Status of Clear Lake Hitch in Lower Blue Lake, Lake County, California
No abstract available.
California↗
Geology topics
Danielle L. Palm
Publications and source records attributed to Danielle L. Palm.
Carbon and nitrogen isotopes of different native fish tissues from the Santa Ana River, California
Objective Stable isotopes are commonly used to understand the role of fishes in aquatic food webs. However, variability in species- and tissue-specific isotopic values can affect the inference that is drawn from a stable isotope study. We evaluated differences in stable isotopes of carbon (δ 13 C) and nitrogen (δ 15 N) among three tissue types (white muscle, caudal fin rays, and eye lenses) for Santa Ana Sucker Pantosteus santaanae and Arroyo Chub Gila orcuttii to inform the design of a stable isotope study in the Santa Ana River, an urban river that is located in southern California. Methods We used multivariate analyses to test for differences in the stable isotopes of carbon (δ 13 C) and nitrogen (δ 15 N) among the three tissue types that were collected from Santa Ana Sucker and Arroyo Chub. We also summarized the variability in isotopic values that was recorded over time in fish eye lenses and interpreted this variability in reference to the spatial patterns in isotopic values that have been previously reported throughout the Santa Ana River. Results We found that fin ray tissue and white muscle tissue were not significantly different for either isotope or fish species. Fish eye lenses were significantly higher in δ 13 C than muscle tissue, and eye lenses were significantly higher in δ 15 N than fin ray tissue for both fishes. We also found a greater range in δ 13 C and δ 15 N across eye lens layers for Santa Ana Sucker (δ 13 C = 2.01 ± 0.96‰, δ 15 N = 4.93 ± 4.18‰) than for Arroyo Chub (δ 13 C = 0.96 ± 0.65‰, δ 15 N = 4.63 ± 1.45‰). Conclusion Our results indicate that fin rays may be a viable nonlethal alternative to white muscle tissue for use in a stable isotope study of native fish of the Santa Ana River. Additionally, eye lenses could provide a chemical history of fishes within the river, but species-specific correction factors may be needed if stable isotope values for eye lenses are to be compared with more conventional tissue types (e.g., white muscle).
California↗
Continuous water-quality and suspended-sediment transport monitoring in San Francisco Bay, California, water years 2020–21
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has continuously monitored real-time water quality and suspended-sediment transport in San Francisco Bay (the Bay) since 1989 as part of a multi-agency effort (see “Acknowledgments” section) to address estuary management, water supply, and ecological concerns. The San Francisco Bay area is home to millions of people and biologically diverse marine and terrestrial flora and fauna. Freshwater mixes with saltwater in the Bay and is subject to riverine influences (floods, droughts, managed reservoir releases, and freshwater diversions) and marine influences (tides, waves, and effects of saltwater). Water temperature, salinity, suspended-sediment concentration (SSC), and turbidity, are used by State and Federal resources managers and are monitored at eight key locations throughout the Bay (fig. 1). Water temperature and salinity affect the density of water, which controls gravity-driven circulation patterns and stratification in the water column. Salinity indicates the relative mixing of fresh and ocean waters in the Bay and is derived from specific conductance measurements. Turbidity is a measure of light scattered from suspended particles in the water that is used to estimate suspended-sediment concentration. Suspended-sediment concentrations also are directly measured through depth-integrated water sampling. Suspended sediment affects Bay water quality in multiple ways. Suspended sediment affects phytoplankton growth by attenuating sunlight in the water column. Suspended sediment deposition on tidal marshes and intertidal mudflats helps to restore and sustain these habitats as sea level rises. Settling of suspended sediment in ports and shipping channels creates the need for more dredging. In addition, suspended sediment often carries adsorbed contaminants as it is transported in the water column, which affects the distributions and concentrations of adsorbed contaminants in the environment. Excessive concentrations of sediment-adsorbed contaminants in deposits on the bottom of the Bay can affect ecosystem health. External factors, such as tidal currents, waves, and wind can also affect water quality in the Bay. Tidal currents in the Bay change direction four times daily, and wind direction and intensity typically fluctuate on a daily cycle. Consequently, salinity, water temperature, and suspended-sediment concentration differ spatially and temporally throughout the Bay. Therefore, high-frequency measurements at multiple locations are needed to monitor these changes. Data collected at eight stations throughout the Bay are transmitted in near real-time using cellular telemetry and posted to the USGS National Water Information System (NWIS; https://waterdata.usgs.gov/usa/nwis ). The purposes of this fact sheet are to (1) provide information about the USGS San Francisco Bay water-quality monitoring network; (2) highlight various applications in which these data can be used; and (3) provide internet links to access the resulting continuous water-quality data collected by the USGS.
California↗
Continuous water-quality and suspended-sediment transport monitoring in the San Francisco Bay, California, water years 2018–19
Water-Quality in San Francisco Bay The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) monitors water quality and suspended-sediment transport in the San Francisco Bay (Bay) as part of a multi-agency effort to address estuary management, water supply, and ecological concerns. The San Francisco Bay area is home to millions of people, and the Bay teems with marine and terrestrial flora and fauna. Freshwater mixes with saltwater in the Bay and is subject to riverine influences (floods, droughts, managed reservoir releases, and freshwater diversions) and marine influences (tides, waves, and effects of saltwater). To understand this environment, the USGS, along with its cooperators (see “Acknowledgments” section), has been monitoring the Bay’s waters continuously since 1988.
California↗