USGS Science⌕ Search

USGS · 70000008

Reflectance spectroscopy for the assessment of soil salt content in soils of the yellow river delta of China

Abstract

There has been growing interest in the use of reflectance spectroscopy as a rapid and inexpensive tool for soil characterization. In this study, we collected 95 soil samples from the Yellow River Delta of China to investigate the level of soil salinity in relation to soil spectra. Sample plots were selected based on a field investigation and the corresponding soil salinity classification map to maximize variations of saline characteristics in the soil. Spectral reflectances of air-dried soil samples were measured using an Analytical Spectral Device (ASD) spectrometer (350-2500 nm) with an artificial light source. In the Yellow River Delta, the dominant chemical in the saline soil was NaCl and MgCl2. Soil spectra were analysed using two-thirds of the available samples, with the remaining one-third withheld for validation purposes. The analysis indicated that with some preprocessing, the reflectance at 1931-2123 nm and 2153-2254 nm was highly correlated with soil salt content (SSC). In the spectral region of 1931-2123 nm, the correlation R ranged from -0.80 to -0.87. In the region of 2153-2254 nm, the SSC was positively correlated with preprocessed reflectance (0.79-0.88). The preprocessing was done by fitting a convex hull to the reflectance curve and dividing the spectral reflectance by the value of the corresponding convex hull band by band. This process is called continuum removal, and the resulting ratio is called continuum removed reflectance (CR reflectance). However, the SSC did not have a high correlation with the unprocessed reflectance, and the correlation was always negative in the entire spectrum (350-2500 nm) with the strongest negative correlation at 1981 nm (R = -0.63). Moreover, we found a strong correlation (R=0.91) between a soil salinity index (SSI: Constructed using CR reflectance at 2052 nm and 2203 nm) and SSC. We estimated SSC as a function of SSI and SSI' (SSI': Constructed using unprocessed reflectance at 2052 nm and 2203 nm) using univariate regression. Validation of the estimation of SSC was conducted by comparing the estimated SSC with the holdout sample points. The comparison produced an estimated root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.986 (SSC ranging from 0.06 to 12.30 g kg-1) and R2 of 0.873 for SSC with SSI as independent variable and RMSE of 1.248 and R2 of 0.8 for SSC with SSI' as independent variable. This study showed that a soil salinity index developed for CR reflectance at 2052 nm and 2203 nm on the basis of spectral absorption features of saline soil can be used as a quick and inexpensive method for soil salt-content estimation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yongling Weng, P. Gong, Z. Zhu. 2008-09-20. Reflectance spectroscopy for the assessment of soil salt content in soils of the yellow river delta of China. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160801930248

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Bridging remote sensing advances and management needs for small Prairie Pothole waterbodies using a multiscale accuracy assessment

Remote sensing of surface water provides a powerful tool to inform the management of waterfowl habitat, but there is little information available to directly assess the relative accuracy of different remote sensing datasets. Our objective was to understand how the characteristics of remotely sensed inundation datasets inform dataset accuracy, the reliable detection of small waterbodies, the distribution of surface water, observation frequency and completeness of data: all attributes relevant to the management of waterfowl habitat. We compared surface water composites from 10 remotely sensed surface water datasets from 2016 to 2021 to in-situ surface water data for three complexes of small waterbodies in the U.S. Prairie Pothole Region and evaluated their accuracy at the pixel, waterbody and local landscape scales. While all products had high per-pixel balanced accuracies (>0.75), we found distinct differences in waterbody area and landscape distribution estimates among datasets. Sentinel-1-based datasets provided a more complete set of observations over time and were more sensitive in detecting water presence in smaller waterbodies but were less accurate at identifying waterbody area than other datasets evaluated. Landsat datasets, alternatively, produced simpler landscape distributions that largely omitted the smallest waterbodies. While the datasets that either fused Sentinel-1 and −2 data collections or utilized local training data had the highest performances (e.g. balanced accuracy = 0.92), all datasets had use-case scenarios for which they may be informative. Our comparisons revealed differences that were not evident in traditional pixel-scale accuracy assessment, such as an 18-fold difference in the number of inundated waterbodies identified across remote sensing datasets. These findings provide novel insights for waterfowl conservation management on howremote sensing datasets may differ in their ability to monitor annual spring surface water presence within landscapes dominated by small waterbodies, such as the Prairie Pothole Region.

Minnesota, North Dakota↗

Sentinel-2 for chlorophyll-a water quality monitoring: A review of validation evidence and application potential

Water quality monitoring is integral to preserving the health of freshwater ecosystems, and satellite remote sensing has emerged as one monitoring method. Sentinel-2, in particular, has been valuable for water quality monitoring due to its 5-day global temporal revisit time and spatial resolution that ranges from 10 to 60 metres. Sentinel-2 can be used to measure and monitor chlorophyll-a, which historically has been used as an indicator of water quality, eutrophication and harmful algal blooms. Our goal was to review aquatic chlorophyll-a Sentinel-2 research to assess the types of validation evidence reported. Validation evidence is defined here as the set of information key to assessing algorithm performance, and include the spatial and temporal scales of satellite validation, reported in situ sampling method context information, demonstration of validation results through plots, and appropriate algorithm performance metrics. We highlight how the body of literature collectively contributes to advancing a national scale chlorophyll-a product that could support future resource management applications. Our review of 122 published studies indicated that much of the validation evidence corresponded to early stages, as defined by the NASA data maturity framework, due to a limited focus on individual lakes and limited detail on methodology for reproducibility. Prioritizing data accessibility for both in situ data and satellite workflows used in published studies; reporting methods with transparency and consistency; and using standard algorithm performance metrics could provide a consistent framework to support and enhance the utility of satellite inland water quality research. These three quality assurance mechanisms can promote effective evaluation of approaches for remote sensing of chlorophyll-a. Adopting these quality criteria could enable the integration of validation evidence from multiple studies, supporting more spatially and temporally representative products that would advance these approaches towards maturation for broader application.

International Journal of Remote Sensing↗

Deep learning approaches on Landsat observations: A review and meta-analysis

Although multiple summary reviews of deep learning in remote sensing have been conducted, the field currently lacks a comprehensive analysis of deep learning utilizing Landsat observations in single time pixel-based classification, both qualitatively and quantitatively. This study addresses this gap by conducting a systematic review based on 352 case studies extracted from 279 peer-reviewed articles that supported direct comparisons across deep learning and traditional classifiers. Qualitatively, our findings are as follows: (i) Two dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) remain the dominant methods; however, exploring other architectures is becoming a growing trend. (ii) Most studies focused on single countries (e.g., China, USA, and India) and the last decade, (iii) Sentinel-2 are the most commonly fused sensors, and vegetation indices are the most commonly used spectral indices. The quantitative meta-analysis revealed that Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) offer an approximate 5% improvement for non-DNN accuracy of 80%, with potentially higher improvements for more challenging tasks. By contrasting between popular DNN methods, UNets achieve higher overall accuracy (OA) than CNNs (approximately 10% UNet improvement when CNN OA is at 80%). However, UNets are more challenging to implement because they require labels for large contiguous reference patches, while CNNs, at least at 30m Landsat pixel, pose lower spatial requirements. In another comparison, Transformers achieve higher OA than CNNs (approximately 5% Transformer improvement when CNN OA is at 80%), although the accuracy improvements are smaller compared to the increases associated with UNet benefits. With greater flexibility and more standardized architecture, Transformers can potentially simplify the design process of models. However, Transformers also face challenges having higher computational resource and memory requirements. Increasing availability of reference datasets, further algorithmic developments in the machine learning field, and improvements in cloud-based computing power and data storage, could increase the utility of deep learning methods on Landsat observations.

International Journal of Remote Sensing↗