USGS ScienceSearch

Geology topics

Melvin C. Bowler

Publications and source records attributed to Melvin C. Bowler.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Big River bluegill: Combining vital rates and long-term monitoring to understand population dynamics in large rivers

Long-term monitoring indicates bluegill catch rates are relatively stable in some reaches of the Upper Mississippi River and highly variable in others, whereas in the Illinois River, catch rates have decreased. A lack of age structure information precludes understanding population processes responsible for patterns in catch rates. To build a better understanding of why catch rates have changed over time, we integrated short-term age structure information with long-term monitoring data to quantify and assess spatial patterns in bluegill population dynamics across six study reaches of these two rivers. Specifically, we estimated and compared age and size structure, growth, maturity, mortality, and recruitment. We used quantile regressions to apply age estimates to long-term data for investigating trends in age-based catch rates reflective of recruitment (age-1 catch rates), mortality (using age-1 and age-2+ catch rates), and spawning stock (age-2+). Our findings indicate trends in bluegill age-2+ catch rates increased and then stabilized across upstream study reaches, but dynamic rates, size structure, and age at maturity varied among reaches. Bluegill populations in downstream study reaches had low maximum size, early maturation, low mean age, low proportional stock density, declining recruitment, and declining age-2+ catch rates. An insufficient number of bluegills were collected from the study reach furthest downstream to adequately quantify dynamic rates. Our results support life history theory in that bluegill respond to unstable environmental conditions through life history adaptations. These findings show how integrating periodic age structure information with long-term monitoring can enhance population assessments.

Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Wisconsin

Smallmouth buffalo (Ictiobus bubalus Rafinesque) population trends and demographics in the Upper Mississippi River System

Smallmouth buffalo ( Ictiobus bubalus Rafinesque) are a large-bodied fish highly valued and commercially exploited across most of their range. Despite this, relatively little is known of their population demographics compared to other exploited species. To fill these knowledge gaps, we analyzed two independent long-term datasets (30 and 57 years, respectively) and population demographic data (age structure, growth, mortality, age at maturity, and recruitment) from multiple pools of the Upper Mississippi River System (UMRS) and Illinois River (Illinois, USA). Long-term data (30-year dataset) generally show downward trends or significant declines in catch per unit effort in the UMRS, while the 57-year dataset shows a stable trend or a significant increase in the Illinois River. The oldest smallmouth buffalo were estimated to be 39 years old, with nearly every pool sampled having individuals estimated to exceed 30 years of age. Except for Pool 13 of the UMRS, 90% of smallmouth buffalo were estimated to mature between 411 and 470 mm in length or between 8.7 and 11.2 years old. Recruitment was variable: strong year classes were generally preceded by multiple years of weak year classes. Our results indicate that the smallmouth buffalo population may be stable in portions of the UMRS and Illinois River systems, but significant declines in the northern extent of the UMRS may warrant conservation concern. Recent research into ages of buffalofishes shows that consideration should be given to the idea that the UMRS population could be age truncated. Results also emphasize the importance of long-term data and the ability to show changes in exploited populations over time.

Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Wisconsin

1994 annual status report: a summary of fish data in six reaches of the upper Mississippi River system

The Long Term Resource Monitoring Program (LTRMP) completed 2,653 collections of fishes from stratified random and permanently fixed sampling locations in six study reaches of the Upper Mississippi River System during 1994. Collection methods included day and night electrofishing, hoop netting, fyke netting (two net sizes), gill netting, seining, and trawling in select aquatic area classes. The six LTRMP study areas are Pools 4 (excluding Lake Pepin), 8, 13, and 26 of the Upper Mississippi River, and unimpounded reach of the Mississippi River near Cape Girardeau, Missouri, and the La Grange Pool of the Illinois River. A total of 61-79 fish species were detected in each study area. For each of the six LTRMP study areas, this report contains summaries of (1) sampling efforts in each combination of gear type and aquatic area class, (2) total catches of each species from each gear type, (3) mean catch-per-unit of gear effort statistics and standard errors for common species from each combination of aquatic area class and selected gear type, and (4) length distributions of common species from selected gear types.

Long Term Resource Monitoring Program

1993 annual status report: a summary of fish data in six reaches of the upper Mississippi River system

The Long Term Resource Monitoring Program (LTRMP) completed 1,994 collections of fishes from stratified random and permanently fixed sampling locations in six study reaches of the Upper Mississippi River System during 1993. Collection methods included day and night electrofishing, hoop netting, fyke netting (two net sizes), gill netting, seining, and trawling in select aquatic area classes. The six LTRMP study reaches are Pools 4 (excluding Lake Pepin), 8, 13, and 26 of the Upper Mississippi River, an unimpounded reach of the Mississippi River near Cape Girardeau, Missouri, and the La Grange Pool of the Illinois River. A total of 62-78 fish species were detected in each study reach. For each of the six LTRMP study reaches, this report contains summaries of: (1) sampling efforts in each combination of gear type and aquatic area class, (2) total catches of each species from each gear type, (3) mean catch-per-unit of gear effort statistics and standard errors for common species from each combination of aquatic area class and selected gear type, and (4) length distributions of common species from selected gear types.

Long Term Resource Monitoring Program