USGS Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70012873

A Model of Regional Ground-Water Flow in Secondary-Permeability Terrane

J. M. Gerhart
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The ground-water flow system in the Lower Susquehanna River Basin in Pennsylvania and Maryland can be considered as one complex unconfined aquifer in which secondary porosity and permeability are the dominant influences on the occurrence and flow of ground water. The degree of development of secondary porosity and permeability in the various lithologies of the lower basin determines the aquifer characteristics of each lithology. Based on qualitative evidence, the use of a porous-media model was assumed to be appropriate on a regional scale and a finite-difference ground-water flow model was constructed for the lower basin. The conceptual model of ground-water flow in the lower basin incorporates the major features of the flow system. Through the use of two layers, 21 hydrogeologic units, and five topographic settings, the conceptual model was systematically reduced to arrive at a simplified conceptual model. Further reduction produced a numerical model representation of the conceptual model, in which the essential features of the lower-basin flow system were quantified for input into the numerical model. The model was calibrated under both steady-state and transient conditions, and was used to evaluate the water-supply potential of the 21 hydrogeologic units. The carbonate units have the greatest potential for ground-water development and the Triassic sedimentary and crystalline units have the least potential. A total ground-water yield potential of about 900 million gallons per day could be obtained from the lower basin with a consequent 50-percent reduction of base flow in streams.

Explore related subjects

GroundwaterArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J. M. Gerhart. 2006-03-21. A Model of Regional Ground-Water Flow in Secondary-Permeability Terrane. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1984.tb01486.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Computing flow-field distortion coefficients from well-construction and formation properties

Direct measurements of groundwater velocity made with borehole flowmeters in screened wells must be compensated for the effects of flow-field distortion (also known as borehole acceleration). A theoretical equation developed by Drost et al. (1968) and simple inputs describing hydraulic properties of well construction and geologic formation were programmed into an Excel workbook to facilitate computation by groundwater-flowmeter users. Tables describing the physical and hydraulic properties for well constructions and gravel pack media are provided with an example to facilitate use of the workbook. Groundwater flowlines converge or diverge as they pass from a geologic formation, through a gravel pack and well screen. The extent of flowline convergence or divergence and the value of the flow-field distortion coefficient is related to the relative changes in hydraulic conductivity of the well screen, gravel pack, and geologic formation. Convergence or divergence is accompanied by acceleration or deceleration of groundwater. Direct measurements of groundwater velocity at the center of the monitoring well can be adjusted to provide a more accurate estimate of velocity in the formation by applying a correction for flow-field distortion. Variables required to compute the flow-field distortion coefficient include the hydraulic conductivity of the gravel pack, well screen, and the geologic formation surrounding the well screen; the borehole radius, and the inside radius and outside radius of the well screen.

Groundwater↗
USGS2026

Predicting groundwater hydrochemical facies in three dimensions with random forest classification, USA

A random forest classification (RFC) model was developed to predict hydrochemical facies (HCFs) of groundwater in three dimensions across the conterminous United States (CONUS). Major-ion data from 152,673 sites were used to categorize groundwater into one of six HCFs (CaMg-HCO 3 , NaK-HCO 3 , CaMg-SO 4 , NaK-SO 4 , Cl, or Mixed). These six HCFs were used as targets for RFC modeling. Model features that represent relevant geochemical processes and/or physical conditions were derived from previously published data. Additional model features were specifically engineered to support this analysis: elevation of the bottom of a well relative to the base of drinking water (ERDW) and six flags that relate geologic units to HCFs. The most important model feature was ERDW. The model was used to map HCFs at a 1-km 2 resolution across CONUS and to depths of 400 m below the base of drinking water (which varies from 22 m to 2 km). Model predictions are consistent with expectations. CaMg-HCO 3 is predicted to occur near the water table in more humid settings, and areas underlain by carbonate or crystalline rocks. At depths below the base of drinking-water supplies, the model predicts a rapid transition from HCO 3 HCFs to Cl. Model predictions are accurate based on point data, and data averaged across hydrogeologic regions and with depth. Model predictions of HCFs could be used for multiple purposes, including the mapping of salinity and other groundwater characteristics.

Groundwater↗