USGS ScienceSearch

Geology topics

Research about Gila County, Pinal County, Arizona

Source-linked reports with geographic coverage including Gila County, Pinal County, Arizona.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Arizona hedgehog cactus (Echinocereus triglochidiatus var. arizonicus)—A systematic data assessment in support of recovery

The Arizona hedgehog cactus ( Echinocereus triglochidiatus var . arizonicus ) is endemic to central Arizona in Gila and Pinal Counties, and has been federally listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) since 1979. Mining, mineral exploration, and highway development have resulted in habitat degradation and loss of individual plants. Therefore, decreases in the population of the cactus are expected to continue. In response to a request from FWS to compile, evaluate, and synthesize data for the cactus, we identified and evaluated existing survey and monitoring data for the cactus and conducted a demographic analysis with suitable data. Systematic surveys for the Arizona hedgehog cactus did not begin until the late 1970s. Early surveys generally were anecdotal descriptions of cactus populations and precisely georeferenced records of individual cactus occurrence did not occur until global positioning systems were widely used. Much of the georeferenced data have been collected by consultants for mining operations, the Arizona Department of Transportation, the U.S. Forest Service, and independent surveyors. Occurrence records have been compiled by the Arizona Game and Fish Department Heritage Data Management System, but submission of these data may be incomplete, and the attributes reported have varied among the contributing entities. The compilation and management of survey data is essential for field-based evidence of the size, distribution, and range extent of the cactus. In support of consistency in future survey data collection, this report makes several suggestions for future surveys. Monitoring for the Arizona hedgehog cactus, defined as repeat observations of the status of cactus individuals, has been done by consulting companies for three mines. Demographic monitoring further involves marking individual cacti in consistently defined plots and recording the fate of each cacti through time, including birth, growth, reproduction, and death. We were able to use demographic monitoring data provided by two consulting companies to calculate survival and population growth rates, using several statistical approaches. Resulting models indicate that larger cacti, as measured by their number of stems, have greater survival rates. Larger individuals also had higher probability of producing more flowers. Small cacti had the lowest survivorship, with potentially only 15–20 percent reaching large size. Most populations monitored by the two companies were stable to increasing. However, there were differences in the growth rates among plots and some plots had negative population growth rates. The demographic monitoring data we used represented relatively dense populations of undisturbed cacti. Hence, overall positive population growth rates were not influenced by any large-scale disturbances. Previous analyses with cacti and other species suggest that more than 10 years of data are necessary to accurately forecast long-term population trajectories. As the monitoring intervals we evaluated were shorter, they represent short-term dynamics only. Several suggestions are made in the report to improve collection of monitoring data to support evidence-based estimates of demographic characteristics of the Arizona hedgehog cactus.

Arizona

Zeolitization of Tertiary tuffs in lacustrine and alluvial deposits in the Ray-San Manuel area, Final and Gila Counties, Arizona

Specimens of tuff in the Ray-San Manuel area, southeastern Arizona, have been X-rayed to determine the present approximate mineralogic composition and the type and degree of alteration of the tuffs. Some of the tuffs consist largely of glass or have been partly or completely altered to calcium montmorillonite; many of them have been almost completely zeolitized or contain a zeolite and some clay. Only three zeolitized specimens contain a little glass. With four exceptions, the zeolitie is clinoptilolite; the exceptions are one altered to chabazite, one to mordenite, one to erionite, and one to erionite, clinoptilolite, and chabazite. The tuffs are mostly of airfall origin and of rhyolitic or probable rhyolitic composition and generally contain negligible percentages of crystal and lithic fragments. Two specimens are tuffaceous sedimentary rocks, and two are ash-flow tuffs. The tuffs range in age from early Pliocene or late Miocene to Oligocene. Some were deposited in lacustrine or playa environments; others were deposited in freshwater alluvial environments. All the beds examined in the lower Miocene and older formations have been zeolitized. Zeolitization of beds in younger formations depends on the environment of deposition. Zeolitized tuffs that contain at least 80 percent zeolite and are in beds more than one-third meter thick are considered potentially minable.

Arizona

Generalized geology and structure of the Winkelman 15-minute quadrangle and vicinity, Pinal and Gila Counties, Arizona

A. northwest-trending belt of steeply east-dipping Precambrian and Paleozoic sedimentary rocks extends across the Winkelman 15-minute quadrangle and separates areas of contrasting structures. To the southwest for 60 mi is an expanse of Precambrian basement, largely granite; to the northeast the Precambrian and Paleozoic sedimentary rocks are gently tilted and intricately faulted. The structure within the Winkelman 15-minute quadrangle is interpreted as a monocline separated into en echelon segments by strike-slip and normal faults. Other monoclines lie-to the north and northwest. Most of the tilting that formed the monoclines occurred after deposition of the early(?) Miocene San Manuel Formation. Structural features that repeat the Precambrian and Paleozoic sedimentary rocks within the area and that resemble high-angle faults are believed to have formed as low-angle thrusts, tilted to their present nearly vertical position during development of the monoclines. Structural features that are younger than the monoclines include low-angle gravity slide surfaces which are older than the high-angle normal faults that formed the basin-and-range topography on which the Pliocene sediments were deposited.

Arizona