USGS Science⌕ Search

Geology topics

Isidore Zietz

Publications and source records attributed to Isidore Zietz.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
USGS1980

Preliminary aeromagnetic map of the Charlotte 1 x 2 degree quadrangle, North Carolina, South Carolina

The aeromagnetic map of the Charlotte 1 x 2 degree quadrangle was assembled by 6 individual detailed aeromagnetic surveys flown between 1956 and 1976 (see index map). The International Geomagnetic Reference Field had been subtracted from the data prior to assembly. An arbitrary common datum was selected and the surveys were recontoured at the joins. The 100 gamma contour was selected because it shows the magnetic contrast to best advantage. To complement the magnetic data a gravity survey was conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey and this data is available in a companion map (Wilson and Daniels, in press). Each of these maps has been interpreted in relation to the other and to the geologic map prepared as part of the same program (Goldsmith and others, 1978). It should be noted that the geophysics has had a measurable influence on some of the geologic mapping.

North Carolina, South Carolina↗
USGS1974

Interpretation of aeromagnetic anomalies bearing on the origin of upper Chesapeake Bay and river course changes in the Central Atlantic Seaboard Region: Speculations

On an aeromagnetic map of the Chesapeake Bay area, the northeastern part of the bay coincides well with a deep, “flat” magnetic low, and the upper part of the Delmarva Peninsula east of the bay coincides with detailed magnetic highs; the two areas are separated by a steep, straight gradient that matches the eastern shore of the bay. On the basis of magnetic and geologic evidence, we interpret the Chesapeake Bay magnetic low as a buried Baltimore Gneiss dome, bounded on the southeast by a normal or reverse fault marked by the steep, straight gradient; mafic and ultramafic plutonic rocks probably underlie the southeast side of the fault zone. The flatness of the Chesapeake Bay magnetic low, as opposed to the detail of the anomalies on either side, however, suggests that an abnormal thickness of nonmagnetic sedimentary rocks also coincides with the low. This could reflect a buried Triassic basin or, more probably, a thickened section of Coastal Plain sedimentary rocks deposited in the fault-bounded basin. The present course of the upper part of Chesapeake Bay is probably inherited from the pre-Pleistocene course of the Susquehanna River, but the river's course may have been determined by the fault zone. Thus, this zone and similar en echelon fault zones along strike may explain the sudden change in course of major rivers in the central Atlantic Seaboard region.

Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia↗