USGS Science⌕ Search

Geology topics

Samantha T. Arundel

Publications and source records attributed to Samantha T. Arundel.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
USGS2026

Authoritative knowledge infrastructure for GeoAI: Implications for scientific spatial data providers

Geospatial Artificial Intelligence (GeoAI) increasingly relies on automated analysis of authoritative geospatial data, exposing limitations in data infrastructures originally designed for simple dissemination rather than for knowledge-driven use. From the perspective of scientific spatial data providers, the challenge is enabling GeoAI responsibly while retaining semantic clarity, provenance, reproducibility, and governance. This short paper (i) examines how GeoAI exposed limitations within existing geospatial data infrastructures, and (ii) identifies provider-side requirements for an authoritative knowledge infrastructure. Drawing on GIScience, scientific workflow, and operational AI literature, the paper outlines implications for national mapping organizations that seek to support advanced analytics without jeopardizing scientific rigor or stewardship responsibilities.

Conference Paper↗
USGS2026

Geospatial Agentic Services: A framework for interoperable geospatial intelligence

Autonomous GIS uses large language models as its reasoning core to automate spatial data collection, analysis, modeling, and visualization for solving spatial problems with minimal human intervention. Often implemented through autonomous geospatial agents that work independently or collaboratively, it represents a shift from GIS as a passive software environment requiring expert operation towards systems capable of task-oriented interaction, workflow generation and increasingly autonomous spatial analysis and decision support. However, current GIS agents are often isolated and tightly coupled with specific platforms, tools, or applications, which limits their reuse and interoperability across systems and domains. In this paper, we introduce Geospatial Agentic Services, or GAS, as a service-oriented framework for publishing, discovering, invoking, and composing GIS agents as interoperable geospatial services. GAS extends traditional geospatial interoperability beyond access to data and predefined operations towards geospatial intelligence interoperability, where GIS agents function as discoverable, reusable, and collaborative service entities that encapsulate spatial knowledge and reasoning. Building on service-oriented architecture, GAS supports structured geospatial skill declarations, agentic service registry and discovery, and distributed agent orchestration. It also integrates validation, provenance, reproducibility, and governance to support transparent and trustworthy geospatial analyses. To demonstrate the framework, we present a GAS implementation and illustrate its use through common invocation modes and representative AI-orchestrated workflows. By connecting traditional geospatial service architecture with emerging agentic interoperability, GAS provides a conceptual and architectural foundation for interoperable, reusable, and scalable agentic geospatial services and workflows in the era of autonomous GIS.

Annals of GIS↗
USGS2026

Improving building footprint extraction using NAIP and 3DEP lidar derived features with deep learning

Accurate building footprint extraction is critical for applications ranging from population estimation to disaster management. Although optical imagery provides detailed spectral information, it often struggles with shadows, occlusions, and background clutter in dense urban environments. Lidar data, by contrast, offer precise elevation and structural attributes but face challenges such as variable point density and noise. This study integrates multispectral imagery from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) with lidar-derived feature height and intensity from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) to improve footprint extraction using a U-Net–based deep learning model. A six-band input stack (RGB, near-infrared, height, intensity) was developed, normalized, and tiled for training and evaluation against Microsoft Global Building Footprints (GBF). Results from the Houston, TX test site show that the six-band model achieved a precision of 0.86, recall of 0.88, F1 score of 0.87, and Intersection-over-Union (IoU) of 0.76, consistently outperforming four-band baselines by reducing false positives while maintaining sensitivity. Predictions on withheld Houston tiles confirmed strong within-region generalization, yielded a precision of 0.78, recall of 0.81, F1 score of 0.79, and IoU of 0.66. Qualitative analysis further revealed limitations stemming from both training label quality and vegetation–building confusion. These findings demonstrate the complementary value of integrating spectral and structural information for robust building footprint extraction and how domain adaptation strategies can be used to enhance cross-regional transferability.

Texas↗
USGS2026

Structure-aware unsupervised transmission corridor structure extraction from 3DEP lidar using graph attention embeddings and reinforcement-learned DBSCAN

Transmission corridors are critical components of power delivery infrastructure, and their large-area monitoring increasingly relies on national-scale airborne lidar programs. This study presents an unsupervised, scalable framework for extracting transmission corridor structures (including conductors and supporting towers) from U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) lidar point clouds. The workflow begins with height-above-ground filtering and statistical outlier removal to isolate elevated infrastructure candidates. Local Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is then used to compute fine-scale geometric descriptors. To incorporate spatial context and improve structural separability in feature space, we learn point embeddings using a Graph Attention Network (GAT) trained with a structure-consistency triplet objective, yielding representations tailored for downstream density-based grouping rather than semantic classification. To address the spatial non-stationarity of point density and noise across large scenes, we formulate Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) parameter selection as a reinforcement learning problem and employ Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) to adapt 𝜀 and minPts at the block level based on embedding statistics. The final extraction is produced via block-wise DBSCAN and spatial merging to support efficient processing of multi-million-point clouds. Experiments on USGS 3DEP data over Houston, Texas, show that the proposed method produces spatially coherent candidate corridor structures from unstructured lidar. Quantitative assessment is conducted using OpenStreetMap (OSM)-referenced spatial-agreement metrics under a consistent vector-reference protocol, alongside comparative baselines and ablation studies, to examine the relative contributions of graph embedding learning and RL-based adaptive clustering.

Texas↗
USGS2026

Evaluating U.S. Geological Survey 3D Elevation Program LiDAR data as a source for building height

Accurate building height information is used for numerous urban applications, including infrastructure modeling, disaster risk assessment, and energy demand estimation. The U.S. Geological Survey collects airborne lidar data to support the three-dimensional elevation program (3DEP). The high point density and vertical accuracy of the lidar point clouds are optimal for 3D mapping. Few studies have systematically evaluated building height extraction from 3DEP lidar point clouds in urban areas. This study assesses the accuracy and consistency of building height estimates from two publicly available data sets by comparing them to the 3DEP lidar data. The public building height data sets are USA Structures and Microsoft Global Building Footprints (GBF), and they are evaluated across two contrasting urban sites. Building heights from USA Structures are also lidar-derived, whereas GBF estimates are based on stereo matching of optical imagery. Building heights from 3DEP were extracted by classifying lidar points using a deep learning model, isolating roof and ground returns, and computing the height as the median elevation difference between the roof and surrounding ground points. For both sites, 3DEP lidar-derived heights show strong agreement with USA Structures (R 2 = 0.87 and 0.86; MAE = 1.8 and 2.2 m), confirming the internal consistency and reliability of lidar-derived measurements. In contrast, comparisons with GBF height estimates reveal significantly lower correlations (R 2 = 0.54 and 0.60; MAE = 2.5 and 3.1 m), highlighting the limitations of imagery-based height reconstruction, particularly in dense or heterogeneous urban environments. These findings indicate that lidar can be used as an accurate source for vertical structure characterization and underscore the benefits of improved integration and bias correction when using imagery-derived building heights. The results provide support for hybrid approaches that combine the broad spatial coverage of optical data sets with the accuracy of lidar for scalable 3D urban mapping.

Colorado, Texas↗
USGS2025

GIScience in the era of Artificial Intelligence: A research agenda towards Autonomous GIS

The advent of generative AI exemplified by large language models (LLMs) opens new ways to represent and compute geographic information and transcends the process of geographic knowledge production, driving geographic information systems (GIS) towards autonomous GIS. Leveraging LLMs as the decision core, autonomous GIS can independently generate and execute geoprocessing workflows to perform spatial analysis. In this vision paper, we further elaborate on the concept of autonomous GIS and present a conceptual framework that defines its five autonomous goals, five levels of autonomy, five core functions, and three operational scales. We demonstrate how autonomous GIS could perform geospatial data retrieval, spatial analysis, and map making with four proof-of-concept GIS agents. We conclude by identifying critical challenges and future research directions, including fine-tuning and self-growing decision-cores, autonomous modelling, and examining the societal and practical implications of autonomous GIS. By establishing the groundwork for a paradigm shift in GIScience, this paper envisions a future where GIS moves beyond traditional workflows to autonomously reason, derive, innovate, and advance geospatial solutions to pressing global challenges. Meanwhile, we emphasize that as we design and deploy increasingly intelligent geospatial systems, we carry a responsibility to ensure they are developed in socially responsible ways, serve the public good, and support the continued value of human geographic insight in an AI-augmented future.

Annals of GIS↗
USGS2025

Harnessing geospatial artificial intelligence and deep learning for landslide inventory mapping: Advances, challenges, and emerging directions

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning enable more accurate, scalable, and automated mapping. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the applications of AI, particularly deep learning, in landslide inventory mapping. In addition to examining commonly used data sources and model architectures, we explore innovative strategies such as feature enhancement and fusion, attention-boosted techniques, and advanced learning approaches, including active learning and transfer learning, to enhance model adaptability and predictability. We also highlight the remaining challenges and potential research directions, including the estimation of more diverse variables in landslide mapping, multimodal data alignment, modeling regional variability and replicability, as well as issues related to data misinterpretation and model explainability. This review aims to serve as a useful resource for researchers and practitioners, promoting the integration of deep learning into landslide research and disaster management.

Remote Sensing↗
USGS2024

GeoAI for science and the science of GeoAI

This paper reviews trends in GeoAI research and discusses cutting-edge ad- vances in GeoAI and its roles in accelerating environmental and social sciences. It ad- dresses ongoing attempts to improve the predictability of GeoAI models and recent re- search aimed at increasing model explainability and reproducibility to ensure trustworthy geospatial findings. The paper also provides reflections on the importance of defining the "science" of GeoAI in terms of its fundamental principles, theories, and methods to ensure scientific rigor, social responsibility, and lasting impacts.

Journal of Spatial Information Science↗
USGS2024

Evaluation of classified ground points from National Agriculture Imagery program photogrammetrically derived point clouds

Studies have shown that digital surface models and point clouds generated by the United States Department of Agriculture’s National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) can measure basic forest parameters such as canopy height. However, all measured forest parameters from these studies are evaluated using the differences between NAIP digital surface models (DSMs) and available lidar digital terrain models (DTMs). A survey of NAIP point cloud classification and related ground point-generated DTMs has not yet been undertaken. This study applies a Support Vector Machine (SVM) to classifying ground and nonground points from NAIP point clouds for test sites in Wyoming and Arizona, USA. Light detection and ranging (lidar) data from the U.S. Geological Survey 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) are used to validate the classified NAIP ground points and their corresponding DTMs. Comparing height differences between filtered NAIP ground points and 3DEP ground points, the SVM classifier’s results show that the vertical root mean square error value is 1.87 m and 1.69 m for the Wyoming and Arizona sites, respectively. If NAIP point clouds were continuously measured, the resulting availability of medium-resolution DTMs would benefit the application of multitemporal forest health monitoring and DTM generation.

Remote Sensing Letters↗
USGS2024

Segment anything model can not segment anything: Assessing AI foundation model's generalizability in permafrost mapping

This paper assesses trending AI foundation models, especially emerging computer vision foundation models and their performance in natural landscape feature segmentation. While the term foundation model has quickly garnered interest from the geospatial domain, its definition remains vague. Hence, this paper will first introduce AI foundation models and their defining characteristics. Built upon the tremendous success achieved by Large Language Models (LLMs) as the foundation models for language tasks, this paper discusses the challenges of building foundation models for geospatial artificial intelligence (GeoAI) vision tasks. To evaluate the performance of large AI vision models, especially Meta’s Segment Anything Model (SAM), we implemented different instance segmentation pipelines that minimize the changes to SAM to leverage its power as a foundation model. A series of prompt strategies were developed to test SAM’s performance regarding its theoretical upper bound of predictive accuracy, zero-shot performance, and domain adaptability through fine-tuning. The analysis used two permafrost feature datasets, ice-wedge polygons and retrogressive thaw slumps because (1) these landform features are more challenging to segment than man-made features due to their complicated formation mechanisms, diverse forms, and vague boundaries; (2) their presence and changes are important indicators for Arctic warming and climate change. The results show that although promising, SAM still has room for improvement to support AI-augmented terrain mapping. The spatial and domain generalizability of this finding is further validated using a more general dataset EuroCrops for agricultural field mapping. Finally, we discuss future research directions that strengthen SAM’s applicability in challenging geospatial domains.

Remote Sensing↗
USGS2024

Assessing the utility of uncrewed aerial system photogrammetrically derived point clouds for land cover classification in the Alaska North Slope

Uncrewed aerial systems (UASs) have been used to collect “pseudo field plot” data in the form of large-scale stereo imagery to supplement and bolster direct field observations to monitor areas in Alaska. These data supplement field data that is difficult to collect in such a vast landscape with a relatively short field season. Dense photogrammetrically derived point clouds are created and are facilitated to extract land cover data using a support vector machine (SVM) classifier in this study. We test our approach using point clouds derived from 1-cm stereo imagery of plots in the Alaska North Slope region and compare the results to field observations. The results show that the overall accuracy of six land cover classes (bare soil, shrub, grass, forb/herb, rock, and litter) is 96.8% from classified patches. Shrub had the highest accuracy (>99%) and forb/herb achieved the lowest (<48%). This study reveals that the approach could be used as reference data to check field observations in remote areas.

Alaska↗
USGS2023

Reimagining standardization and geospatial interoperability in today’s GeoAI culture

Integrating Geospatial Artificial Intelligence (GeoAI) into our technological landscape has revolutionized our capacity to understand and engage with the world. However, the burgeoning adoption of GeoAI applications has underscored the imperative of data, format, and conveyance standardization and enhancing geospatial interoperability. This vision paper delves into the intricacies of the evolving GeoAI environment, emphasizing the indispensable role of standardized practices and elevated interoperability. By synthesizing insights from geography, computer science, and data ethics, this contribution envisions a future characterized by seamless synergy between AI systems and geospatial data, driving impactful decision-making and transformative innovation.

Conference Paper↗
USGS2023

Assessment of a new GeoAI foundation model for floodinundation mapping

Vision foundation models are a new frontier in GeoAI research because of their potential to enable powerful image analysis by analyzing and extracting important image features from vast amounts of geospatial data. This paper evaluates the performance of the first-of-its-kind geospatial foundation model, IBM-NASA’s Prithvi, to support a crucial geospatial analysis task: flood inundation mapping. This model is compared with popular convolutional neural networks and vision transformer-based architectures regarding mapping accuracy for flooded areas. A benchmark dataset, Sen1Floods11, is used in the experiments, and the models' predictability, generalizability, and transferability are evaluated based on both validation datasets and datasets completely unseen by the model. Results show the impressive transferability of the Prithvi model, highlighting its performance advantages in segmenting flooded areas in previously unseen regions. The findings also suggest areas for improvement for the Prithvi model in adopting multi-scale representation learning, developing more end-to-end pipelines for high-level image analysis tasks, and offering more flexibility in allowable input data bands.

Conference Paper↗
USGS2023

A guide to creating an effective big data management framework

Many agencies and organizations, such as the U.S. Geological Survey, handle massive geospatial datasets and their auxiliary data and are thus faced with challenges in storing data and ingesting it, transferring it between internal programs, and egressing it to external entities. As a result, these agencies and organizations may inadvertently devote unnecessary time and money to convey data without existing or outdated standards. This research aims to evaluate the components of data conveyance systems, such as transfer methods, tracking, and automation, to guide their improved performance. Specifically, organizations face the challenges of slow dispatch time and manual intervention when conveying data into, within, and from their systems. Conveyance often requires skilled workers when the system depends on physical media such as hard drives, particularly when terabyte transfers are required. In addition, incomplete or inconsistent metadata may necessitate manual intervention, process changes, or both. A proposed solution is organization-wide guidance for efficient data conveyance. That guidance involves systems analysis to outline a data management framework, which may include understanding the minimum requirements of data manifests, specification of transport mechanisms, and improving automation capabilities.

Journal of Big Data↗
USGS2023

GeoAI for spatial image processing

The development of digital image processing, as a subset of digital signal processing, depended upon the maturity of photography and image science, introduction of computers, discovery and advancement of digital recording devices, and the capture of digital images. In addition, government and industry applications in the Earth and medical sciences were paramount to the growth of the technology. From the early days when photography was first introduced to science to today, artificial intelligence and deep learning technologies have been intensively used to analyze imagery. Spatial image processing has experienced breakthroughs and evolutions. This chapter presents an overview of the history of image processing, GeoAI-based image processing applications, and the role of GeoAI in advancing image processing methods and research. We also discussed the remaining challenges to using GeoAI for image processing regarding training data annotation, the issues of scale, resolution, and change in space over time.

Book chapter↗
USGS2023

Geomorphometric analysis of the Summit and Ridge classes of the Geographic Names Information System

This research aims to conduct a geosemantic comparison of landforms classified in the Summit and Ridge feature classes in the Geographic Names Information System (GNIS). The comparison is based on a 2D shape analysis of manually delineated polygons produced by USGS staff to correspond to 33,304 Summit and 8,006 Ridge features. Five shape measures were chosen for this specific geomorphometry-based analysis. Univariate and bivariate statistics are first calculated to compare the two feature classes. This is followed by unsupervised learning with k-means cluster analysis to identify two major geomorphometric clusters corresponding to Summit and Ridge features. Although this supports sufficient internal homogeneity to have stable Summit and Ridge feature classes, more than 7,500 (18%) special features were also identified, which were assigned by k-means to the cluster not corresponding to their given GNIS class. These features remain to be analyzed further to decide if GNIS features should be reclassified based on geomorphometric analysis of available polygonal representations.

Conference Paper↗