USGS ScienceSearch

USGS · 70022962

Corticosterone facilitates begging and affects resource allocation in the black-legged kittiwake

Abstract

Parent black-legged kittiwakes ( Rissa tridactyla ) and their dependent chicks respond to food shortages by increasing circulating levels of corticosterone. To examine the behavioral significance of corticosterone release, we experimentally increased levels of circulating corticosterone in parents and chicks up to the levels observed during food shortages. We found that corticosterone-implanted chicks begged more frequently than sham-implanted controls. Corticosterone-implanted chicks in broods of two begged more frequently than singletons. Parent kittiwakes then responded to the increase in corticosterone levels in their chicks by increasing chick-feeding rates. However, feeding rates were not different among corticosterone-implanted chicks in broods of two and singletons. We also found that corticosterone-implanted parents spent more time away from the nest—perhaps foraging—and less time brooding/guarding chicks than sham-implanted controls. Untreated mates of the corticosterone-implanted bird did not compensate for the change in their partner's behavior; consequently, chicks were left unattended about 20% of the time compared to 1% at the control nests. However, corticosterone-implanted parents did not decrease their chick-feeding rates. Our findings suggest two functional implications of the increased corticosterone secretion during food shortages in the black-legged kittiwake: it facilitates begging in chicks, and it affects time allocated by parents to guarding young at the nest. Thus, release of corticosterone might provide a mechanistic link between physiological condition and behavioral interactions among adults and their young.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alexander S Kitaysky, John C. Wingfield, John F. Piatt. 2001. Corticosterone facilitates begging and affects resource allocation in the black-legged kittiwake. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco%2F12.5.619

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Growth, movement, and survival of precocial shorebird chicks are constrained by their environment.

Young animals are often less mobile than adults, while also having high energetic demands. They may therefore be more vulnerable to local-scale changes in environmental conditions. In particular, when 1 sex must grow more rapidly than the other to achieve a larger adult size, that sex may experience especially dramatic reductions in growth and survival in the face of suboptimal environmental conditions. In order to investigate the flexibility of individuals in response to local-scale environmental variation during development, we studied the sex-specific growth, movement, and survival of Hudsonian Godwit ( Limosa haemastica ) chicks—a sexually dimorphic, precocial shorebird that breeds in the sub-Arctic and exhibits a male-skewed adult sex ratio. We found that female chicks—which must grow to a larger adult size—reached their maximum growth rates at a later age, but had similar growth rates to males before that and survived equally well to 21 days. We also found that, irrespective of sex, chicks had reduced movement rates when they were young and/or temperatures were cold, and only weakly increased their movement rates when invertebrate abundances remained low across an entire week. Early in life, godwit chicks may therefore be constrained from increasing their foraging efforts by local environmental conditions, forcing females to sustain higher growth rates late in the season past the local resource peak. Such sex-specific vulnerabilities could lead to lower early-life survival and, in turn, skewed adult sex ratios, which have important implications for population dynamics and persistence.

Behavioral Ecology

Drivers of disperser immigration into cooperatively breeding carnivore groups

Dispersal is a fundamental process that shapes social groups by affecting genetic diversity, group composition, and social dynamics through immigration and subsequent settlement. In group-living animals, dispersal involves more than just leaving 1 group and arriving at another because dispersers also need to be accepted at an established group for successful dispersal to occur. Understanding how and why new individuals integrate into established social groups remains a key question, particularly when the benefits to existing members are unclear. This question persists in part because the ecological and social conditions that shape disperser settlement remain poorly understood. We leveraged an existing harvest regime and examined 18 years of life-history data from a wild population of cooperatively breeding gray wolves ( Canis lupus ) to understand immigration dynamics of group-living. Specifically, we tested how social and environmental conditions within groups predicted the likelihood that a disperser successfully immigrated into a group, analyzing how breeder turnover, annual harvest, group size, and genetic relatedness influenced that decision. Turnover of breeding males had the strongest effect on the probability of disperser settlement, suggesting that the loss of key social roles may create opportunities for new individuals to join groups. We also found an interaction between group size and harvest. By quantifying conditions that shape immigrant settlement, we highlight a mechanism influencing the stability and structure of cooperatively breeding groups. Unlike studies focused on individual dispersal decisions, our research highlights how variation in ecological and social conditions shape settlement into groups by dispersers.

Idaho

Causes of differential migration distance: Test of seven mechanistic hypotheses in an arctic raptor

Exploring the causes of differential migration, or variation in migration distance, has increased our understanding of the remarkable variation in migratory behavior exhibited by birds more generally. However, considerable uncertainty exists regarding the mechanisms underlying differential migration distance in birds despite it being a common phenomenon. We leveraged migration distances from GPS-tracked rough-legged hawks Buteo lagopus to test predictions deduced from seven hypotheses proposed to explain the underlying cause(s) of differential migration distance. We provide the first empirical evidence in support of a social dominance food maximization hypothesis whereby dominant individuals migrate to higher quality nonbreeding locations with respect to foraging efficiency regardless of migration distance. Within females, larger more dominant individuals migrated intermediate distances while smaller, subordinate individuals migrated both longer and shorter distances. We also found support for the social dominance distance minimization hypothesis because more aggressive females migrated shorter distances, although increased aggression at shorter distances may be a consequence of poor body condition. Within males, we found some support for the fasting endurance and thermal tolerance hypotheses because body size was negatively correlated with migration distance. Body size was also negatively correlated with food availability and winter minimum temperatures within both sexes, providing additional mechanistic support for the fasting endurance and thermal tolerance hypotheses. Overall, our results suggest differential migration distance within rough-legged hawks is caused by a combination of competition for nonbreeding resources and constraints on fasting endurance or thermal tolerance, but is unrelated to competition for breeding opportunities, dietary preferences, or flight efficiency.

Behavioral Ecology