Benjamin Zaitchik | USGS Science

USGS2025

A nationwide evaluation of crowd-sourced ambient temperature data

Growing concerns about heat in urban areas paired with the sparsity of weather stations have resulted in individuals drawing on data from citizen science sensor networks to fill in data gaps. The PurpleAir are the most widely-used low-cost air quality sensors in the contiguous United States with 14,777 deployed between 1 Jan 2017 and 20 July 2021. Although the air quality data from PurpleAir sensors have been widely studied, less attention has been paid to reported temperature. We compare temperature metrics reported by PurpleAir sensors with a gridded temperature product, the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS)-2, which although not a gold-standard measure of temperature, is widely used in epidemiologic research. We evaluate the lag between indoor and outdoor PurpleAir temperatures. We report associations of the difference between outdoor PurpleAir temperatures and NLDAS-2 temperatures, an indicator of degradation, and the duration of sensor operation. Finally, based on the temperature range recorded by the outdoor PurpleAir sensors vis.a.vis NLDAS-2 temperatures, we provide a list of 271 (2.5%) sensors potentially misclassified as outdoor and likely located indoors. We observed that outdoor PurpleAir sensors agreed well with NLDAS-2 (R2 > 0.82). This association broke down under warm conditions (daily average NLDAS ≥ 21.1oC). Landcover and climate zone were significant modifiers of the association between PurpleAir and NLDAS-2 temperature metrics with the poorest PurpleAir- NLDAS-2 agreement in urban areas. Indoor PurpleAir temperatures lagged hourly NLDAS temperatures by two hours across almost all climate zones. The mean difference in hourly PurpleAir and NLDAS-2 temperatures increased by 0.57oC for every operational year, suggesting that careful attention must be paid to degradation. Overall, we find for use in epidemiological studies, that the PurpleAir sensor data is a reliable metric of daytime mean air temperature, but researchers should be aware of its limitations when examining extreme heat, or when aggregating sensor data across multiple years.

Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering↗

USGS2023

Limited role of absolute humidity in intraurban heat variability

Monitoring and understanding the variability of heat within cities is important for urban planning and public health, and the number of studies measuring intraurban temperature variability is growing. Recognizing that the physiological effects of heat depend on humidity as well as temperature, measurement campaigns have included measurements of relative humidity alongside temperature. However, the role the spatial structure in humidity, independent from temperature, plays in intraurban heat variability is unknown. Here we use summer temperature and humidity from networks of stationary sensors in multiple cities in the United States to show spatial variations in the absolute humidity within these cities are weak. This variability in absolute humidity plays an insignificant role in the spatial variability of the heat index and humidity index (humidex), and the spatial variability of the heat metrics is dominated by temperature variability. Thus, results from previous studies that considered only intraurban variability in temperature will carry over to intraurban heat variability. Also, this suggests increases in humidity from green infrastructure interventions designed to reduce temperature will be minimal. In addition, a network of sensors that only measures temperature is sufficient to quantify the spatial variability of heat across these cities when combined with humidity measured at a single location, allowing for lower-cost heat monitoring networks.

Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology↗