USGS ScienceSearch

Geology topics

John Spoelstra

Publications and source records attributed to John Spoelstra.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Ground water quality sub-indicator report

The overall status of groundwater quality in the Great Lakes Basin is assessed as “Good” (Figure 1). For the assessed fraction of the basin (84% of the total area), the groundwater quality is “Good” in 58% of the area, “Fair” in 41% of the area, and “Poor” in 1% of the area, resulting in an overall assessment of “Good”. The portions of the basin that have insufficient data (16% percent of the total Basin area; e.g., the northern portion of the Lake Superior basin) are not assessed, and their indicator status is classified as “Undetermined” (see Basin-by-Basin Assessments below). The overall trend in groundwater quality in the basin is “Undetermined” primarily due to a lack of repeated sampling for most sites: most sites have only one sample result. However, increasing (upward) trends in chloride and nitrate concentrations in groundwater have been reported for various watersheds within the basin. The overall status of groundwater quality has changed from “Fair” in the previous report (2019) to “Good” in this report, which is attributed to the improved geospatial data coverage. Across the basin, the number of sites with available sample data and the spatial distribution of sites increased substantially for this assessment (670 data points in 2019 versus 6,554 in 2022). Although not all newly added samples were collected since the last report, the data were not available for the previous assessment.

Great Lakes

Unprocessed atmospheric nitrate in waters of the Northern Forest Region in the USA and Canada

Little is known about the regional extent and variability of nitrate from atmospheric deposition that is transported to streams without biological processing in forests. We measured water chemistry and isotopic tracers (δ 18 O and δ 15 N) of nitrate sources across the Northern Forest Region of the U.S. and Canada and reanalyzed data from other studies to determine when, where, and how unprocessed atmospheric nitrate was transported in catchments. These inputs were more widespread and numerous than commonly recognized, but with high spatial and temporal variability. Only 6 of 32 streams had high fractions (>20%) of unprocessed atmospheric nitrate during baseflow. Seventeen had high fractions during stormflow or snowmelt, which corresponded to large fractions in near-surface soil waters or groundwaters, but not deep groundwater. The remaining 10 streams occasionally had some (<20%) unprocessed atmospheric nitrate during stormflow or baseflow. Large, sporadic events may continue to be cryptic due to atmospheric deposition variation among storms and a near complete lack of monitoring for these events. A general lack of observance may bias perceptions of occurrence; sustained monitoring of chronic nitrogen pollution effects on forests with nitrate source apportionments may offer insights needed to advance the science as well as assess regulatory and management schemes.

Environmental Science and Technology