Dichlobenil as a herbicide in fish habitats

C.R. Walker

doi:10.2307/4040750

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 1003299

Dichlobenil as a herbicide in fish habitats

C.R. Walker

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Application of 20 to 40 lb/A dichlobenil made prior to emergence accomplished various degrees of control of pondweeds ( Potamogeton diversifolius , P. foliosus , P. pectinatus , P. pusillus ) and a slender naiad ( Najas flexilis ). Coontail ( Ceratophyllum demersum ) was affected only by the higher dosage. Limited control and growth inhibition was achieved on several forms of algae in early spring applications. However, applications made to rooted submersed aquatic plants and filamentous algae ( Cladophora , Pithophora and Chara ) at postemergence stage of development had little herbicidal effect. Dichlobenil was not acutely toxic to fish at herbicidal concentrations. The range of median tolerance limits was 10 to 20 ppmw for pumpkinseed ( Lepomis gibbosus ), bluegill ( L. macrochirus ), redear sunfish ( L. microlophus ), and largemouth bass ( Micropterus salmoides ).

Explore related subjects

Weeds Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 35.97661365357092° to 40.68070682391277° latitude; -95.60011165478124° to -89.50574344142996° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

C.R. Walker. 1964. Dichlobenil as a herbicide in fish habitats. https://doi.org/10.2307/4040750

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS1965

Diuron, fenuron, monuron, neburon, and TCA mixtures as aquatic herbicides in fish habitats

The substituted urea herbicides were rated according to their effectiveness as aquatic herbicides in this order: diuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea], monuron [3-(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea], neburon [1-butyl-3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methlyurea] and TCA(trichloroacetic acid) mixtures with them. They showed greatest potential in controlling certain aquatic plants in pre-emergence and early postemergence applications. However, relatively high concentrations were required to control filamentous algae ( Cladophora , Pithophora and Spirogyra ) , chara ( Chara ) , coontail ( Ceratophyllum ) , naiad ( Najas ) , and pondweeds ( Potamogeton ) for periods of time exceeding three months and up to three years. Granular formulations achieved better distribution of herbicides for control of rooted aquatic plants along the margins of lakes and ponds. Wettable powder and liquid emulsifiable concentrates were superior to granular formulations for the control of algae and emergent or floating aquatic plants. Monuron and fenuron were less toxic to fish than were diuron and neburon. The TCA mixtures were somewhat more toxic than the simple ureas. Some species of fish were more sensitive than others and fingerlings more sensitive than adults of the same species. Fish-food organisms were reduced appreciably in plastic enclosures at herbicidal concentrations.

Weeds↗

USGS1965

Control of alligatorweed in South Carolina with granular silvex

Silvex, [2-(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)propionic acid], impregnated (20% ae) on clay granules, applied at a rate as low as 20 lb/A ae gave excellent control of well-rooted alligatorweed [ Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Grieb] growing in less than 18 inches of water. The 2-ethylhexyl ester of silvex was more effective than the potassium salt. Silvex was not effective on floating-mat alligatorweed or in water over 18 inches deep.

South Carolina↗

USGS1964

Simazine and other s-triazine compounds as aquatic herbicides in fish habitats

This investigation studied simazine (2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)- s -triazine), atrazine (2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino- s -triazine), propazine (2-chloro-4,6-bis(isopropylamino)- s -triazine), and prometone (2-methoxy-4,6-bis(isopropylamino)- s -triazine). Preemergence applications of granular formulations of simazine on attaclay or calcium sulfate of simazine at 1 to 2 ppmw controlled Potamogeton , Najas , Ceratophyllum , Heteranthera and Zannichelli a. Higher rates were required to control filamentous algae ( Cladophora and Pithophora ) and chara ( Chara vulgaris ). Early postemergence applications of wettable powder to submersed aquatics and filamentous algae were often effective. Atrazine gave similar results. Concentrations of 0.5 to 1.0 were effective in controlling Cladophora and Pithophora and three species of Potamogeton in pond applications. Spray applications, generally, were more effective than broadcasting granular atrazine. Propazine and prometone did not control submersed species in concentrations up to 3 ppmw. Simazine had a relatively high margin of safety with respect to acute toxicity to fish. It was less toxic than propazine, prometone or atrazine. Granular forms were less toxic than wettable powder or emulsifiable concentrates. Laboratory tests on bottom organisms gave an acute LD 50 toxic dosage of 28 ppmw. Field observations did not demonstrate a serious reduction in the production of bottom organisms. However, the control of aquatic vegetation brought about ecological changes affecting bottom dwelling and weed clinging organisms. These changes would affect certain fishes with special food habits.

Weeds↗