Reevaluating the depositional model of the Cenomanian–Turonian Bridge Creek Limestone Member near Pueblo, Colorado, U.S.A.: Roles of changing sedimentation rate on the formation of limestone–marl bedding couplets
Although interbedded limestone–marl couplets in many hemipelagic and pelagic deposits have been commonly attributed to orbital-driven climate cycles, the driving mechanisms of these couplets remain largely controversial. This situation arises from the fact that detailed sedimentologic and petrographic facies characteristics of these fine-grained deposits have rarely been examined closely. In this study we conduct an integrated sedimentologic and petrographic analysis to disentangle causes of the limestone–marl bedding couplets in the Cenomanian–Turonian Bridge Creek Limestone Member (BCL) of the Greenhorn Formation using cores and outcrop near Pueblo, Colorado. By integrating existing geochemical datasets, each of the three general lithologies in the BCL including limestone, marl, and calcareous mudstone can be divided into two facies, a more bioturbated vs. a more laminated facies, in addition to bentonite beds. The variability in sedimentary, bioturbation, and petrographic characteristics of different sedimentary facies types, as well as constraints from the existing orbital time scale, in the BCL indicate changes in sediment accumulation rate or the amount of time recorded by different facies—the limestone, marl, and calcareous facies are interpreted to reflect increasing sedimentation rate. The sedimentary and petrographic facies variations, including but not limited to lithological alternations, in the BCL are interpreted to result from the combined influence of various processes such as bottom currents, bioturbation, early diagenesis, and episodic volcanic input, with some of the above-mentioned processes likely modulated by short-term relative changes in sea level. Results of this study highlight the need for detailed sedimentologic and petrographic studies and consideration of short-term changes in sedimentation rate to fully resolve the causes of the apparent limestone–marl bedding couplets and reliably reconstruct short-term changes in depositional and environmental conditions from the BCL and other similar successions.