at current levels of investment." In this commentary, I discuss the work of Walsh et al. (2012) using the conceptual framework of structured decision making (SDM). In doing so, I accept their analytic results and associated conclusions as accurate and discuss basic ideas about evidence, conservation and limits to management.

Explore related subjects

Animal Conservation Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

J.D. Nichols. 2012-07-04. Evidence, models, conservation programs and limits to management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00574.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

The rising threat of lead: Trends in fatalities of California condors

Endangered species face threats that change over time, and understanding variation in the importance of threats is valuable for guiding species recovery. The reintroduced population of critically endangered California condors has faced a number of threats over the three decades since the species was first released back to the wild. We modeled interannual and interseasonal trends in the leading causes of death for wild condors. Our analysis showed strong evidence ( P = 0.971) that the estimated annual probability of death from lead toxicosis has increased since reintroduction started. This increase was most pronounced in the central California subpopulation. Adults were disproportionately affected by lead toxicosis, a trend that may be explained by increased exposure associated with age-related changes in foraging behavior that lead to decreased reliance on clean proffered food sources. Population-level mortality from trauma showed a temporary increase in 2012, and fire-related mortality was higher during the summer months. Pattens also varied across subpopulations, with the southern California subpopulation of condors showing distinct temporal peaks in deaths from trauma (in 2012) and predation (in 2010). Our analysis suggests that threats to condors have not been static over space and time. Managers can therefore use this information to adaptively manage and target mitigation efforts when and where they are the most effective.

California↗

USGS2025

Integrated species distribution model using historical data shows decline in a common semi-aquatic mammal

Effective conservation requires an understanding of drivers of a species' distribution as well as long-term changes in their distribution. In recent decades, advances in data collection and analysis have allowed researchers to integrate a wide range of information to model species distributions, particularly by allowing presence-only data and detection-nondetection data to be formally combined in integrated species distribution models (ISDMs). However, these models are rarely used to investigate long-term trends, which are important in evaluating a species' status. Here, we use historical presence-only data of river otters ( Lontra canadensis ; 366 latrine locations from 1999 to 2007 and 105 locations of road-killed individuals recorded from 1999 to 2020) and 919 detection-nondetection surveys from 230 sites between 2021 and 2023 to understand the current distribution of river otters in Rhode Island, USA, as well as the changes in river otter distribution over the past two decades. We found that river otters were strongly associated with key habitat features such as streams and water, positively associated with urban areas, and tolerant of some contaminants, such as lead. Furthermore, despite uncertainties in historical river otter occurrence, we found clear supporting evidence that river otter intensity of use had declined from 1999 to 2023. This decline occurred despite being protected from harvest and in contrast to range expansions in other parts of the northeastern USA throughout the second half of the 20th century. Our results suggest the utility of this approach to detect declines in species for which historical data are available and a need for better understanding the cause of river otter declines. Where monitoring consists of opportunistically collected data, species conservation could benefit by continuing to collect these data as well as introducing designed surveys, as this would allow better integration of data types, improving trend estimation and reducing the amount of (typically more expensive) designed surveys needed.

Rhode Island↗

USGS2025

Breeder turnover, harvest, and food affect recruitment of young nonbreeders in groups of gray wolves

Groups of cooperative breeders typically have social hierarchies, with breeders at the top guiding group decisions and influencing the behavior of subordinates in the group. Because of breeders' strong influence on group dynamics and behaviors, breeder turnover can affect the survival of remaining group members. We lack a solid understanding of the nuanced but important effects of breeder turnover on group composition. I first asked how harvest (i.e., hunting and trapping) affected rates of breeder turnover in groups of gray wolves ( Canis lupus ) in Idaho, USA, from 2008 to 2020. Then, I asked how breeder turnover, group size, and food availability affected the recruitment of 1- and 2-year-old nonbreeders into groups. Harvest was associated with an increase in breeding female, but not breeding male, turnover. Breeding female turnover was negatively associated with the probability of 1-year-old, but not 2-year-old, nonbreeders being in a group the following year. The only significant variable associated with the recruitment of 2-year-old nonbreeders into groups was sex, as males were less likely than females to be present in groups at time (t+1) . Finally, an index of prey biomass was positively associated with the probability of 1-year-olds being present in groups at time (t+1) (i.e., apparent pup survival to age 1). I show that harvest, social factors such as breeder turnover, and food availability influence the presence of young nonbreeders in groups, ultimately affecting group composition in a cooperative breeder.

Idaho↗