Diatom (Bacillariophyta) community response to water quality and land use

Paul M. Stewart; Jason T. Butcher; Paul J. Gerovac

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 1000926

Diatom (Bacillariophyta) community response to water quality and land use

Paul M. Stewart·Jason T. Butcher·Paul J. Gerovac

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Aquatic algal communities are sensitive to environmental stresses and are used as indicators of water quality. Diatoms were collected from three streams that drain the Great Marsh at Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. Diatom communities, water chemistry, and land use were measured at each site to test the hypothesis that differences in land use indirectly affect diatom communities, through changes in water quality. Relationships among these variables were examined by correlation, cluster, and detrended correspondence analysis. Several water chemistry variables were correlated to several land-use categories. Diatom species diversity was most variable in disturbed areas with poorer water quality and was correlated with land use and total alkalinity, total hardness, and specific conductance. Sites within each stream were grouped in terms of their diatom assemblage by both cluster and detrended correspondence analysis with but two exceptions in Dunes Creek. Diatom communities in the three streams responded to land use through its effects on water quality. The results of this study demonstrate the use of diatom assemblages as indicators of water quality, which can be linked to land use in a watershed.

Explore related subjects

Natural Areas Journal Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 41.290189955885644° to 41.76926321969369° latitude; -87.5390625° to -86.77001953125° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Paul M. Stewart, Jason T. Butcher, Paul J. Gerovac. 1999. Diatom (Bacillariophyta) community response to water quality and land use. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/1000926

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Conducting feasibility assessments of potential conservation reintroductions: A case study with the imperiled foothill yellow-legged frog, Rana boylii

Conservation translocations are an increasingly common and often necessary component of recovering species that have become extirpated from portions of their range. Understanding and ameliorating potential threats that reduce the likelihood of successful population establishment at recipient sites is a key component of successful translocation planning. We examined multiple potential threats, including pathogens, contaminants, and invasive species, as well as habitat suitability and food resources, to assess the feasibility of reintroducing threatened, stream-obligate foothill yellow-legged frogs, Rana boylii , to Pinnacles National Park. Foothill yellow-legged frogs were extirpated from this protected area more than half a century ago. Although invasive species, disease, contaminants, food resources, and water temperatures are unlikely to inhibit foothill yellow-legged frog population establishment, potential recipient streams at Pinnacles National Park had shorter hydroperiods and much higher canopy cover than reference streams with extant foothill yellow-legged frog populations. Although the exact cause of extirpation of foothill yellow-legged frogs from Pinnacles National Park is unknown, translocations of foothill yellow-legged frogs to the park are more likely to succeed if riparian canopy cover is reduced and stream hydroperiods increased to better match those at nearby populations. Thoroughly understanding the threats to and characteristics of potential recipient sites could improve the likelihood of success of translocation outcomes in natural areas.

California↗

USGS2026

A little-known piñon from the Mogollon Highlands: Natural history of Pinus x fallax in the Prescott National Forest, Arizona, USA

The Mogollon Highlands is an area of rich biodiversity in central Arizona and western New Mexico. The piñon-juniper/chaparral in the Mogollon Highlands is unique from other piñon-juniper woodlands in both taxonomy and structure. The hybridization of the common piñon there, Pinus × fallax (Mogollon Highlands piñon, MHP), is hypothesized to render it more tolerant to heat and aridity than one of the parent plants, Pinus edulis (Colorado piñon). Yet as Climate Water Deficit continues to increase, so does concern for the future of these woodlands and the MHP. Using demographic data on MHP from the last four decades, we evaluate fecundity and mortality patterns in woodlands where MHP is co-dominant with three Juniperus species and numerous perennial shrubs. Our data indicate that MHP stands continue to reproduce and that mortality is low relative to the more northern P. edulis stands. We also present a simple calculation of historical fire rotation in Prescott National Forest woodlands, estimating a fire rotation of two centuries, far shorter than other piñon-juniper associations. We also explore fire patterns since 1985 across the ecoregion; abundant charcoal indicates small patchy fires were common. In spite of widespread fires, most Mogollon Highlands fires have occurred in Pinus ponderosa (ponderosa pine) forests, leaving piñon-juniper/chaparral intact. Together these trends indicate that MHP and associated perennial co-dominants are tolerant of current climates. We suggest that hybrid genetic combinations, the complex perennial understory (e.g., actinorhizal shrubs, rich diversity of nurse microsites), and fire patterns are responsible for this resiliency.

Arizona↗

USGS2022

Restoration for resilience: The role of plant-microbial interactions and seed provenance in ecological restoration

With global efforts to restore grassland ecosystems, researchers and land management practitioners are working to reconstruct habitat that will persist and withstand stresses associated with climate change. Part of these efforts involve movement of plant material potentially adapted to future climate conditions from native habitat or seed production locations to a new restoration site. Restoration practice often follows this plant-centered, top-down approach. However, we suggest that restoration of belowground interactions, namely between plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi or rhizobia, is important for restoring resilient grasslands. In this synthesis we highlight these interactions and offer insight into how their restoration might be included in current grassland restoration practice. Ultimately, restoration of belowground interactions may contribute to grassland habitat that can withstand and respond to future climate uncertainties.

Natural Areas Journal↗