USGS ScienceSearch

Geology topics

Research about San Andreas Fault, San Jacinto Fault

Source-linked reports with geographic coverage including San Andreas Fault, San Jacinto Fault.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A maximum rupture model for the southern San Andreas and San Jacinto Faults California, derived from paleoseismic earthquake ages: Observations and limitations

Paleoseismic rupture histories provide spatiotemporal models of earthquake moment release needed to test numerical models and lengthen the instrumental catalog. We develop a model of the fewest and thus largest magnitude earthquakes permitted by paleoseismic data for the last 1,500 years on the southern San Andreas and San Jacinto Faults, California, USA. The largest geometric complexity appears to regulate the system: Only two ruptures break the San Gorgonio Pass region, followed by episodes of ruptures that could bridge the northern San Jacinto Fault and the San Andreas Fault. When tested against independent data on slip per event, the model produces comparable values indicating the end‐member model does not underpredict rupture rates. Rupture of >85% of the fault length in the historic period between 1800 and 1857 and the subsequent quiescence is similar to epochs of activity in the prehistoric model, suggesting that regional clustering of seismicity could be a trait of the system.

California

Extension and contraction within an evolving divergent strike-slip fault complex: The San Andreas and San Jacinto fault zones at their convergence in southern California

A variety of extensional and contractional structures is produced by strike slip faulting. The variety and extent of the structures are directly related to the kind and extent of geometric complexities of the fault zone or system. The area of convergence of the San Andreas fault zone and the much younger San Jacinto fault zone in the eastern Transverse Ranges is exquisitely complex. We propose that the San Jacinto fault zone formed in response to a structural knot in San Gorgonio Pass probably within the past 1.5 Ma. In the area of their convergence we propose that slip is transferred both east and west from the San Jacinto fault zone northward to the San Andreas fault zone over a 60-to 70-km band that extends northwestward from the south end of the San Bernardino basin to the east end of the San Gabriel Mountains. We further propose several structural adjustments as a consequence of onset or acceleration of lateral movement on the San Jacinto fault zone: accelerated uplift of the eastern San Gabriel Mountains, development or accentuation of an arcuate schuppen-like structure in the eastern San Gabriel Mountains, inception of the San Bernardino basin, cessation of deposition in the present-day San Timoteo badlands area, inception of the San Jacinto basin, and an increase in compression and uplift in the San Gorgonio Pass area. We interpret the uplift and compression in San Gorgonio Pass to result from two formerly disparate structural blocks—the eastern San Bernardino and San Jacinto blocks—becoming a relatively coherent block, and the San Gorgonio Pass area constituting a left step between the San Andreas fault zone in the Coachella Valley area and the San Jacinto fault zone in the San Jacinto Valley area. The compression and uplift led to the formation of the San Gorgonio Pass thrust faults and disruption of any through-going San Andreas strands, at least at the surface. In partitioning slip between the San Andreas and San Jacinto fault zones, consideration should be given to the bandwidth over which horizontal strain has accumulated. The average slip rate of the northern part of the San Jacinto fault zone during the past 1.5 m.y. may have been about 20 mm/yr and about 15 mm/yr on the San Andreas. South of the San Bernardino basin, current strain accumulation based on repeated geodetic surveys is nearly equally divided between the San Jacinto and San Andreas fault zones.

California