USGS Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70011368

Platinum-group elements in rocks from the voikar-syninsky ophiolite complex, Polar Urals, U.S.S.R.

N.J. Page·P. J. Aruscavage·J. Haffty
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Analyses of platinum-group elements (PGE) in rocks collected from the Voikar-Syninsky ophiolite in the Polar Urals suggest that the distribution and geochemistry of PGE in this Paleozoic ophiolite are similar to those in Mesozoic ophiolites from elsewhere. Chondrite-normalized PGE patterns for chromitite, the tectonite unit, and ultramafic and mafic cumulate unit have negative slopes. These results are similar to those found for chromitites from other ophiolites; stratiform chromities show positive slopes. If the magmas that form both types of chromitite originate from similar mantle source material with respect to PGE content, the processes involved must be quite different. However, the distinct chondrite-normalized PGE patterns may reflect differing source materials. ?? 1983 Springer-Verlag.

Explore related subjects

Mineralium DepositaArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N.J. Page, P. J. Aruscavage, J. Haffty. 1983. Platinum-group elements in rocks from the voikar-syninsky ophiolite complex, Polar Urals, U.S.S.R.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00204489

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

The use of fluorite geochemistry and machine learning to identify critical mineral systems

Fluorite (CaF 2 ) is a potential pathfinder to critical mineral and rare earth element (REE) deposits but its application has been limited to a narrow range of mineralization types. I show that fluorite is a robust recorder of mineralization fertility by applying statistical and machine-learning methods to a new global fluorite geochemical database. Distinct median rare earth and trace element patterns are observed among deposit types and genetic environments. Fluorite associated with carbonatites and REE deposits are relatively enriched in Sr and have minimal Eu anomalies. These characteristics define new bivariate discrimination diagrams that correctly identify 78% of carbonatite-related fluorite and 88% of fluorite from REE deposits. Random forest classifiers were developed for a wide range of mineralization types and genetic settings. Trained solely on rare earth element patterns, these models achieve accuracies of 77–79%. Higher classification accuracies (up to 88–96%) are obtained when including elements such as Sr, highlighting the significance of trace elements for optimal fluorite classification. The recognition of diagnostic fluorite compositional fingerprints, particularly in REE-fertile systems, underscores its potential as a pathfinder and indicator for critical mineral exploration in F-bearing environments.

Mineralium Deposita↗
USGS2026

Introduction to the special issue on pegmatite-hosted Li-Cs-Ta-Sn deposits

This special issue of Mineralium Deposita brings together researchers from multiple disciplines to showcase recent advances in understanding the origin and exploration of selected Li-Cs-Ta (LCT) and Sn pegmatite deposits worldwide. The issue comprises ten contributions on topics ranging from mechanisms responsible for the exceptional enrichment of critical metals, through mineralization processes, to mineral exploration.

Mineralium Deposita↗
USGS2026

Insights into Mountain Pass carbonatite formation from in-situ sulfur isotopes and geochemistry of sulfate and sulfide minerals

The Mountain Pass carbonatite stock hosts a world-class rare earth element deposit and may be classified as a carbonate-sulfate igneous rock, as it contains on average > 50 volume percent carbonate minerals and 20 to 30 volume percent sulfate minerals. The sulfates range in composition from barite to celestine and locally occur with sparse sulfide minerals. We investigate the origin of sulfur enrichment and the occurrence of sulfur-bearing minerals in the Mountain Pass carbonatite with in-situ sulfur isotope and mineral chemistry. Barite cores with δ 34 S of 1 to 3‰ do not coexist with sulfides, whereas celestine rims with δ 34 S of > 3‰ are associated with sulfides with δ 34 S < -10‰. We propose a model in which sulfur-bearing sediments were subducted during episodes of plate convergence in the Mojave Province that preceded Mountain Pass magmatism. Metasomatism of the overlying mantle by melts derived from the subducted sediments generated an unusually carbon- and sulfur-rich source to yield carbonatite magmas. Sulfur from primary carbonatite magmas and ~ 1 to 7% sulfur from subducted sediment melts yielded a slightly enriched δ 34 S composition (relative to depleted mantle δ 34 S of -1‰) for early crystallizing barite. Celestine rims on magmatic barite cores formed at low, hydrothermal temperatures (< 350 °C) based on S isotope thermometry for equilibrium celestine-galena and celestine-pyrite pairs. The sparse sulfides in the carbonatite stock are not in equilibrium with the primary barite cores and therefore do not permit S isotope thermometry estimates of magmatic temperatures. The S/Se ratios of sulfide minerals (> 3,400) typically exceed primitive mantle values (S/Se of 3,340), also consistent with their derivation from hydrothermal fluids. Trace occurrences of sulfide and sulfate minerals in alkaline silicate stocks related to the carbonatite stock have similar δ 34 S compositions and yield similarly low formation temperatures, suggesting regionally extensive and chemically similar sulfur-bearing hydrothermal fluids that imparted lithologically diverse rocks with a consistent sulfur isotope fingerprint.

California, Nevada↗