Habitat-based adaptive management at Mount Haggin Wildlife Management Area

R.B. Keigley; C.W. Fager

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 1008640

Habitat-based adaptive management at Mount Haggin Wildlife Management Area

R.B. Keigley·C.W. Fager

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The 22,743-hectare Mount Haggin Wildlife Management Area was purchased in 1976, in part for moose (Alces alces) winter range. Observed moose populations climbed from a low of 7 in 1976 to a high of 56 in 2000. A 4-step management program was initiated in 2000 consisting of definition of management objective, monitoring to determine if the objective was attained, developing a management strategy, and implementing the strategy. The management objective for browse was defined to be: browsing will not preventyoung plants from attaining their potential stature, their growth being primarily limited by local environmental conditions. Asurvey of Geyer willow (Salix geyeriana) in critical moose habitat indicated that browse plants were 100% intensely browsed, suggesting that browsing could prevent willowheightgrowth. Beginning in 2000, willow trend was monitored annually at 4 sites using an index based on the height of the tallest live stem and the height of the tallest, dead intensely browsed stem (LD Index). Low LD Index values indicated that browsing did prevent height growth. In 2000 moose harvest quotas were increased by 40%; in 2002 harvest quotas were increased an additional 7%. From 2000 to 2002, willow growth increased at all 4 locations. From 2002 to 2004, growth indicators changed relatively little at Sullivan Creek, Deep Creek, and French Creek; at these sites willow condition in 2004 had improved compared to willow condition in 2000. From 2002 to 2004, growth indicators declined markedly at American Creek; in 2004, growth indicators at American Creek were lower compared to measurements made in 2000. The improvement of willow condition at 3 sites was likely due to a combination of reduced moose numbers (due to an increase in harvest) and increased dispersal (due to low snow-cover conditions). Over the study period, the sporting public complained of reduced moose sightability; harvest quotas were lowered substantially in 2003.

Explore related subjects

Alces Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 62.41581641980274° to 64.90491004905083° latitude; -150.194091796875° to -144.77783203125° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

R.B. Keigley, C.W. Fager. 2006. Habitat-based adaptive management at Mount Haggin Wildlife Management Area. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/1008640

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2023

Birth rates and neonate survival in a parasite rich moose population in Vermont, USA

Moose ( Alces alces ) populations are declining across much of their southern geographic range in North America. In Vermont and other northeastern states, measurable declines are attributed to low calf survival and reduced productivity associated with persistent winter tick ( Dermacentor albipictus ) parasitism. In 2017–2020, we studied 75 radio-collared female moose (38 calves and 37 adults) in Vermont to examine physiological, spatial, and temporal parameters relative to calf survival and adult productivity. Physiological measures included concentration of fecal glucocorticoid metabolites (fGCM) which reflects stress, and urea nitrogen:creatinine ratios in urine (UN:C) which proxy nutritional state. The pregnancy rate at capture across years was 0.67 (95% CI = 0.50 – 0.80), and was negatively related to presence of lungworm ( Dictyocaulus spp.). The birth rate calculated as the average number of offspring delivered per adult female was <1.0 overall (2017–2020, LCI = 0.22, UCI = 0.86), similar across years, but increased with age. Logistic exposure models indicated that daily calf survival to 60 d increased as Julian birth date and days since birth increased (log odds = 0.0819, SE = 0.0215). The per capita independence rate, or rate that adult females add independent calves to the population, was negatively related to UN:C ratios and positively with fGCM. Further, this rate was related to autumnal habitat use of adult females; it was greater in home ranges characterized by large amounts of mature (canopy) evergreen forests and wetland habitats, and small amounts of mixed forests and elevation than in ranges with abundant levels of mixed forest at high elevation. We conclude that winter ticks can negatively affect moose fecundity, and efforts to reduce host (moose) density through harvest or parasite (host) abundance through habitat manipulation may improve productivity and recruitment in local moose populations.

Vermont↗

USGS2022

Extending body condition scoring beyond measurable rump fat to estimate full range of nutritional condition for moose

Moose ( Alces alces ) populations along the southern extent of their range are largely declining, and there is growing evidence that nutritional condition — which influences several vital rates – is a contributing factor. Moose body condition can presently be estimated only when there is measurable subcutaneous rump fat, which equates to animals with >6% ingesta-free body fat (IFBFat). There is need for a technique to allow body fat estimation of animals in poorer body condition (i.e., <6% body fat). We advance current methods for moose, following those used and validated with other ungulate species, by establishing a moose-specific body condition score (BCS) that can be used to estimate IFBFat in the lower range of condition. Our modified BCS was related strongly ( r 2 = 0.89) to IFBFat estimates based on measurable rump fat. By extending the predicted relationship to individuals without measurable fat, the BCS equated severe emaciation with 0.67% IFBFat, supporting the accuracy of the method. The lower end of nutritional condition is important for identifying relationships involving life-history characteristics because most state-dependent changes occur at lower levels of condition. Therefore, until the BCS can be validated with moose carcasses, we believe our method to estimate body fat across the full range of condition should yield better understanding of the drivers underlying declining moose populations.

Alces↗

USGS2021

Modeling moose habitat use by age, sex, and season in Vermont, USA using high-resolution lidar and national land cover data

Moose ( Alces alces ) populations have experienced unprecedented declines along the southern periphery of their range, including Vermont, USA. Habitat management may be used to improve the status of the population and health of individuals. To date, however, Vermont wildlife managers have been challenged to effectively use this important tool due to the lack of fine-scale information on moose space use and habitat characteristics. To assess habitat use, we combined more than 40,000 moose locations collected from radio-collared individuals (n = 74), recent land cover data, and high resolution, 3-dimensional lidar ( light detection and ranging ) data to develop Resource Utilization Functions (RUF) by age (mature and young adult), season (dormant and growth), and sex. Each RUF linked home range use to average habitat conditions within 400 m or 1 km of each 30 m 2 pixel within the home range. Across analyses, the top RUF models included both composition (as measured through the National Land Cover Database) and structure (as measured through lidar) variables, and significantly outperformed models that excluded lidar variables. These findings support the notion that lidar is an effective tool for improving the ability of models to estimate patterns of habitat use, especially for larger bodied mammals. Generally speaking, female moose actively used areas with proportionally more regenerating forest (i.e., forage < 3.0 m) and more mature forest (i.e., canopy structure > 6.0 m), while males actively used more high elevation, mixed forest types. Further, moose exhibited important seasonal differences in habitat use that likely reflect temporal changes in energetic and nutritional requirements and behavior across the year. Moose used areas with proportionally more regenerating forest (i.e., forage < 3.0 m) during the growth period and female moose had strong positive associations with lidar-derived canopy structure during the growth (but not the dormant) period. Ultimately, the resultant maps of habitat use provide a means of informing management activities (e.g., the restoration or alteration of habitats to benefit moose) and policies around land use that may contribute to population recovery.

Vermont↗