USGS ScienceSearch

Geology topics

Pradeep K. Singh

Publications and source records attributed to Pradeep K. Singh.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Changes in seabed mining

Chapter 23 of the First World Ocean Assessment (WOA I) focused on marine mining, and particularly on established extractive industries, which are predominantly confined to near-shore areas, where shallow-water, near-shore aggregate and placer deposits, and somewhat deeper water phosphate deposits are found (United Nations, 2017a). At the time of publication, there were no commercially developed deep-water seabed mining (DSM) deposits but an assessment of mining leases and exploration activity was included. Since WOA I, the number of deep-water (depths greater than 200 m below the ocean surface) seabed exploration licenses has increased both within national jurisdictions of coastal, island and archipelagic States, and beyond in the Area (the seabed, ocean floor and subsoil thereof beyond the limits of national jurisdiction) under the administration of the International Seabed Authority (ISA). For the first time, in 2017 deep-water seabed test-mining was carried out by Japan at a water depth of 1,600 m within its exclusive economic zone (EEZ) (METI, 2017). The update in the present Chapter will focus on the nascent deep-water seabed mining industry and mineral deposits. Hereafter, we use seabed for deep-water seabed. Environmental issues focused on impacts from dredging activities and a list of references for some mining operations were provided. However, WOA I could not provide an environmental baseline for DSM and considered that environmental, social and economic aspects were often not adequately understood with available data. Data on potential environmental impacts are still scarce and can differ greatly between mineral extraction from near-shore and seabed mining sites. Information on economic benefits, and to some extent social impacts, of mining is becoming progressively more accessible due to several initiatives promoting an increase in transparency of extractive industries. In 2015, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development was adopted by all United Nations Member States. It includes 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to be addressed on the basis of a global partnership. DSM activities may have implications for the achievement of SDGs 1, 5, 7–10, 12–14, and 17.

Book chapter

Insights from Rock-Eval analysis on the influence of sample weight on hydrocarbon generation from Lower Permian organic-matter rich rocks, West Bokaro basin, India

Among the different Rock-Eval parameters, the hydrocarbons released under S2 peak of Rock-Eval is of significance as it indicates the residual hydrocarbon content of the rock. Further, through its relationship with TOC content, it helps in calculating hydrogen indices (HI) which helps in understanding the type of organic-matter present in a rock [HI= (S2/TOC)*100]. The present study documents the role of sample weight/amount used for analysis on Rock-Eval S2 parameter for unconventional source-rock characterization. For the purpose of study, a vitrain-band sample type (manually isolated from a coal), a high-TOC shale sample type, and a carbonaceous shale sample type, were analyzed at two different particle sizes (viz. 1mm-500 microns and 212-75 microns) and different sample weights (5-15 mg for organic-matter rich rocks, and 30-60 mg for shale) using a Rock-Eval basic cycle (heating rate at 25 °C/min). Although S2 is reported as mg HC/ g rock, with increase in sample weight, an increase in hydrocarbons released under S2 peak of Rock-Eval was observed for all three sample types for both the particle sizes. The observations were further validated using a Norwegian geochemical standard (JR-1). Further, all the samples were reanalyzed by conducting pyrolysis experiments at a lower heating rate of 5 °C/min. The impact of sample weight on S2 and hydrogen index (HI) was observed to be more pronounced for the JR-1 standard (higher hydrocarbon yield) than the Types III-IV organic-matter bearing rocks. It thus calls for interpreters to be aware of the influence of mass of organic-matter on hydrocarbon generation, and to monitor the maximum S2 values of organic-matter bearing rocks, within the Flame Ionization Detector (FID) detection limits. Further, it is recommended that for Type III organic-matter bearing rocks with TOC content>20 wt %, elemental analysis should be used to derive atomic H/C and O/C ratios for Van Krevelen diagram-based kerogen typing.

West Bokaro basin