Basal area loss from fire using field-calibrated remote sensing refines western US fire severity measurements
The spatial patterns of fire effects and tree mortality have profound consequences for forest resilience. Cost-effective, medium-resolution, and spatiotemporally extensive fire severity measurements are essential for informing post-fire restoration and improving our understanding of wildfires—from forest stands to continents and from days to decades. Remote sensing advancements have improved burn severity mapping, but methods vary in interpretability, scalability, generalizability, and alignment with field measurements. One meaningful metric of fire effects on forests is proportion basal area loss, but existing methods are limited by a lack of region-specific field reference data and a scalable mapping framework. To address these issues, we compiled 3280 field reference plots from 123 fires in forests across the Western US to calculate the proportion of fire-induced basal area loss. We then used spatially cross-validated machine learning models with concurrent hyperparameter tuning to select a skillful, parsimonious model from a large candidate set of remotely-sensed, climatic, and topographic predictors. Spectral-only measures of severity over- or underestimated basal area loss in dry versus wet years and across aspects, demonstrating the value of incorporating climatic and topographic context. We also tested model performance on a separate holdout dataset in the Southwest US as a demonstration of reproducibility and transparency. We provide a Google Earth Engine tool for estimating proportional basal area loss for any fire perimeter in the Western US, enabling rapid map creation for land management and ecological modeling. All code, model parameters, and training data are released to support reproducibility, community adoption, regional refinement, and adaptation to new regions.