Geology topics

Research about central North America

Source-linked reports with geographic coverage including central North America.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

USGS2021

Migration phenology and patterns of American woodcock in central North America derived using satellite telemetry

American woodcock Scolopax minor (hereafter woodcock) migration ecology is poorly understood, but has implications for population ecology and management, especially related to harvest. To describe woodcock migration patterns and phenology, we captured and equipped 73 woodcock with satellite tracking devices in the Central Management Region (analogous to the Mississippi Flyway) of North America and documented migration paths of 60 individual woodcock and 87 autumn or spring woodcock migrations during 2014–2016. Woodcock migration at the scale of the Central Management Region was more synchronous in spring than in autumn, but unlike most other migratory birds, average duration of autumn migration (31 days) was shorter than duration of spring migration (53 days). This difference in migration duration resulted from woodcock making more close-together migratory stopovers during spring migration, not because woodcock had individual stopovers of longer duration. During autumn migration, the number of days, the number of stopovers, migration end date and net migration displacement were negatively related to initiation date and rate of migration, and the number of stopovers and the net migration displacement were negatively related with migration end date. Spring migration duration, end date, the number of stopovers and net migration displacement were negatively related to migration rate and initiation date was positively related to migration rate, suggesting that woodcock that initiated spring migration later had faster migration rates. Juvenile female woodcock began spring migration later than adult female woodcock. Our results provide a basis for comparing current harvest seasons with presence of migrating woodcock during autumn and provide insight into differential harvest of migratory versus local woodcock on breeding areas.

central North America↗

USGS2021

Preserving soil organic carbon in prairie wetlands of central North America

Wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) in the Great Plains of central North America are numerous, densely distributed, and have highly productive plant and animal communities (Photo 49). When in a natural, unaltered condition, these wetlands store relatively large amounts of organic carbon in their soils (Photo 50). Human alterations, such as extensive drainage and land-use conversion for agriculture (Figure 7), have been linked with the loss of soil organic carbon (SOC) and associated emission of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), as well as impacts to other ecosystem services provided by these wetlands, such as wildlife and waterfowl habitat, plant biodiversity, flood mitigation, groundwater recharge, nutrient removal and retention, and recreation (Gleason et al., 2011). It has been estimated that more than half of the wetlands of the PPR have been lost due to drainage and other disturbances, with losses approaching 90 percent in some areas (Dahl, 2014; Serran et al., 2018). The goal of this case study was to identify land-management strategies that are consistent with maintaining and increasing SOC stocks of PPR wetlands. Two overarching strategies generally are promoted to preserve and enhance SOC stocks of PPR wetlands: avoided drainage and rewetting or restoration. Avoided drainage involves protecting natural, unaltered wetlands from impacts of human actives with the purpose of retaining wetland functions and services such as carbon storage. Rewetting or restoration involves reestablishing natural hydrology and land use with the purpose of enhancing wetland functions and services that were previously lost due to human activities. Avoided drainage provides immediate and long-lasting benefits, while replenishing SOC through rewetting and restoration requires many decades. Both strategies are associated with higher methane (CH 4 ) emissions but lower CO 2 and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions.

Alberta, Iowa, Manitoba, Minnesota, Montana, North↗