USGS Science⌕ Search

Geology topics

I. J. Witkind

Publications and source records attributed to I. J. Witkind.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
USGS1978

Giant glacial grooves at the north end of the Mission Range, Northwest Montana

Giant glacial grooves both cut across and wrap around the north end of the Mission Range. Some of these grooves are straight, others crescentic, but all appear to be independent of stratigraphic units and of the gross structure of the range. They were seemingly localized by preexisting stream valleys whose original trends were determined by joints. The grooves are cut in bedrock, U-shaped in cross section, thickly veneered with till, and roughly parallel. Most range in length from 0.5 km to 3.5 km. Each groove maintains a uniform width, but widths range from about 50 in to 275 in. Depths of individual grooves vary widely, ranging from about 10 m to about 60 in. The grooves are probably contemporaneous in age, but their time of formation is uncertain; it seems to have been prior to late Pinedale time but after the pre-Bull Lake glaciations. Of the various interpretations offered to explain their origin, the one that appears to fit most of the facts suggests that those grooves at the northern tip of the mountains were carved by a lobe of the south-flowing Cordilleran ice sheet, whereas those farther south were likely formed by the westward deflection of a north-flowing Swan valley glacier.

Montana↗
USGS1958

Geology and ore deposits of the Monument Valley area, Apache and Navajo counties, Arizona: Part II

In 1951 and 1952, the U.S. Geological Survey conducted a program of uranium investigations and geologic mapping in the Monument Valley area, Apache and Navajo Counties, Ariz. About 700 square miles were mapped on the Navajo Indian Reservation. A resource appraisal of the area was an inherent part of the program, and is detailed in this report. Production of vanadium and uranium is from two areas, the Monument No. 1 mine area in Navajo County, and the Monument No. 2 mine area in Apache County. In the period 1942-53 about 200,300 tons of ore was produced from these two areas. This ore yielded about 1,700,000 pounds of U 3 O 8 and about 6,500,000 pounds of V 2 O 5 . The grade ranged from 0.15 percent U 3 O 8 to 0.60 percent U 3 O 8 , and from 0.38 percent V 2 O 5 to 3.02 percent V 2 O 5 . The vanadium-uranium ratio is about 4:1. The ore deposits are composed principally of the hydrous calcium-uranium vanadate tyuyamunite in basal channel sediments of the Shinarump member off the Chinle formation. Four types of ore bodies are present: (1) rods, (2) tabular ore bodies, (3) corvusite-type ore bodies, and (4) rolls. The reserves of uranium- and vanadium-bearing material are classed as measured, indicated, inferred, and potential. The reserves are further divided into three grade classes for material 1 foot or more thick: (1) 0.10 percent U 3 O 8 and 1.00 percent V 2 O 5 and above; (2) 0.05 percent U 3 O 8 and 0.50 percent V 2 O 5 and less than 0.10 percent U 3 O 8 and 1.00 percent V 2 O 5 ; and (3) 0.01 percent U 3 O 8 and 0.10 percent V 2 O 5 and less than 0.05 percent U 3 O 8 and 0.05 percent V 2 O 5 . Measured reserves as of June 1953, in the Monument Valley area, Arizona, (all in the Monument No. 2 mine) total about 36,000 tons. Indicated reserves in the first grade class amount to about 62,000 tons. In this same grade class inferred reserves total about 3,000,000 tons. In the second grade class indicated and inferred reserves amount to about 2,000,000 tons. Inferred reserves in the third grade class total about 345,000 tons of mineralized material. Potential reserves in all grade classes for the Monument Valley area amount to about 13,000,000 tons. It is recommended that an extensive exploration program be carried out in the Monument Valley area, Arizona. This program would consist of two phases. The first phase would involve a geophysical survey of selected channels and would have at its principal objective the delineation of the trend, length, width, and depth of scour of the channels. The second phase would consist of a diamond-drilling program that would make use of the data secured by the geophysical survey. This drilling program would have as one of its principal objectives the determination of which channels are most likely to contain ore bodies. Once the favorable channels are discovered, the drilling program could be carried on most suitably by private operators.

Arizona↗