USGS Science⌕ Search

Geology topics

R. C. Johnson

Publications and source records attributed to R. C. Johnson.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
USGS1993

Coalbed methane potential of the Upper Cretaceous Mesaverde and Meeteetse formations, Wind River Reservation, Wyoming

The environments of deposition of the uppermost part of the Cody Shale and the Mesaverde and Meeteetse Formations of Late Cretaceous age were studied on outcrop in the Shotgun Butte area in the north-central part of the Wind River Reservation. A shoreface sandstone occurs in the lower part of the Mesaverde Formation at all localities studied, and is directly overlain by a coaly interval. Repetitive coarsening-upward cycles of mudstone, siltstone, and sandstone occur in the 200 ft interval of the upper part of the Cody Shale below the shoreface sandstone. These Cody sandstones are typically hummocky cross stratified with symmetrical ripples near the top, indicating that they are largely storm surge deposits that were later reworked. Channel-form sandstones from 10 to 20 ft thick, with abundant locally derived clayey clasts, occur in a 75 ft thick interval below the shoreface at one locality. These unusual sandstones are largely confined to a narrow area of the outcrop and grade laterally into more typical storm surge deposits. They may be unusually large storm surge channels created when high-energy flow conditions were localized to a limited area of the shelf. The Mesaverde Formation above the shoreface sandstone is divided into a middle member and the Teapot Sandstone Member. The lower part of the middle member is everywhere coaly. Erosional-based sandstones in this coaly interval are highly variable in thickness and architecture. Thin, single channel sandstone bodies were deposited by moderate to high sinuosity streams, and thick, multistory channel sandstone bodies were deposited by rapidly switching fluvial channel systems that remained relatively stationary for extended periods of time. The architecture of the fluvial channel sandstones in the overlying noncoaly interval appears to be highly variable as well, with complex multistory sandstones occurring at different stratigraphic levels at different localities. This distribution may be explained by long term stability of fluvial channel systems followed by major avulsion events. The Teapot Sandstone Member consists of fairly persistent to lenticular white multistory sandstone units that are as much as 85 ft thick and contain trough cross beds as much as 5 ft high. These sandstone units are interbedded with gray mudstones and carbonaceous shales. Paleosols are preserved at the tops of individual sandstones in the multistory units in some places. It is suggested that these sandstones were deposited largely by low-sinuosity to braided streams. The Meeteetse Formation consists of alternating coal and sandstone-rich intervals. The coal-rich intervals have relatively thin fluvial channel sandstones probably deposited by medium to high sinuosity streams whereas the sand-rich intervals have thick (to 105 ft) multistory fluvial channel sandstones possibly deposited by low-sinousity to braided streams.

Conference Paper↗
USGS1993

Cleat development in coals of the Upper Cretaceous Mesaverde Formation, Pilot Butte area, Wind River Reservation, Wyoming

The cleat system developed in low-rank (mean viltrinite reflectance of 0.43 to 0.5 percent) coal beds in the Upper Cretaceous Mesaverde Formation was studied in outcrop and in coreholes drilled for coalbed methane evaluation near Pilot Butte in the central part of the Wind River Reservation. Cleats are the principal permeability pathway for fluids in coal beds. As a result, coalbed gas cannot be economically produced without significant cleat development. Two drillholes about 800 ft (244 m) apart encountered Mesaverde coal beds at depths ranging from 307 to 818 ft (93.6 to 249.3 m). One of the coal beds penetrated while drilling, the lowest coal in the Mesaverde coaly interval, is well exposed about a mile south of the two drillholes and the cleat development in this coal bed on outcrop was compared with that of the same coal in the drillholes. The 3 in (7.62 cm) diameter core is less than ideal for this study because cleat spacing in low-rank coals such as these typically averages greater than 7.62 cm. Nonetheless, face cleats at spacing of from 0.25 to 2.5 cm was observed in many of the coal beds. Cleats were less well-developed in other coal beds and no cleats were observed in a few beds. As expected, butt cleats were somewhat less well-developed than the face cleats. Attempts to relate cleat spacing to gas content, bed thickness, and ash content were not successful. A 3.0 m by 1.8 m area of the upper surface of the coal bed exposed a mile south of the drillsites was cleaned off and studied in detail. Cleat development in this limited study area varied from well-developed face and butt cleats in some places to few or no cleats in others. Face cleats trended roughly perpendicular to the fold axis of the nearby Pilot Butte anticline. Cleats did not penetrate a 2.5 cm thick carbonaceous shale bed about 20 cm above the base of the coal bed indicating that thin carbonaceous shale beds will act a permeability barriers. Two types of face cleats were observed on outcrop: 1) major face cleats that could be traced for as much as a meter along outcrop and averaged as little as 1.6 cm apart; and 2) microfractures or microcleats which paralleled the face cleats but averaged from 0.10 to 0.17 cm apart. The microcleats were more visible on outcrop than in core because of surface weathering which dried out the coal causing the microcleats to open up. This surface weathering also increased the aperture widths on many of the major cleats, and no attempt was made to systematically study aperture widths. These microcleats may contribute significantly to the permeability of the coals in the subsurface. Dewatering of the coal during the early stages of coalbed methane production may help open these microcleats thereby increasing permeability, and hence coalbed gas production, with time.

Conference Paper↗
USGS1993

Stra­tigraphy and oil and gas resources in uppermost Cretaceous and Paleocene rocks, Wind River Reservation, Wyoming

The Cody Shale and the Mesaverde, Meeteetse, and Lance Formations of Late Cretaceous age and the Fort Union Formation of Paleocene age within the Wind River Reservation contain strata that were deposited during the final major regression of the Cretaceous epicontinental sea eastward across central Wyoming and the ensuing initial stages of mountain-building and basin subsidence of the Laramide orogeny. The Reservation spans several major structural elements in the western part of the Wind River Basin, but the feature of primary importance to evaluations of future petroleum resource potential is the western end of the deep basin syncline, which occupies the east-central and southeastern parts of the Reservation where many thousands of feet of synorogenic deposits accumulated. The Cody Shale is characterized by 3,300-4,000 ft of marine shale and sandstone, the latter rock type predominating in the upper part of the formation and grading upward into the basal, regressive sandstone units of the Mesaverde Formation. The Mesaverde, Meeteetse, Lance, and Fort Union Formations are primarily of fluvial origin, and consist mostly of interbedded sandstone and shale with various amounts of carbonaceous shale and thin coal beds. Maximum thicknesses of these formations are 2,150 ft, 1,370 ft, 2,900 ft, and 6,200 ft, respectively. Some parts of the full sequence may be partially or totally cut out beneath erosional unconformities at the base of either the Lance or Fort Union Formations, or at the base of the lower Eocene rocks, near the basin margins. All of the uppermost Cretaceous and Paleocene rocks have yielded commercial quantities of hydrocarbons (chiefly natural gas), primarily from closed anticlines such as the Pavillion and Muddy Ridge fields, but in part from apparent stratigraphic traps formed by the updip pinchouts of lenticular sandstones along the west and southwest margins of the basin syncline as well as within the basin proper. Drilling is sparse in these areas, and the potential for stratigraphic entrapment has yet to be explored in extensive parts of the Reservation.

Conference Paper↗