USGS Science⌕ Search

USGS · 70027447

Preliminary characterisation of new glass reference materials (GSA-1G, GSC-1G, GSD-1G and GSE-1G) by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry using 193 nm, 213 nm and 266 nm wavelengths

Abstract

New glass reference materials GSA-1G, GSC-1G, GSD-1G and GSE-1G have been characterised using a prototype solid state laser ablation system capable of producing wavelengths of 193 nm, 213 nm and 266 nm. This system allowed comparison of the effects of different laser wavelengths under nearly identical ablation and ICP operating conditions. The wavelengths 213 nm and 266 nm were also used at higher energy densities to evaluate the influence of energy density on quantitative analysis. In addition, the glass reference materials were analysed using commercially available 266 nm Nd:YAG and 193 nm ArF excimer lasers. Laser ablation analysis was carried out using both single spot and scanning mode ablation. Using laser ablation ICP-MS, concentrations of fifty-eight elements were determined with external calibration to the NIST SRM 610 glass reference material. Instead of applying the more common internal standardisation procedure, the total concentration of all element oxide concentrations was normalised to 100%. Major element concentrations were compared with those determined by electron microprobe. In addition to NIST SRM 610 for external calibration, USGS BCR-2G was used as a more closely matrix-matched reference material in order to compare the effect of matrix-matched and non matrix-matched calibration on quantitative analysis. The results show that the various laser wavelengths and energy densities applied produced similar results, with the exception of scanning mode ablation at 266 nm without matrix-matched calibration where deviations up to 60% from the average were found. However, results acquired using a scanning mode with a matrix-matched calibration agreed with results obtained by spot analysis. The increased abundance of large particles produced when using a scanning ablation mode with NIST SRM 610, is responsible for elemental fractionation effects caused by incomplete vaporisation of large particles in the ICP.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M. Guillong, K. Hametner, E. Reusser, Stephen A. Wilson, D. Gunther. 2005. Preliminary characterisation of new glass reference materials (GSA-1G, GSC-1G, GSD-1G and GSE-1G) by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry using 193 nm, 213 nm and 266 nm wavelengths. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908x.2005.tb00903.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Triple oxygen isotope compositions of isotopic reference waters: Implications for VSMOW-Scale and VSMOW-SLAP-Scale Δ′¹⁷O calibration

Triple oxygen isotope ratios of waters are commonly reported on the VSMOW–SLAP scale, whereas comparison with theoretical calculations and assessment of instrumental scale distortion require accurate constraints on the measured isotopic compositions of the primary isotopic reference materials (iRMs) themselves. In particular, the measured δ 17 O VSMOW and Δ ′ 17 O VSMOW values for SLAP and its substitute, SLAP2, remain insufficiently constrained and reported values differ among laboratories. Here, we measured triple oxygen isotope ratios for two primary iRMs (VSMOW and SLAP) and twelve secondary iRMs (VSMOW2, SLAP2, GISP, GRESP, USGS45, USGS46, USGS46a, USGS47, USGS48, USGS49, USGS50 and USGS53) using BrF 5 fluorination and dual-inlet isotope-ratio mass spectrometry. For SLAP, we obtained δ 18 O VSMOW = -55.50 ± 0.15‰ and δ 17 O VSMOW = -29.66 ± 0.08‰, giving Δ ′ 17 O VSMOW = 34 ± 6 per meg (all expanded uncertainties, k = 2). The corresponding values for SLAP2 agree within uncertainty. When expressed on the conventional VSMOW–SLAP scale, our Δ ′ 17 O VSMOW–SLAP values for all secondary iRMs with available literature values agree with previously published values within uncertainty, confirming interlaboratory comparability on that scale. In contrast, waters with low δ 18 O values, Δ ′ 17 O VSMOW values are systematically higher than the corresponding Δ ′ 17 O VSMOW–SLAP values. These results further suggest that accurate determination of the VSMOW-scale isotopic composition of SLAP and/or SLAP2 across laboratories is essential, particularly for low- δ 18 O samples, for which the difference between VSMOW-scale and VSMOW–SLAP-scale Δ ′ 17 O values becomes large, and for meaningful comparison between measured data and theoretical calculations.

Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research↗

RioM-1: A new calcite reference material for U-Pb LA-ICP-MS geochronology

Determining absolute ages of carbonate diagenesis, faulting, fossil formation, speleothem growth, carbonate-hosted hydrocarbon deposits, vein mineralisation and hydrothermal alteration has become increasingly accessible through LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating of calcite, complementing traditional isotope dilution methods still applicable to certain materials (e.g., speleothems via micro-drilling). However, well-calibrated reference materials for LA-ICP-MS calcite geochronology remain scarce. Here, we characterise the Rio Maior calcite, designated ‘RioM-1’, as a potential reference material for U-Pb dating by LA-ICP-MS. Fragments (0.1 to 1 cm 3 ) from a single scalenohedral crystal were analysed by ID-TIMS (U-Pb), LA-ICP-MS (U-Pb and 87 Sr/ 86 Sr), and SIMS (O isotopes). RioM-1 displays high U mass fraction and low, though variable, proportions of common Pb. Combined ID-TIMS analyses from two independent laboratories yielded a Tera-Wasserburg lower intercept date of 63.93 ± 0.11 Ma (2 s , MSWD = 1.3, n = 16). LA-ICP-MS U-Pb data from three independent laboratories are concordant with the TIMS age, producing a pooled date of 64.10 ± 0.12/1.2 Ma (2 s , MSWD = 7.7, n = 708) and an initial 207 Pb/ 206 Pb ratio of 0.85 ± 0.01. Other calcite reference materials, when normalised to RioM-1, yielded dates within uncertainty of their published values. SIMS measurements returned a mean 18 O/ 16 O of 0.002044450 ± 181 (1 s ) and δ 18 O SMOW of 19.57 ± 0.92‰ (1 s ), while LA-ICP-MS strontium isotope measurement yielded a mean 87 Sr/ 86 Sr of 0.708177 ± 9 (2 s ).

Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research↗

Using peak geometry and shifts in the x-ray spectrum of carbon from electron probe microanalysis to determine thermal maturity of organic matter

During the burial of mudstones, the associated organic matter undergoes gradual thermal maturation, a key process that can influence the reactivity of organic matter during catagenesis, the formation of hydrocarbon deposits and the chemical weathering of mudstones. Conventional methods for assessing the thermal maturity of organic matter often fail to reflect the geochemical heterogeneity between individual organic phases in mudstone samples. Here, we report an alternative, non-destructive, surficial and micro-scale (analytical spot size of ~ 300 nm with about 4 μm diffusion depth for micrometre-size organic grains) method to evaluate the thermal maturity of organic matter in mudstones using the carbon K α X-ray spectrum measured by field emission-electron probe microanalyser (FE-EPMA). Using this method, we observed correlations between parameter values derived from FE-EPMA spectra, including the peak position, the peak area and the intra-sample heterogeneity of these measurements, and independently measured vitrinite/solid bitumen reflectance for a suite of mudstones, representing different age, geological context and burial depth. With the increased values in peak area and position, we identified an increase in the carbon mass fraction of organic matter and the mean nominal oxidation state of carbon approaching zero. These trends, which are consistent with aromatisation and graphitisation, provide the rationale for using FE-EPMA to estimate the thermal maturity of organic matter. To explore some of these trends in more detail, we employed time-of-flight secondary ionisation mass spectrometry, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and optical reflectance measurements on a subset of samples.

Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research↗