USGS Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70022479

Assessing land-use impacts on biodiversity using an expert systems tool

P.J. Crist·T.W. Kohley·J. Oakleaf
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Habitat alteration, in the form of land-use development, is a leading cause of biodiversity loss in the U.S. and elsewhere. Although statutes in the U.S. may require consideration of biodiversity in local land-use planning and regulation, local governments lack the data, resources, and expertise to routinely consider biotic impacts that result from permitted land uses. We hypothesized that decision support systems could aid solution of this problem. We developed a pilot biodiversity expert systems tool (BEST) to test that hypothesis and learn what additional scientific and technological advancements are required for broad implementation of such a system. BEST uses data from the U.S. Geological Survey's Gap Analysis Program (GAP) and other data in a desktop GIS environment. The system provides predictions of conflict between proposed land uses and biotic elements and is intended for use at the start of the development review process. Key challenges were the development of categorization systems that relate named land-use types to ecological impacts, and relate sensitivities of biota to ecological impact levels. Although the advent of GAP and sophisticated desktop GIS make such a system feasible for broad implementation, considerable ongoing research is required to make the results of such a system scientifically sound, informative, and reliable for the regulatory process. We define a role for local government involvement in biodiversity impact assessment, the need for a biodiversity decision support system, the development of a prototype system, and scientific needs for broad implementation of a robust and reliable system.

Explore related subjects

Landscape EcologyArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P.J. Crist, T.W. Kohley, J. Oakleaf. 2000. Assessing land-use impacts on biodiversity using an expert systems tool. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1008117427864

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Ecological diffusion models are still useful in ecology

Context Connecting animal movement across scales—both among spatial scales and between individual and population level processes—is a central theme in ecology, including the sub-fields of movement and landscape ecology. However, most modeling frameworks operate at either the individual (Lagrangian) or population (Eulerian) level. Objectives We aimed to review how a partial differential equation (PDE) known as the ecological diffusion equation (EDE) offers connections among the scales of animal movement and how it can be embedded in commonly used statistical frameworks (e.g., hierarchical models) and fit to multiple types of data, such as count, presence-only, presence-absence, and telemetry data. In doing so, we also highlight emerging and promising avenues of research related to statistical EDE models. Methods We present how the EDE is derived from a simple set of first principles, can be used to represent both individual animal movement and spatiotemporal population dynamics, and can be fit to data by being applied in a hierarchical statistical framework. Finally, we review literature on recent applications and advances related to EDE models. Results In presenting the derivation of the EDE and reviewing recent advances and applications of EDE models, we established that the EDE can enable a mechanistic understanding of animal movement across scales, as well as the integration of multiple types of data. We also identified a number of topics where EDE models can be advanced to gain additional ecological insight. Conclusions Ecological diffusion is a process that emerges naturally from first principles governing animal movement and can be used to model both individual and population-level spatiotemporal dynamics. Statistical EDE models are related to other modeling frameworks, such as species distribution models, occupancy models, and step-selection analysis. The flexibility of hierarchical statistical modeling allows combining different types of data collected on movement and population dynamics, and the theoretical underpinnings of the EDE allow it to connect ecological processes occurring at fine and coarse spatial scales, as well as individual animal movement and population dynamics.

Landscape Ecology↗
USGS2026

Assessing environmental influences on gene flow for a migratory ungulate in a fire-prone landscape

Context Migratory species traverse long distances across complex landscape mosaics. Shifts in environmental attributes across space and time could affect movement paths and genetic connectivity of migratory species. Objectives We identified boundaries to genetic connectivity based on population structure and evaluated environmental influences on gene flow in a migratory ungulate. We projected how genetic connectivity might be affected by actual wildfire events. Methods We collected over 168,400 GPS locations for 97 bighorn sheep ( Ovis canadensis ) and estimated kinship with 5,140 single nucleotide polymorphisms for 95 individuals. We identified subpopulations and employed machine-learning optimization to evaluate how environmental attributes affect gene flow between them. We projected future genetic connectivity based on recent landscape changes. Results We observed that water bodies and > 70% canopy cover may limit effective dispersal, suggesting that shifts in these landscape attributes, influenced by climate and vegetation management, may affect future gene flow. We also predicted recent wildfire events will change gene flow between three subpopulations, predicting more flow where fire reduced canopy cover at a pinchpoint near a linear lake and less flow where fire was internal to the subpopulation. Conclusions Modifications in canopy cover could be applied to facilitate or impede connectivity and gene flow, depending on management goals. Large, semi-linear lakes could form movement barriers in other bighorn populations. Recent wildfires will likely increase gene flow between semi-isolated subpopulations, with implications for disease management. As wildfire and tree encroachment and densification increase, gene flow between other spatially structured populations in similar landscapes may shift.

British Columbia, Montana↗
USGS2026

Local, regional, and coastwide effects of interactions between storms and relative position in tidal frame on Louisiana coastal marshes

Context In coastal wetlands, land area is dynamic in both space and time, and it is crucial to understand the factors that may tip the balance between wetland area loss and gain. Flooding has been shown to be a key regulator of wetland resilience to land loss through effects on vegetation health and productivity. However, the relationship between elevation and land change is complex, likely interacting with lateral processes such as edge erosion to influence land change rates. Objectives We sought to determine the role of storms, major drivers of lateral erosion, to help explain the complex relationships between elevation and land change at multiple spatial scales and improve predictions of wetland loss. Methods We used long-term records of elevation change, water elevation, and surface wind stress together with remotely sensed land-area change datasets to determine the factors that contribute to land loss in Louisiana (USA) coastal wetlands. Results Our results illustrate that wetland elevation alone cannot be used as a predictor of land change. Annual time-integrated wind stress, which we used as an indicator of storminess, is an important predictor of land change and interacts with elevation to impact wetland gain or loss. The data showed high site-level variation, indicating that local factors strongly determine land change. Nonetheless, we were able to identify broad generalities at the larger scales. We found that the interaction of flooding and storminess varied among geographic regions along the coast. In the Delta Plain region of the coast, sites that are frequently flooded (low elevation) were more likely to experience land gain in stormy years and land loss in calm years. Conversely, sites that were frequently drained (high elevation) had greater land loss during stormy years, presumably due to wind-wave erosion. This trend was not observed in the heavily managed Chenier Plain region, where perpetually flooded wetlands gained land during stormy years, likely due to wind-driven drainage of the marsh. Conclusion Together, these results illustrate that models of wetland vulnerability based upon elevation change or storm effects alone are too simple and will not capture observed trends in land change. Incorporating additional factors such as wind stress and management status can improve predictions of coastal wetland loss and our understanding of the mechanisms controlling resilience of these ecosystems.

Louisiana↗