D. S. Balser | USGS Science

USGS1968

Effect of predator reduction on waterfowl nesting success

A 6-year study to determine the effect of nest-predator removal on waterfowl nesting success was conducted at the Agassiz National Wildlife Refuge in northwestern Minnesota from 1959 through 1964. Predators were removed from the west side of the Refuge while the east side served as a control area. At the end of 3 years, these areas were reversed to reduce the effects of environmental influences. The effect of predator removal was measured by a simulated nest study to determine predation pressure, a check of natural nest success, and weekly breeding pair and brood counts. Results indicated that 60 percent more Class I ducklings were produced on the units where predator control was conducted. Until more is known, reduction of predators to increase waterfowl nesting success should be limited to intensively managed production areas where substantial nest losses are demonstrated.

Minnesota↗

USGS1964

Management of predator populations with antifertility agents

The search for methods, other than lethal techniques, for controlling predatory animals causing economic losses to the livestock industry prompted investigation of antifertility agents to suppress reproduction. Diethylstilbestrol was selected for initial trials because of its demonstrated antifertility effect on rabbits, mink ( Mustela vison ), dogs, and cattle. In penned tests with stilbestrol, pregnancy was terminated in six coyotes ( C anis latrans ) fed a single 100-mg oral dose dissolved in tallow. A subsequent field trial was conducted in New Mexico on 20 townships, March 5-15, 1963. Five thousand (100 mg stilbestrol in ½ ounce of tallow) drop baits were placed wherever coyote sign was found. After a delay of 3 weeks to allow the drug to take effect, a collection of female tracts from the treated area and a reference area 25 miles away was made to measure and compare reproductive success. Of the 20 females in reproductive condition recovered from the treated area, only 4 had viable embryos, while reproduction was blocked in 16 specimens by failure of implantation or resorption of embryos. All of the 13 females in reproductive condition from the reference area would have produced pups as evidenced by viable embryos. Future tests are scheduled to determine effects on other species and to confirm results on coyotes under a variety of field conditions.

Journal of Wildlife Management↗