USGS ScienceSearch

Geology topics

W. E. Pine

Publications and source records attributed to W. E. Pine.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Restoration is a partial but not complete solution for long-term declines in oyster populations—A case history from the northeastern Gulf of America

Objective We sought to evaluate whether oyster reef restoration is associated with sustained increases in intertidal eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica density in Suwannee Sound, Florida, and to examine how commercial fishing activity and freshwater discharge may modify those patterns. Methods We monitored intertidal oyster reefs for 14 years, including 9 years prior to large-scale restoration (completed in 2018) and 5 years of standardized postrestoration monitoring beginning in 2019 at Lone Cabbage Reef, an offshore intertidal reef complex that was rebuilt to target elevation using dolomite limestone. A Bayesian negative-binomial generalized linear mixed model framework estimated oyster densities while accounting for spatial differences among inshore, nearshore, and offshore reefs; variation in transect length; and temporal variability. We assessed restoration effectiveness via repeated-measures monitoring of fixed restored sites and landscape-scale comparisons of restored versus unrestored reefs. We evaluated covariates of management interest—commercial fishing activity and river discharge—using model comparison and posterior predictions of oyster density at observed covariate values. Results Restoration produced large per-area gains in live-oyster density on offshore reefs. At four fixed restored offshore stations, mean densities rose from near 0 to 91 oysters/m 2 (95% credible interval [CrI] = 43–185) within 6 months and reached 244 oysters/m 2 (95% CrI = 134–433) by year 5 at fixed restoration stations. At the broader landscape scale, restored offshore reefs averaged about 83 oysters/m 2 (95% CrI = 26–157) across sites and postrestoration periods, whereas model-based estimates for restored offshore reefs reached 218 oysters/m 2 (95% CrI = 128–366) in the final sampling period. Conclusions Restoring reef substrate rebuilt the physical capacity for oysters to persist and grow at Lone Cabbage Reef, yielding sustained density gains that degraded sites did not achieve on their own. Harvest status and river discharge showed weak, inconsistent associations once restoration was included, consistent with the interpretation that oyster cultch provides structural capacity, while environmental and fishing conditions modulate around it. Rebuilding and conserving oyster cultch constitute the essential first step to repair and sustain degraded oyster reefs; fishing regulations or favorable environmental conditions alone are unlikely to replace the need for reef structure.

Florida

Resilience management for conservation of inland recreational fisheries

Resilience thinking has generated much interest among scientific communities, yet most resilience concepts have not materialized into management applications. We believe that using resilience concepts to characterize systems and the social and ecological processes affecting them is a way to integrate resilience into better management decisions. This situation is exemplified by inland recreational fisheries, which represent complex socioecological systems that face unpredictable and unavoidable change. Making management decisions in the context of resilience is increasingly important given mounting environmental and anthropogenic perturbations to inland systems. Herein, we propose a framework that allows resilience concepts to be better incorporated into management by (i) recognizing how current constraints and management objectives focus on desired or undesired systems (specific fish and anglers), (ii) evaluating the state of a system in terms of how both social and ecological forces enforce or erode the desired or undesired system, (iii) identifying the resilience-stage cycles a system state may undergo, and (iv) determining the broad management strategies that may be viable given the system state and resilience stage. We use examples from inland recreational fisheries to illustrate different system state and resilience stages and synthesize several key results. Across all combinations of socioecological forces, five common types of viable management strategies emerge: (i) adopt a different management preference or focus, (ii) change stakeholder attitudes or behaviors via stakeholder outreach, (iii) engage in (sometimes extreme) biological intervention, (iv) engage in fishery intervention, and (v) adopt landscape-level management approaches focusing on achieving different systems in different waters. We then discuss the challenges and weaknesses of our approach, including specifically the cases in which there are multiple strong social forces (i.e., stakeholders holding competing objectives or values) and situations where waters are not readily divisible, such as rivers or great lakes, and in which spatial separation of competing objectives will be difficult. We end with our vision of how we believe these types of operationalized resilience approaches could improve or transform inland recreational fisheries management.

Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution