USGS ScienceSearch

Geology topics

Marlin M. Dart

Publications and source records attributed to Marlin M. Dart.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Biological and environmental drivers of early life fawn survival in a declining pronghorn population

Pronghorn Antilocapra americana occupy only a portion of their historical range and in Oklahoma occur at the eastern edge of the species' contemporary distribution. Monitoring has suggested pronghorn populations in Oklahoma have declined in recent years. We captured and collared 125 adult females across two winters, monitored them for signs of parturition during each subsequent spring, and then captured and radio-collared 70 fawns ≤ 4 days old. We assessed cause-specific mortality, estimated proportional survival, and visualized survival of fawns through 60 days of life with Kaplan–Meier curves. Nearly 87% of fawn mortalities were attributed to predation, with > 77% of predations attributed to coyotes Canis latrans . Our results indicated that fawn survival was lowest during the first 15 days of life, with 33% of fawns surviving to 15 days and 12% surviving to 60 days. We used known-fate models to evaluate the influence of biological factors (i.e. sex, mass, birth timing), environmental factors (i.e. ambient temperature, precipitation, vegetation), and temporal variation on the probability of early life (i.e. the first 15 days) survival. For each adult female with a collared fawn, we used female space-use patterns for 30 days before and 15 days after parturition to collect environmental covariates. Early life probability of survival was lower for larger fawns, those born earlier in the parturition period (i.e. earlier in the year relative to the range of parturition days), and those with higher pre-parturition temperatures; daily probability of survival decreased with time-since-parturition within the first 15 days of life. Our results indicate poor fawn survival, highlight a potential limitation of population growth, and can inform population management by identifying factors influencing early life fawn survival.

Oklahoma

Harmless tags or hazardous ads? Investigating the potential for ear tags to increase predation on neonatal ungulates

Studies involving individually marked animals provide insights predicated on the assumption marked individuals are accurate models of their unmarked counterparts. Taxa-specific and marker-specific examinations are needed to determine if marked animals are suitable models for the parameter(s) being measured. Our objective was to determine if brightly colored ear tags influenced the probability of predation for neonatal ungulates. We captured 94 neonatal pronghorn (Antilocapra americana (Ord, 1815)), fitted each neonate with a tracking collar, and attached a yellow ear tag to 49 (52.1%) of the captured neonates. We monitored the survival of each neonate during 2023–2024 in Oklahoma, USA. Predation was the leading cause of mortality during our monitoring period and accounted for 29 (82.9%) of the 35 mortalities with a known cause. Coyotes (Canis latrans Say, 1823) were the predominant predator of neonatal pronghorn in our study area. Presence of a yellow ear tag seemingly did not influence the probability of predation, even though coyotes can distinguish yellow objects from most natural backgrounds. A larger sample size may be needed to validate our results, but neonatal ungulates with an ear tag appear to be accurate models of neonatal ungulates without an ear tag when examining predation risk.

Oklahoma

Predator-induced injury of a neonatal pronghorn cues abandonment of current reproductive investment

Evolutionary theory predicts that parental care is favored when the fitness benefits outweigh the costs of providing care (Klug et al., 2012 ). In mammals, parental care is generally provided by females, who provide nourishment through lactation, protection from predators, aid in juvenile movement, or otherwise facilitate offspring survival (Balshine, 2012 ; Lent, 1974 ). However, in capital breeding species that rely on stored energy reserves for reproduction, increased investment can reduce the female's body condition and the number of offspring produced in subsequent years (Balme et al., 2017 ; Cook et al., 2013 ; Stephens et al., 2009 ). Unlike income breeders, which produce offspring from concurrent energy uptake, capital breeders deplete energy stores during reproduction, and lactation hinders the recovery of these stores (Clutton-Brock et al., 1983 ; Cook et al., 2013 ; Stephens et al., 2009 ). Consequently, iteroparous mammals face a trade-off between investing in current offspring and investing in maintenance or future offspring (Hamel et al., 2010 ; Stearns, 1989 ; Williams, 1966 ).

Ecology

Efficacy of machine learning image classification for automated occupancy-based monitoring

Remote cameras have become a widespread data-collection tool for terrestrial mammals, but classifying images can be labor intensive and limit the usefulness of cameras for broad-scale population monitoring. Machine learning algorithms for automated image classification can expedite data processing, but image misclassifications may influence inferences. Here, we used camera data for three sympatric species with disparate body sizes and life histories – black-tailed jackrabbits ( Lepus californicus ), kit foxes ( Vulpes macrotis ), and pronghorns ( Antilocapra americana ) – as a model system to evaluate the influence of competing image classification approaches on estimates of occupancy and inferences about space use. We classified images with: (i) single review (manual), (ii) double review (manual by two observers), (iii) an automated-manual review (machine learning to cull empty images and single review of remaining images), (iv) a pretrained machine-learning algorithm that classifies images to species (base model), (v) the base model accepting only classifications with ≥95% confidence, (vi) the base model trained with regional images (trained model), and (vii) the trained model accepting only classifications with ≥95% confidence. We compared species-specific results from alternative approaches to results from double review, which reduces the potential for misclassifications and was assumed to be the best approximation of truth. Despite high classification success, species-level misclassification rates for the base and trained models were sufficiently high to produce erroneous occupancy estimates and inferences related to space use across species. Increasing the confidence thresholds for image classification to 95% did not consistently improve performance. Classifying images as empty (or not) offered a reasonable approach to reduce effort (by 97.7%) and facilitated a semi-automated workflow that produced reliable estimates and inferences. Thus, camera-based monitoring combined with machine learning algorithms for image classification could facilitate monitoring with limited manual image classification.

Utah

The effect of scent lures on detection is not equitable among sympatric species

Context: Camera trapping is an effective tool for cost-efficient monitoring of species over large temporal and spatial scales and it is becoming an increasingly popular method for investigating wildlife communities and trophic interactions. However, camera trapping targeting rare and elusive species can be hampered by low detection rates, which can decrease the accuracy and precision of results from common analytical approaches (e.g., occupancy modeling, capture-recapture). Consequently, researchers often employ attractants to increase detection without accounting for how attractants influence detection of species among trophic levels. Aims: We aimed to evaluate the influences of a commonly used non-species-specific olfactory lure (i.e. sardines) and sampling design on detection of four species (i.e. bobcat [ Lynx rufus ], coyote [ Canis latrans ], raccoon [ Procyon lotor ], and eastern cottontail [ Sylvilagus floridanus ]) that represented a range of foraging guilds in an agricultural landscape. Methods: We set 180 camera stations, each for ∼28 days, during the summer of 2019. We set cameras with one of three lure treatments: (1) olfactory lure, (2) no olfactory lure, or (3) olfactory lure only during the latter half of the survey. We evaluated the influence of the lure at three temporal scales of detection (i.e. daily probability of detection, independent sequences per daily detection, and triggers per independent sequence). Key results: The lure tended to positively influence detection of coyotes and raccoons but negatively influenced detection of bobcats and eastern cottontails. The influence of the lure varied among temporal scales of detection. Conclusions: Scent lures can differentially influence detection of species within or among tropic levels, and the influence of a scent lure may vary among temporal scales. Implications: Our results demonstrate the importance of evaluating the influence of an attractant for each focal species when using camera data to conduct multi-species or community analyses, accounting for variation in sampling strategies across cameras, and identifying the appropriate species-specific temporal resolution for assessing variation in detection data. Furthermore, we highlight that care should be taken when using camera data as an index of relative abundance (e.g. as is commonly done with prey species) when there is variation in the use of lures across cameras.

Wildlife Research