USGS Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70016543

Use of the Priestley-Taylor evaporation equation for soil water limited conditions in a small forest clearcut

Alan L. Flint·S.W. Childs
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Priestley-Taylor equation, a simplification of the Penman equation, was used to allow calculations of evapotranspiration under conditions where soil water supply limits evapotranspiration. The Priestley-Taylor coefficient, α, was calculated to incorporate an exponential decrease in evapotranspiration as soil water content decreases. The method is appropriate for use when detailed meteorological measurements are not available. The data required to determine the parameter for the α coefficient are net radiation, soil heat flux, average air temperature, and soil water content. These values can be obtained from measurements or models. The dataset used in this report pertains to a partially vegetated clearcut forest site in southwest Oregon with soil depths ranging from 0.48 to 0.70 m and weathered bedrock below that. Evapotranspiration was estimated using the Bowen ratio method, and the calculated Priestley-Taylor coefficient was fitted to these estimates by nonlinear regression. The calculated Priestley-Taylor coefficient (α′) was found to be approximately 0.9 when the soil was near field capacity (0.225 cm 3 cm −3 ). It was not until soil water content was less than 0.14 cm 3 cm −3 that soil water supply limited evapotranspiration. The soil reached a final residual water content near 0.05 cm 3 cm −3 at the end of the growing season.

Explore related subjects

Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alan L. Flint, S.W. Childs. 1991. Use of the Priestley-Taylor evaporation equation for soil water limited conditions in a small forest clearcut. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(91)90094-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Lowland tropical forests remain a methane sink under warming and long-term hurricane disturbance recovery

Methane (CH 4 ) is a potent greenhouse gas, and tropical forests account for roughly one–third of global atmospheric CH 4 uptake by soils. Projected warming and more frequent hurricanes in these ecosystems may alter soil CH 4 sink strength, as warmer and wetter soils enhance methanogenesis activity. We measured soil CH 4 and CO 2 efflux during the calendar summer months of 2023 and 2024 alongside continuous records of soil moisture, soil and air temperature, and precipitation in an in–situ warming experiment (TRACE) located in a lowland tropical forest in Puerto Rico, six to seven years after Hurricanes Irma and Maria (2017). The realized warming (∼1.95°C) enhanced soil respiration only in summer 2023 ( p < 0.05), but net soil CH 4 uptake was invariant in both campaigns ( p > 0.05). Instead, sampling day and between–plot variability explained soil CH 4 dynamics much more than treatment contrasts. Importantly, CH 4 uptake was consistently coupled to CO 2 efflux, suggesting tight linkages between methanotrophic and heterotrophic activities. Between treatments, CH 4 and CO 2 responses to soil temperature variation were less sensitive in warmed plots, which may suggest weak metabolic upregulation under elevated temperatures. Together, these findings indicate that lowland tropical soils remain CH 4 sink even under warming and years after hurricane disturbance, with CH 4 dynamics driven more by spatial and temporal variability than experimental warming. Long–term, high–resolution monitoring integrating soil biogeochemistry and microbial processes will be critical to determine whether the observed net CH 4 uptake signal represents a sustainable or transient response under continued warming and disturbance.

Puerto Rico, Sabana Field Research Station↗
USGS2025

Network of networks: Time series clustering of AmeriFlux sites

Environmental observation networks, such as AmeriFlux, are foundational for monitoring ecosystem response to climate change, management practices, and natural disturbances; however, their effectiveness depends on their representativeness for the regions or continents. We proposed an empirical, time series approach to quantify the similarity of ecosystem fluxes across AmeriFlux sites. We extracted the diel and seasonal characteristics (i.e., amplitudes, phases) from carbon dioxide, water vapor, energy, and momentum fluxes, which reflect the effects of climate, plant phenology, and ecophysiology on the observations, and explored the potential aggregations of AmeriFlux sites through hierarchical clustering. While net radiation and temperature showed latitudinal clustering as expected, flux variables revealed a more uneven clustering with many small (number of sites < 5), unique groups and a few large (> 100) to intermediate (15–70) groups, highlighting the significant ecological regulations of ecosystem fluxes. Many identified unique groups were from under-sampled ecoregions and biome types of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP), with distinct flux dynamics compared to the rest of the network. At the finer spatial scale, local topography, disturbance, management, edaphic, and hydrological regimes further enlarge the difference in flux dynamics within the groups. Nonetheless, our clustering approach is a data-driven method to interpret the AmeriFlux network, informing future cross-site syntheses, upscaling, and model-data benchmarking research. Finally, we highlighted the unique and underrepresented sites in the AmeriFlux network, which were found mainly in Hawaii and Latin America, mountains, and at under-sampled IGBP types (e.g., urban, open water), motivating the incorporation of new/unregistered sites from these groups.

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology↗
USGS2025

Beyond optimality: Dryland ecosystems infrequently use water efficiently for carbon gain

Optimality theory assumes plants maximize carbon gain per unit water lost and is often implemented to scale leaf-level carbon gain and water use to regional and global scales. Optimality theory is often mathematically represented by assuming plant water-use efficiency (WUE) scales with VPD k , where k = ½ represents expected optimal behavior. It is unclear, however, if this relationship holds in arid and semi-arid ecosystems that are strongly impacted by soil and atmospheric moisture status. We used data from seven flux tower sites along an aridity gradient in New Mexico to answer: how does the relationship between WUE and VPD compare to expectations based on optimality theory? To address this question, we integrated the Dynamic Evapotranspiration Partitioning Approach for Rapid Timescales with a stochastic antecedent model to estimate ecosystem-level WUE (GPP/T) and the net sensitivity of WUE to VPD, or k Dynamic , which we compare to the theoretical optimal sensitivity of k = ½. Our results show that optimality theory is not always appropriate, and k Dynamic often deviates from ½, especially at some of the more arid sites or during periods of low soil moisture. At less arid, higher elevation sites, k Dynamic is most consistent with optimality theory at moderate VPD levels, but not at high VPD. In general, the sensitivity of WUE to VPD is highly variable such that k Dynamic exhibits notable daily and seasonal variability, suggesting highly dynamic stomatal behavior. These results emphasize that representing plant water-use strategies as dynamic in time and space is critical to improving large-scale estimates of plant water use.

New Mexico↗