Nirajan Dhakal | USGS Science

USGS2013

Return period adjustment for runoff coefficients based on analysis in undeveloped Texas watersheds

The rational method for peak discharge (Q p ) estimation was introduced in the 1880s. The runoff coefficient (C) is a key parameter for the rational method that has an implicit meaning of rate proportionality, and the C has been declared a function of the annual return period by various researchers. Rate-based runoff coefficients as a function of the return period, C(T), were determined for 36 undeveloped watersheds in Texas using peak discharge frequency from previously published regional regression equations and rainfall intensity frequency for return periods T of 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 years. The C(T) values and return period adjustments C(T)/C(T=10 year) determined in this study are most applicable to undeveloped watersheds. The return period adjustments determined for the Texas watersheds in this study and those extracted from prior studies of non-Texas data exceed values from well-known literature such as design manuals and textbooks. Most importantly, the return period adjustments exceed values currently recognized in Texas Department of Transportation design guidance when T>10 years.

Texas↗

USGS2011

Estimation of volumetric runoff coefficients for Texas watersheds using land-use and rainfall-runoff data

The rational method for peak discharge ( Q p "> Q p ) estimation was introduced in the 1880s. Although the rational method is considered simplistic, it remains an effective method for estimating peak discharge for small watersheds. The runoff coefficient ( C "> C ) is a key parameter for the rational method and can be estimated in various ways. Literature-based C "> C values ( C lit "> C lit ) are listed for different land-use/land cover (two words, no hyphen) (LULC) conditions in various design manuals and textbooks; however, these C lit "> C lit values were developed with little basis on observed rainfall and runoff data. In this paper, C lit "> C lit values were derived for 90 watersheds in Texas by using LULC data for 1992 and 2001; the C lit "> C lit values derived from the two data sets were essentially the same. Also for this study, volumetric runoff coefficients ( C v "> C v ) were estimated by using observed rainfall and runoff depths from more than 1,600 events observed in the watersheds. Watershed-median and watershed-average C v "> C v values were computed, and both are consistent with data from the National Urban Runoff Program. In addition, C v "> C v values were estimated by using rank-ordered pairs of rainfall and runoff depths (i.e., frequency matching). As anticipated, C "> C values derived by all three methods (literature based, event totals, and frequency matching) consistently had larger values for developed watersheds than for undeveloped watersheds. Two regression equations of C v "> C v versus percent impervious area were developed and combined into a single equation that can be used to rapidly estimate C v "> C v values for similar Texas watersheds.

Texas↗