USGS · 70011939
Aseismic uplift in California
Abstract
We disagree with several of the arguments cited by Jackson et al . in support of their view that "the inference of wide-spread aseismic uplift in southern California is not justified" (1). Specifically, the striking correlation shown in figure 1 of Jackson et al . (1) is an artifact of the construction, the rod calibration data are atypical, the cited regression techniques are of doubtful value, and the geologically and geodetically determined uplift rates are inappropriately compared.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Robert O. Castle, Michael R. Elliot, Thomas D. Gilmore, Robert K. Mark, Evelyn B. Newman, John C. Tinsley, D.D. Jackson, W.B. Lee, C.-C. Liu. 1981. Aseismic uplift in California. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.213.4504.246
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.