Geology topics

Lee F G Gutowsky

Publications and source records attributed to Lee F G Gutowsky.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

USGS2022

Lake Ontario April prey fish survey results and Alewife assessment, 2022

The annual Lake Ontario April bottom trawl survey and Alewife, Alosa pseudoharengus , population assessment provide science to inform management decisions related to predator-prey balance and fish community dynamics. The 2022 survey was conducted from March 31 to April 26, included 235 trawls in the main lake and embayments, and sampled depths from 5 to 219 m (16 – 723 ft). The survey captured 311,770 fish from 30 species with a total weight of 7,740 kg (17,028 lbs.). Alewife were 85% of the catch by number while Rainbow Smelt, Osmerus mordax , Round Goby, Neogobius melanostomus , and Deepwater Sculpin, Myoxocephalus thompsonii , comprised 6%, 4%, and 4% of the catch, respectively. The 2022 biomass index for Rainbow Smelt decreased 80% relative to the high values observed in 2021 as did the value for Cisco, Coregonus artedi , (46% decline). Emerald Shiner, Notropis atherinoides , biomass index increased in 2021 and Threespine Stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus , biomass remained low. No Bloater, Coregonus hoyi , were captured during the 2022 survey. In 2022, Alewife biomass in U.S. waters (58.1 kilograms per hectare, kg·ha-1) was substantially higher than Canadian waters (26.3 kg·ha-1). The 2022 Alewife biomass index (41.6 kg·ha-1) decreased 10% from 2021 while the 2022 density index decreased 62% from 2021. Prediction modeling indicated the growth of the abundant 2020 Alewife year class, sampled as age-1 fish in 2021, would cause the adult Alewife biomass to increase in 2022. Although the adult Alewife biomass did increase relative to 2021 (61%), the increase was lower than predicted. The difference between the predictions and observations was because survival of age-1 fish from 2021 to 2022 was lower than had previously been observed. In the three previous years of observations the proportion of age-1 Alewife surviving to age 2 ranged from 0.33 to 0.53; however, that proportion was only 0.21 from 2021 to 2022. Survival estimates of Alewife age-5 through age-8 were higher than previously observed, possibly because salmonid predation focused on the abundant younger Alewife. The catch of age-1 Alewife in 2022, which is a measure of reproductive success in 2021, was below average and similar to the abundances of the 2018 and 2019 year classes. Simulation modeling results indicated the adult Alewife biomass is likely to increase slightly in 2023, whereas predictions for 2024 are less certain. Hydroacoustic sampling was used to estimate prey fish densities in open-water, pelagic habitats not sampled by the bottom trawl. Bottom trawl-based densities from the lake bottom were at least 25 times greater than densities of prey fish in the water column above the trawl. These results support the idea that, in April, when the warmest, most dense water is on the lake bottom, Alewife and most other pelagic prey fish primarily inhabit deep, near bottom habitats and can be effectively sampled with bottom trawling.

Lake Ontario↗

USGS2019

Conducting and interpreting fish telemetry studies: Considerations for researchers and resource managers

Telemetry is an increasingly common tool for studying the ecology of wild fish, with great potential to provide valuable information for management and conservation. For researchers to conduct a robust telemetry study, many essential considerations exist related to selecting the appropriate tag type, fish capture and tagging methods, tracking protocol, data processing and analyses, and interpretation of findings. For telemetry-derived knowledge to be relevant to managers and policy makers, the research approach must consider management information needs for decision-making, while end users require an understanding of telemetry technology (capabilities and limitations), its application to fisheries research and monitoring (study design), and proper interpretation of results and conclusions (considering the potential for biases and proper recognition of associated uncertainties). To help bridge this gap, we provide a set of considerations and a checklist for researchers to guide them in conducting reliable and management-relevant telemetry studies, and for managers to evaluate the reliability and relevance of telemetry studies so as to better integrate findings into management plans. These considerations include implicit assumptions, technical limitations, ethical and biological realities, analytical merits, and the relevance of study findings to decision-making processes.

Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries↗

USGS2016

A moving target—incorporating knowledge of the spatial ecology of fish into the assessment and management of freshwater fish populations

Freshwater fish move vertically and horizontally through the aquatic landscape for a variety of reasons, such as to find and exploit patchy resources or to locate essential habitats (e.g., for spawning). Inherent challenges exist with the assessment of fish populations because they are moving targets. We submit that quantifying and describing the spatial ecology of fish and their habitat is an important component of freshwater fishery assessment and management. With a growing number of tools available for studying the spatial ecology of fishes (e.g., telemetry, population genetics, hydroacoustics, otolith microchemistry, stable isotope analysis), new knowledge can now be generated and incorporated into biological assessment and fishery management. For example, knowing when, where, and how to deploy assessment gears is essential to inform, refine, or calibrate assessment protocols. Such information is also useful for quantifying or avoiding bycatch of imperiled species. Knowledge of habitat connectivity and usage can identify critically important migration corridors and habitats and can be used to improve our understanding of variables that influence spatial structuring of fish populations. Similarly, demographic processes are partly driven by the behavior of fish and mediated by environmental drivers. Information on these processes is critical to the development and application of realistic population dynamics models. Collectively, biological assessment, when informed by knowledge of spatial ecology, can provide managers with the ability to understand how and when fish and their habitats may be exposed to different threats. Naturally, this knowledge helps to better evaluate or develop strategies to protect the long-term viability of fishery production. Failure to understand the spatial ecology of fishes and to incorporate spatiotemporal data can bias population assessments and forecasts and potentially lead to ineffective or counterproductive management actions.

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment↗

USGS2015

Seasonal thermal ecology of adult walleye (Sander vitreus) in Lake Huron and Lake Erie

The purpose of this study was to characterize thermal patterns and generate occupancy models for adult walleye from lakes Erie and Huron with internally implanted biologgers coupled with a telemetry study to assess the effects of sex, fish size, diel periods, and lake. Sex, size, and diel periods had no effect on thermal occupancy of adult walleye in either lake. Thermal occupancy differed between lakes and seasons. Walleye from Lake Erie generally experienced higher temperatures throughout the spring and summer months than did walleye in Lake Huron, due to limnological differences between the lakes. Tagged walleye that remained in Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron (i.e., adjacent to the release location), as opposed to those migrating to the main basin of Lake Huron, experienced higher temperatures, and thus accumulated more thermal units (the amount of temperature units amassed over time) throughout the year. Walleye that migrated toward the southern end of Lake Huron occupied higher temperatures than those that moved toward the north. Consequently, walleye that emigrated from Saginaw Bay experienced thermal environments that were more favorable for growth as they spent more time within their thermal optimas than those that remained in Saginaw Bay. Results presented in this paper provide information on the thermal experience of wild fish in a large lake, and could be used to refine sex- and lake-specific bioenergetics models of walleye in the Great Lakes to enable the testing of ecological hypotheses.

Journal of Thermal Biology↗