Geology topics

Tatiana Loboda

Publications and source records attributed to Tatiana Loboda.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

USGS2024

A global view of remote sensing of rangelands: Evolution, applications, future pathways

The application of digital remote sensing to rangelands is as long as the history of digital remote sensing itself. Before the launch of the Earth Resources Technology Satellite (ERTS) – later renamed Landsat, scientists were evaluating the use of multispectral aerial imagery to map soils and range vegetation (Yost and Wenderoth 1969). During the late 1960’s, the promise of ERTS, designed to drastically improve our ability to update maps and study earth resources, particularly in developing countries, was eagerly anticipated by a number of government agencies (Carter 1969). With the ERTS launch on July 23, 1972, a flurry of research activity aimed at the application of this new data source to map earth resources began. Practitioners who pioneered the use of satellite based digital remote sensing found the new data source a significant value for rangeland assessments (e.g., Rouse et al., 1973, Rouse et al., 1974, Bauer 1976). This early work established many of the basic techniques still in use today to assess and monitor global rangelands. The following sub-sections discuss the evolution of remote sensing data, methods, and approaches in various decades.

Book chapter↗

USGS2016

Static and dynamic controls on fire activity at moderate spatial and temporal scales in the Alaskan boreal forest

Wildfire, a dominant disturbance in boreal forests, is highly variable in occurrence and behavior at multiple spatiotemporal scales. New data sets provide more detailed spatial and temporal observations of active fires and the post-burn environment in Alaska. In this study, we employ some of these new data to analyze variations in fire activity by developing three explanatory models to examine the occurrence of (1) seasonal periods of elevated fire activity using the number of MODIS active fire detections data set (MCD14DL) within an 11-day moving window, (2) unburned patches within a burned area using the Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity fire severity product, and (3) short-to-moderate interval (<60 yr) fires using areas of burned area overlap in the Alaska Large Fire Database. Explanatory variables for these three models included dynamic variables that can change over the course of the fire season, such as weather and burn date, as well as static variables that remain constant over a fire season, such as topography, drainage, vegetation cover, and fire history. We found that seasonal periods of high fire activity are associated with both seasonal timing and aggregated weather conditions, as well as the landscape composition of areas that are burning. Important static inputs to the model of seasonal fire activity indicate that when fire weather conditions are suitable, areas that typically resist fire (e.g., deciduous stands) may become more vulnerable to burning and therefore less effective as fire breaks. The occurrence of short-to-moderate interval fires appears to be primarily driven by weather conditions, as these were the only relevant explanatory variables in the model. The unique importance of weather in explaining short-to-moderate interval fires implies that fire return intervals (FRIs) will be sensitive to projected climate changes in the region. Unburned patches occur most often in younger stands, which may be related to a greater deciduous fraction of vegetation as well as lower fuel loads compared with mature stands. The fraction of unburned patches may therefore increase in response to decreasing FRIs and increased deciduousness in the region, or these may decrease if fire weather conditions become more severe.

Alaska↗

USGS2015

Global view of remote sensing of rangelands: Evolution, applications, future pathways

The term “rangeland” is rather nebulous, and there is no single definition of rangeland that is universally accepted by land managers, scientists, or international bodies (Lund, 2007; Reeves and Mitchell, 2011). Dozens and possibly hundreds (Lund, 2007) of definitions and ideologies exist because various stakeholders often have unique objectives requiring different information. For the purpose of describing the role of remote sensing in a global context, it is, however, necessary to provide definitions to orient the reader. The Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) of the United Nations convened a conference in 2002 and again in 2013 to begin addressing the issue of harmonizing definitions of forest- related activities. Based on this concept, here rangelands are considered lands usually dominated by nonforest vegetation. The Society for Range Management defines rangelands as (SRM, 1998) Land on which the indigenous vegetation (climax or natural potential) is predominantly grasses, grass-like plants, forbs, or shrubs and is managed as a natural ecosystem. If plants are introduced, they are managed similarly. Rangelands include natural grasslands, savannas, shrublands, many deserts, tundra, alpine communities, marshes, and wet meadows.

Book chapter↗