Estimating total human-caused mortality from reported mortality using data from radio-instrumented grizzly bears

S. Cherry; M.A. Haroldson; J. Robison-Cox; C.C. Schwartz

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 1008616

Estimating total human-caused mortality from reported mortality using data from radio-instrumented grizzly bears

S. Cherry·M.A. Haroldson·J. Robison-Cox·C.C. Schwartz

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Tracking mortality of the Yellowstone grizzly bear ( Ursus arctos horribilis ) is an essential issue of the recovery process. Problem bears removed by agencies are well documented. Deaths of radiocollared bears are known or, in many cases, can be reliably inferred. Additionally, the public reports an unknown proportion of deaths of uncollared bears. Estimating the number of non-agency human-caused mortalities is a necessary element that must be factored into the total annual mortality. Here, we describe a method of estimating the number of such deaths from records of reported human-caused bear mortalities. We used a hierarchical Bayesian model with a non-informative prior distribution for the number of deaths. Estimates of reporting rates developed from deaths of radio-instrumented bears from 1983 to 2000 were used to develop beta prior probability distributions that the public will report a death. Twenty-seven known deaths of radio-instrumented bears occurred during this period with 16 reported. Additionally, fates of 23 radio-instrumented bears were unknown and are considered possible unreported mortalities. We describe 3 ways of using this information to specify prior distributions on the probability a death will be reported by the public. We estimated total deaths of noninstrumented bears in running 3-year periods from 1993 to 2000. Thirty-nine known deaths of non-instrumented bears were reported during this period, ranging from 0 to 7/year. Seven possible mortalities were recorded. We applied the method to both sets of mortality data. Results from this method can be combined with agency removals and deaths of collared bears to produce defensible estimates of total mortality over relevant periods and to incorporate uncertainty when evaluating mortality limits established for the Yellowstone grizzly bear population. Assumptions and limitations of this procedure are discussed.

Explore related subjects

Ursus Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 43.8186748554532° to 45.02695045318546° latitude; -110.98388671874999° to -109.13818359375° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

S. Cherry, M.A. Haroldson, J. Robison-Cox, C.C. Schwartz. 2002. Estimating total human-caused mortality from reported mortality using data from radio-instrumented grizzly bears. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/1008616

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Detecting occurrence and timing of grizzly bear parturition based on anomalies in accelerometer data

Documenting natality of brown (grizzly) bears ( Ursus arctos ) is an important component of many population monitoring and research programs. Brown bears give birth during hibernation, so observation of litters is generally not feasible until females exit dens, and detection of litters can be compromised by poor observability. Using triaxial accelerometer activity data stored on radiocollars, we developed a technique that predicts births by the presence of brief upsurges in activity likely associated with postnatal maternal behaviors. We developed presence criteria with a training sample of known parturient females ( n = 22) to detect anomalies within time-series of daily motion-counts (i.e., activity readings >0 measured at 10-min intervals) during 25 December–7 March. To test performance, we applied criteria to a blinded sample of activity data obtained from female grizzly bears (captured and collared during 2012–2022) in 4 populations in interior North America ( n = 295). We assigned predicted status and compared assignments to reproductive status at first visual observation. The true positive rate was 91% ( n = 47 females observed with cubs of the year) and the false-positive rate was 17% ( n = 65 females observed with older offspring). Births were predicted for 50% of females with unknown reproductive status ( n = 48), 21% of females observed without offspring ( n = 114), and 10% of subadult females considered too young to reproduce ( n = 21). Dates of predicted births varied from 27 December to 28 February. Our anomaly detection technique was successful at estimating parturition events, and despite some error, indicated that a number of litters were born but not observed, presumably due to mortality in or shortly after den emergence. This technique provides an additional tool for supplementing visual observations for natality estimation and population modeling, provided that potential biases stemming from increased detection rates are considered.

Alaska, British Columbia, Idaho, Montana↗

USGS2025

Denning black bear response to anthropogenic disturbance and implications for cub survival in Florida

Wildlife research and management can be disruptive to wildlife. By advancing our understanding of the impacts of these activities, we can reduce adverse effects, improve decision-making, and enhance the outcomes of research and management. During 2017–2019, we observed the responses of denning female American black bears ( Ursus americanus ) to 3 types of routine research and management activities in Florida, USA: (1) a low-level, nonintrusive human approach near the natal den ( n H 44); (2) a high-level, intrusive human approach involving cub handling ( n H 42); and (3) a prescribed burn within 1 km of the den during the denning season ( n H 11). We measured responses (flight distance, time away, and postdisturbance denning behavior) using Global Positioning System collars programmed to record a location every 2 hours. We observed minimal response from bears to low-level human disturbances. In contrast, all bears fled after high-level human disturbances, with responses ranging from staying nearby throughout the disturbance and quickly returning to cubs, to fleeing several kilometers and abandoning cubs. On average, bears fled approximately 380 m from the den and returned to their cubs 7 hours postdisturbance. After returning, most bears relocated their cubs to a new den site, on average 125 m away. Responses to prescribed fire ranged from no measurable response and no den relocation to den site abandonment with cub mortality. Through generalized linear modeling, we found that adult female time away was positively associated with cub age. We found that annual cub survival was negatively associated with fire exposure in the den and with continued denning at a disturbed den site following high-level disturbance. In areas where bears are easily displaced from dens, these results provide insights that may improve bear research and habitat management decisions.

Florida↗

USGS2023

Enhancements to population monitoring of Yellowstone grizzly bears

In the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, counts of female grizzly bears ( Ursus arctos ) with cubs-of-the-year (females with cubs) from systematic aerial surveys and opportunistic ground sightings are combined with demographic data to derive annual population estimates. We addressed 2 limitations to the monitoring approach. As part of a rule set, a conservative distance of > 30 km currently is used as a threshold to assign sightings to unique females with cubs, resulting in underestimation bias. Using telemetry locations of females with cubs collected during 1997–2019, we created 1,000 data sets for each of 5 levels of simulated number of females with cubs, simulated sightings by selecting among these locations, and evaluated the classification performance of alternative distance criteria (12–30 km). Under all scenarios, 12–16-km criteria maximized classification performance and minimized estimation bias; the 16-km criterion was optimal for current conditions and sampling efforts. Our second objective was to test generalized additive models (GAMs) as a flexible trend analysis technique. We simulated 1,000 time series for each of 10 scenarios (10, 15, and 20% decline over periods of 5, 10, and 15 yrs, plus stability), applied GAMs, and assessed metrics associated with the posterior distribution of the instantaneous rate of change. We detected declines among > 99.6% of replicates under the 15 and 20% decline scenarios and in 84.7–94.7% of replicates under the 10% decline scenario. From decline onset to first detection, periods ranged from 3.7 (20% decline over 5 yrs) to 11.1 (10% decline over 15 yrs), with 3.9–8.8 years mean duration of detection events. The GAM approach allows detection of directional changes in population trend, including early warning metrics, and stabilization after such changes. Retrospective application of the 16-km distance criterion and GAMs resulted in higher population estimates and growth rates than are reported using current methods.

Wyoming↗